Beginning of a Conflict after the Civil War

As the war continued on the industrial capabilities of the North would prove to become one of the greatest contributing factors to their ability to sustain military operations. Tied directly into the industrial capabilities of the North is the economical superiority that they held over the South. "The economy was the greatest Southern weakness; it was the North's greatest strength. The North was not only a huge farm but a sprawling factory as well" (Kennedy, Cohen, and Bailey pg. 439). Wars are expensive, and in order to sustain military operations especially one that would drag on for four years money would become of great importance. The North was comprised of approximately 75% of the nation's wealth, and they were able to maintain their trade with Europe which kept the money, and weapons pouring in. The South's inability to raise money took its toll on the pocket books of the Southern States, and in turn would be one of the major contributing factors to their defeat. A lengthy war on the other hand favored the wealthier and

The causes of most wars are often very complex, but in the America civil war it came down to two major issues, slavery and the protection of the Union. In the North, they were growing richer all the time as industry developed fast. The workers were mostly immigrants with low wages. The South didn’t have these resources, and the slaves were essential for them. The Northern politicians insisted that the Slavery should be abolished and that this was an evil system that should be stamped out. Only the rich wool farmers and other wealthy

“Why did the North win the Civil War?” is only half of a question by itself, for the other half is “Why did the South lose the Civil War?” To this day historians have tried to put their finger on the exact reason for the South losing the war. Some historians blame the head of the confederacy Jefferson Davis; however others believe that it was the shear numbers of the Union (North). The advantages and disadvantages are abundant on either sides of the argument, but the most dominate arguments on why the South lost the war would be the fact that state’s rights prevented unification of the South, Jefferson Davis poor leadership and his failure to work together with his generals, the South failed to gain the recognition of the European nations, North’s superior resources made the outcome inevitable, and moral of the South towards the end of the war.

There were many events that led to the civil war. Slavery was a big issue in the 1800s which led to small civil wars within our own country. The battle of Fort Sumter was the last battle leading to the civil war. Also the election angered many states created the Union and confederacy sides also causing the civil war.

Both sides in the civil were fighting for a reason, and both sides had their advantages and disadvantages. But why did the Union win,Was it because of their number of men, was it because the government was on their side, or was it because they were richer. The North (Union) actually won the civil war because they Government on their side,they had more men, had more money,and had a skilled military. One reason the north won the civil war is because they had more money than the south and they had more more people.

One of the most significant advantages the north (Union) had was regional advantage. The Union held twenty-three states, including four border slave states, while the Confederacy included eleven states. The population count was about 22 million in the Union to 9 million in the Confederacy, and about 4 million of the latter were enslaved African Americans. The Union therefore had an edge of about four to one in human resources. To help redress the imbalance, the Confederacy mobilized 80 percent of its military-age white men, a third of whom would die during the prolonged war (America, 655).

The Union was invading and fighting in the South, which was unfamiliar territory for them. This highlights the Norths disadvantage as they did not know where they would be most vulnerable. The Union also had to fight an offensive war, which meant they had to invade the So the, hold down occupied territory and capture Washington or New York to win the war. This proves that they had disadvantages as an offensive war is much harder to fight than a defensive one. Grant argues that “The South had a strategic advantage as the North was compelled to invade to force the South back into the Union”.

The North had way more railroads than the south. In comparison, the North had 22,000 miles of railroad while the south had only 9,000. More railroads led to more, faster ways of transporting soldiers, supplies, and weapons. In document C-1, “The Anaconda Plan,” the North had cut off the confederate’s exports and imports. This meant the North had more supplies and weapons; even though the south was still able to break through some of the blockade. The North still had the advantage. In document C-1 it says, “Although the union army suffered repeated defeats and stalemates in the east, victories in the western theater undermined the hopes for confederate independence.” This shows that the anaconda plan ended in the north’s favor. The North was able to sabotage the south and it worked. They then had the advantage of more exports, supplies, and ways for transportation, which helped in their

There were many issues back in the late 1800’s in America that led to the Civil War. There are also many factors that go into why the winning side won. The reasons, however great, can be split up into 4 categories: Geography, Economy, Society, and Transportation. Each of these topics we will discuss based on the North as well as the South. You’d be surprised by just how much one region is better off than the other.

