Basic Strategies for Evaluating Counseling Outcomes

1996 Words8 Pages
Signature Assignment: Research Paper Basic Strategies for Evaluating Counseling Outcomes Most scientists, researchers and health care professionals understand the importance of being able to employ effective basic strategies for evaluation after a specific strategy has been employed be it in a research project or in clinical work. Evaluation is key as it forces professionals to truly scrutinize and zero-in on the effectiveness or lack of effectiveness of a given strategy. In a mental health care setting, being able to lucidly determine and assess the effectiveness and success of mental health care counseling based on the outcomes is a vital component of therapy at large. One basic method of evaluating mental health outcomes from counseling is the matching model (Martin-Swartz-Kulstad, 2000). For example, counselors can use this model to determine the vocational, occupational, emotional or general well being status of a group of counselees years after therapy: this was done using a psychograph (Martin-Swartz-Kulstad, 2000). "A typical study… would follow up on a group of counselees to determine their vocational status some years after counseling… A panel of expert judges (typically experienced counselors) would then evaluate the 'goodness of match' between the counselee and the occupation, based on their reading of the counselee's case folder (which contained data for personal anaylsis) and their knowledge of the occupation and its requirements"
Open Document