Samantha Bates - I would give Samantha Bates a 5 because she was super helpful throughout the whole process. She made it easy to get things done because she went with the flow, while also voicing her opinion.
Sean Casey I would give Sean Casey a 4 because he was helpful once he posted his nomination letter. However, since his nomination letter was a bit late it made it difficult for us to make a group decision. He worked on quite a few slides for us.
I thought Jonna Erwin was supposed to be in our group according to blackboard but I never once heard from her. She never posted her nomination letter or anything else to the discussion board. I honestly forgot she was in our group since she never contributed. I would say if she was supposed to be in our group for this project then I would give her a 0 since she didn't do anything.
…show more content…
Even though her computer was having trouble she was still able to contribute. She was also always willing to help with anything that needed to be done.
I would give Bryce Lawless a 5, although his nomination letter was late due to a death in his family. As soon as he could he posted to the discussion board to ask what he missed, how he could help, and then even jumped right in with slides.
I would definitely give Jaycee Lee a 5. She was SO helpful when it came to the decision process after the nomination letters were posted. Jaycee always offered to help anyone who needed the help. She even posted Sherry's information to the slides when Sherry's computer was having issues.
At first we all planned on working on slides individually but once we got ours done, then we would ask the others if they needed help. So in the end we all contributed to the powerpoint
Lastly, Sally did an excellent jJob at communicating with her patients. She could explain the procedure in technical terms but also make it understandable to the patient. She was very good at explaining the procedure to them without belittling them. I am very good at understanding procedures on a technical level but then simplifying them to make them more understandable both to others and myself.
Angel Davis took the parts of introduction, problem, and population. Angel did a great job on her section. Her parts of the paper are very informative. She kept on target about her topics and brought an A game. Angel and I made most the calls to the paper. The only problem I came across with Angel is it seemed like she waited until the last week before she started working on the project.
Hi, Paula, this is Chris. Can you please recommend me any capable in-house candidates for the
is nice, understanding, and cares for Melinda. In my opinion, Mr. Freeman has the most potential to help Melinda because he
It is with great pleasure that I recommend Daisha Carson. I have known her for fourteen years. As I have watched her grow into this beautiful inspiring young woman there has been nothing more than excellence that has come from her with all of her endeavors. She has overcome many adversities in her life that I feel has prepared her for taking on opportunities such as this.
I interviewed Ashley Porras, a Licensed Vocational Nurse at Sharp Rees Stealy. She gave me background information of how she got into the healthcare system, great advice and what she does on a daily basis. The reason I chose Ashley as the person to interview was because I got the chance to spend the day with her at work and I loved it. I found it interesting what she did and got the opportunity to learn more about her, her occupation and where she see’s herself in the future. Someday, I would be an LVN and gradually get higher in the healthcare field like she is doing now.
I am pleased to recommend Alissa Davis, who has been in several of my classes for the past three years. During that time, I have come to know her as a hardworking, motivated, and persevering student.
The first experience with Jalisa Scott from CADD was not what I expected at all. Jalisa Scott was so well kept and humble. Her presentation wasn’t long and drawn out, instead it was very inspiring and educational. I was captivated by what her job required of her and how she fulfilled her role faithfully no matter how difficult some situations were.
I feel that Carla Reese’s approach at Celeritas had potential to be effective, but in the end it proved to not have the intended effect. She did a good job in really diving deep into the main issues by doing the private interviews. By doing this she was able to get some good insight into what was causing the dysfunction at Celeritas. I also like that she made a point to address each of the main issues at the offsite. This had a positive effect in sparking discussion at the meeting.
I have the pleasure to recommend Cynthia Reyes, who I’ve know for four years now. She is a determined, thoughtful, and studious young lady who has impressed me with her diligence this year. Her academic work work reflects her dedication to giving forth her best effort and persevering through all subjects.
I do not really have any one person in mind for the best congressman/woman. If I had to choose, I would pick Alex Hudson. I am choosing him because he was very active during the duration of Mock Congress. He brought up several good points, along with asking good questions. Alex also seemed the most prepared on him speech, being that he had all the facts he needed for his speech memorized and did not need and
The actor I am going to choose is Helen Jones played by Natalie Brouwer. I was to start off by saying in my opinion she did a phenomenal job playing the part of Helen Jones. While watching the show I was not actively thinking of these thing, that being said they might not be one-hundred percent accurate. From what I remember Natalie was relaxed, to an extent. What I mean by that is that her character is tense and I am not quite sure how much that can and did play into her performance. But I did not see her struggling to remember lines or anything like that. Through her character's tension, Natalie had an ease about
I chose to interview Randy Bedsaul. He is an older gentleman who responds in a genuine manner. Since he works in my maintenance shop and I interact with him on a daily basis it was easy to ask him to do this interview. He responded quickly to my request and even stayed after work one day to help me out. To say I was thrilled would be an understatement. I really appreciate individuals who are willing to go the extra mile to help others in regards to personal/professional growth.
Donny Scanlon: He is one of the volunteers of the young Centre. Almost everyone likes him.
Jack Bernard would be the first choice for the job position. Aside from his professional demeanor, the fact that he arrived early and projected a great deal of enthusiasm and energy for the job demonstrates that he exhibits a strong amount of initiative and goal directedness. These two qualities are vital for the success of any organization. None of the positions he has on his resume shine or stand out with a certain amount of leadership or aplomb, but that's not as important as the character that Bernard projects. Bernard demonstrates that he clearly understands the importance of what it means to be a leader and knows how that needs to be accomplished. He has the solid work experience behind him to back that up. For example, one of the outstanding indicators of whether a person will be a good leader is whether or not they've shown: "Leadership in the past. The best predictor of the future is the past. When I was in business, I took note of any worker who told me he was superintendent of a school or a deacon in his church or a Boy Scout leader. If he showed leadership outside of the job, I wanted to find out if he had some leadership potential on the job" (nsba.org). One of the most outstanding facets of Bernard's resume is the fact that he financed 50% of his college education. This is clearly a quality of someone who is no stranger to hard work, organization and possesses a certain degree of fearlessness. Bernard was right to put such