Baylor Scott & White Healthcare Case Study

Many selections of healthcare plans are available for consumers to choose from to match their own personal needs, preferences and budget. The health care system is most often complex, inconsistent and costly. To maintain and improve the business, healthcare organizations are continuously innovative and evolving to meet the demands of consumers. The purpose of this paper is to discuss a case study of UnitedHealthcare Group, what they are about, their network and resource management, their view on nursing and how they satisfy their patients.

Baylor Scott & White Health is the largest not-for-profit health care system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States. Comprised of Baylor Health Care System, based in Dallas, Texas and Scott and White Healthcare, based in Temple, Texas, the two entities merged in October 2013 to provide a new vision and more resources while continuing to offer exceptional patient care (Baylor Scott & White, 2015). Baylor Scott & White Health includes “43 hospitals, more

Over the course of our countries history, the delivery of our health care system has tried to meet the needs of our growing and changing population. However, we somehow seem to fall short in delivering our goals of providing quality, affordable and accessible healthcare to our citizens. The history of our delivery system will show we continuously changed the delivery of our system however never mange to control cost. If we can come up with efficient ways to cut cost, the delivery of quality care will follow.

The successful evolution of this organizational structure in a competitive marketplace has required a close partnership between managers and physicians supported by a culture of physician group accountability for quality and efficiency. An overarching agenda for achieving excellence focuses on high-impact health conditions, provides goal-oriented tools to analyze population data, proactively identifies patients in need of intervention, supports systematic process improvements, and promotes collaboration between patients and professionals to improve health.

Even though Texas Health Resources approach is uninterrupted throughout this study with the sole purpose of endorsing of quality assurance and maneuvering to brand core measurements attained. The key to the leaders involved in this organization study is to convey, examine, make improvements, collaborate, and initiate changes within the hospital, which this study principally is engrossed on bringing crucial argument and descriptions to light. Precisely monitoring the study there were several references concerning how Texas Health Harris Methodist- Cleborne recuperated their performance and quality assurance by the 15th percentile from Texas Health Resources its parent organization. This organization 's theory used would be a resources dependence theory. Authority was assumed to this same organization Texas Health Resources with anticipation to produce and improve a new core resource model for clinical outcomes and this theory would be an independent variable theory. Numerous quality encouragements were set up for employees to promote their performances which demonstrates the hierarchy of needs theory. For the reason that, this demonstrates that the Texas Health Resources constructs all the results regarding what transpires and gives Texas Health Harris Methodist -Cleborne the approval to acquire a new position of clinical outcomes specialists, that what focus on the daily functions within their organization. Established on their discoveries, reports showed that part of her

Various internal and external factors influence quality management and outcomes in hospital organizations. One internal factor that affects quality management and outcomes is leadership within the organization. Leadership is important to have successful quality management outcomes because if the leadership does not support it, no change within the organization will be successful. “This commitment must be shared by the board of trustees and all senior clinical and administrative managers and understood that it is a long-term process” (Chassen and Leob, 2011). Leadership is one of the most influential internal parts of the quality management program. Leadership can either help the organization succeed with their support or help the organization fail if they do not support and follow

On paper, the merger between these two institutions made sense – both institutions were close to one another and competing for diminishing resources. Together they could reduce administrative costs and join forces to negotiate with large insurance companies. The need to create a new culture and dissolve historically existent power struggles were two large tasks that needed to be addressed in order to ensure a successful merger. However, the way in which the merger was organized did not lead to a successful merger. UCSF Health Care did not spend adequate time creating a shared culture in which the two organizations would see one joint organization with shared power (resources).

(MCOs) operating. The hospital group is the state’s largest not-for-profit organization and boasts an impressive performance plan, serving the healthcare needs of approximately 8 million citizens in Virginia. Moreover, Chesapeake Health Plans was the first organization to successfully attempt to request and obtain the highest level of accreditation from the National Committee of Quality Assurance (NCQA). Furthermore, Chesapeake health plans are structured to provide medical plans that cover services under the HMO’s, PPO’s, POS, and Medicare HMO’s. Chesapeake health plans attributes a considerable portion of their net service revenue generated to their effective HMO health plans, which realized a 46% of total revenue, while their Medicare HMO produced an impressive 39% of total revenue. Furthermore, their Preferred Provider Plan (PPO) generated 10%, and the Point of Service Plan (POS) saw a 5% figure. This case study financial analysis will effectively assess Chesapeake Health Plans: HMO financial performance, focusing on a competitive analysis, a cash flow analysis, clear profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, debt management ratios, asset management ratios, operating indicator analysis, a comprehensive financial assessment of Chesapeake’s financial state, as well as effective fiscal recommendations for their organization.

Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-Marble Falls (BSWMC-MF) represents one of two facilities and numerous clinics which make up the Hill Country Region of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) Central Texas Division. BSWMC-MF values interprofessional shared decision-making and uses multiple methods to include all members of the healthcare team in the process.

b. Baylor hospital wanted to establish a revenue stream for participating providers during the Great Depression

Jones Regional Medical Center is a huge academic health center with 900 beds and are known for its research and teaching hospitals. Additionally, the IT staff at Jones supports 300 applications and 12,000 workstations. The center uses Technology Med (TechMed) for their admitting system. The system includes registration, inpatient charge, payment entry, master patient index, admission, hospital billing, and more. The TechMed system has been accessible since 1998; Jones is beginning to plan a replacement of this systems because of the fragility of the software (Wager, 2013).

In the healthcare field, there are forces that drive practice and develop change within an organization. There are both internal and external forces in which not one organization is immune to (Kotter, 1996). By establishing a vision of the company, a sense of purpose and direction is created, working towards change within the forces (Huyer, 2014). When people participate in a vision, they work towards a common goal and identify what needs to be changed in order to reach that vision. In this paper, a presentation of Banner Health will be discussed, along with its mission and stakeholders, driving forces, viability, as well as an analysis of forces, a response to change, a vision for change, and an evaluation of change.

West Florida Regional Medical Center (WFRMC) located on the north side of Pensacola, Florida competed strongly with sacred heart and Baptist hospitals for patients. WFRMC’s CEO John Kausch was an active member of the Total Quality Council of the Pensacola Area Chamber of Commerce (PATQC) (McLaughlin, C.P., Johnson, J.K., & Sollecito, 2012).. PATQC’s vision was to develop the Pensacola, Florida area into a total quality community by promoting productivity, quality and economic developments in all area organizations both public and private (McLaughlin, et, al., 2012). John

The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program is a current model using certain criteria for purposes of improving quality and risk management. Health care organizations and risk managers around the country utilize this model to boost safety processes and outcomes. At the other end, a final goal is sought to reduce cost and get positive results for the organization. Criteria within the Baldrige model focuses on the successful operation of health care organizations that corroborate between units and departments, including leadership and performance, while also considering Joint Commission accreditation, Magnet status, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement initiatives (The National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2014). The goal of the Baldrige model is to lead all components of the organization to be unified and productive as a whole, manage change, and examine and analyze data in order to be competitive and successful in the healthcare market.

Quality is one of the most essential elements of healthcare. As stated by the Agency of Health Research and Quality, “Everyday, millions of Americans receive high-quality health care that helps to maintain or restore their health and ability to function” (Agency of Health Research and Quality, 2014). Improvements have become vital to the success of health care organizations and in the Healthcare Quality Book, it is explained that quality in the U.S. healthcare system is not at the standard that it should be (Ransom, Joshi, Nash & Ransom, 2008). Although this has been a reoccurring issue, attempts to fix the insufficiency have been less successful than expected.