“Why did the North win the Civil War?” is only half of a question by itself, for the other half is “Why did the South lose the Civil War?” To this day historians have tried to put their finger on the exact reason for the South losing the war. Some historians blame the head of the confederacy Jefferson Davis; however others believe that it was the shear numbers of the Union (North). The advantages and disadvantages are abundant on either sides of the argument, but the most dominate arguments on why the South

To attain success in any war both sides must conceive a strategy to have victory. In 1861, the armies of both the North and the South trudged off to war. Superior for both sides generated a procedure for victory. Violence throughout the Civil War took setting on three fronts, the East, the West, and the sea. The Union, arranged to obstruction all Southern ports, consequently keeping the South, from exchanging with Europe to cut off the South’s repository of manufactured merchandise. The Union would tackle command of the Mississippi River. This would keep the South from utilizing the river to contribute its soldiers and gash the Southern half, keeping Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas from the repose of the Confederacy. The Union would apprehend the southern capital of Richmond, Virginia where the Confederate government was discovered. The South prepared to fight a protective war. The Confederates wanted to escort the opponent into southern area that is unknown to them and overtire them. The Southerners were relying on help from Europe. They expected European countries would forward money and supplies in trade for cotton. The South wanted to incarcerate the Northern capital of Washington, D.C where the government of the Union was pinpointed. Both the North and South had advantages and disadvantages for winning the Civil War.

"Why did the North win the Civil War?" is only half of a question by itself, for the other half is "Why did the South lose the Civil War?" To this day historians have tried to put their finger on the exact reason for the South losing the war. Some historians blame the head of the confederacy Jefferson Davis; however others believe that it was the shear numbers of the Union (North). The advantages and disadvantages are abundant on either sides of the argument, but the most dominate arguments on why the South lost the war would be the fact that

The civil war was mainly sparked by tensions between the north and the south. Both sides rarely agreed on topics and could never make a compromise. Slavery was a big reason for the start of the civil war, but the causes don’t end there. Although some may say that political or economic reasons started the civil war between the north and the south, political reasons were the real cause. This is because of important decisions made by the government, and the south seceding.

At the beginning of the Civil War the reasoning was nothing but clear. It can’t be ignored that the Civil War was in fact about slavery and that slavery was an issue “resolved” by the Civil War. Yes the war was initially about race and how the country “needed” to free slaves, David W. Blight states it, “The emancipationist vision, embodied in African Americans’ complex remembrance of their own freedom, their politics of radical Reconstruction, and in conceptions of the war as the reinvention of the republic and the liberation of blacks to citizenship and Constitutional equality” (Blight, 2). The writer of this book, Race and Reunion, saw that the war

The cause of the civil war is debated and understood through multiple possible perspectives; social, political, economic, and religious. It is impossible to say that one factor or another had caused a certain chain of events, as all these factors interact with each other to various degree, and frequency. For the most part, the most common idea associated with the cause of the civil war would be to free the slaves, yet this idea is not entirely true. Yes, the civil war was fought over slavery, but not on whether slaves should be free or whether it is moral or not, but rather for the issues that slavery imposes when dealing with two contrasting economies that had developed in two different areas. The agrarian south had a socio-economic lifestyle based on slave labor, and the harvest of various crops, while the North had developed along the industrial revolution, forming modern transport through trains and canal, and diversifying in various economic ventures: banking, law, engineering, industrial agriculture, and transport. The difference in lifestyle would lead to an eventual debate when it came to the Missouri compromise of 1820 and again during western expansion;when slavery threatened white labor, and various economic policies were in favor of the North’s