Being Opulent Doesn T Guarantee A Happy Life

At the height of the transition of Philadelphia’s economy from agricultural to industrial, Philadelphia experienced a period of economic prosperity for almost all its citizens. Businesses were booming, new projects and development were established, the banking and commerce industries soared and a record number of jobs were created enabling the city to reach full employment rate, something that the city has yet to experience since. Citizens were confident in the government and financial institutions were equally confident in their citizens as evident by lax lending habits. As all good things typically come to an end, Philadelphia had an economic turn for the absolute worse. In 1920, the stock market crashed with several major bank failures and employment rate plummeted. The city then went through the worse financial time in the history of the U.S. known as the Great Depression. Citizens looked to their government for ways and means of ending the suffrage wreaking havoc on a once thriving and prosperous city. The significant increase in unemployment rate resulted in citizens losing trust and hope in the Republican Party, the party in power at the time. The New Deal initiative was then developed under President Roosevelt, which slowly ushered in the recovery of the economy and the city as a whole. The effects of the Great Depressions were alleviated to some degree; nevertheless the city struggled to achieve economic stability once more, but there was hope in sight. Despite the

How would you feel if you attended college, and the football players were paid to play? No one else would get payment of any kind for doing what they are scheduled to do in college, and most of the players on the team are going to college for a lesser price. These players are not paid now, but they should never be. Collegiate football players should not be paid to play. Firstly, barely any of them get to professional teams.

Anthropologist Thomas Gregor said that there are continuities of masculinities across cultural boundaries. If continuities concerning “manly” behavior are present among men of varying societies, why is this so? What is the reason for males to be placed under pressure to “act like a man” or to “man up” and why is it a common theme found in so many different places? Why do boys often find themselves in situations that are meant to test or indoctrinate them before they are allowed to be considered a man? Male and female are two distinctions that all societies make, and all provide roles appropriate for the two sexes.

possessions bring happiness, but only for a short amount of time. Studies by Ryan Howell,

She was fine with having just a few bucks in her pocket and didn’t really mind being poor. Even after growing up middle class, she kept her composure and didn’t break down often even though she didn’t seem like she had much to be positive about. The Faleau’s feel similarly to the Delgado’s in that they don’t need more. Their involvement with the Mormon church gives them fulfillment and satisfaction. All they have to obtain is the bare necessities and when they have those, they feel as if they are lucky to have them. The other families seem to be employing the coping strategy of “expecting and asking for more”. In the case of the Mah’s, they are upper class but still don’t feel like they have enough. They want their children to have the best of the best everything and keep them ahead of the curve so it keeps them feeling in need for more money. Similarly, the Calafato’s also don’t feel like they have enough. They aren’t upper class like the Mah’s but they’re still living a comfortable middle-class life. There reasoning for wanting more is to fund their children’s dreams and take the stress off of the mother who now has to work more often. Lastly, the Jenner’s who spend a lot on big-ticket items- are living paycheck to paycheck. The father has a stable income with great benefits but doesn’t really stop spending and this worries the wife. The wife wants more so she won't have to worry about

In “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde Loisel lives a middle class life with her husband, who is a clerk. She is unhappy about how average she thinks her life is and heavily desires the fulfillment money can bring her. Her attitude is more about what she can do for herself with riches and what attention she can attract, which later leads to the ruin of her life financially. In the song “Billionaire” by Travie McCoy, featuring Bruno Mars, McCoy sings about desiring the same kind of attention and money that Mathilde wants except he not only wants to benefit himself, but for others as well. Wealth is not necessarily a damaging thing to desire however, it is what people want to do with that wealth and status that

"Family always gonna be there. The material things, they come and go." This quote said by Romeo Miller explains how that if you don’t have material goods, just know you don’t them because no matter what your family will always be there for you no matter the case. Obviously this quote said by Romeo Miller shows that material goods are cool to have but they will not always be there, like your family will be. Since poor people have so little, they appreciate their family. Clearly family Flashy things/ material goods are not the distraction.

In the novel This Beautiful Life by Helen Schulman, published in 2011, a central theme is explored. Money surely cannot buy happiness. A picture perfect world is conveyed by the Bergamots and other families within the book. With further examination, the royal flush of life is quickly piled into a sad house of cards when the assumption is made that money can purchase happiness. It becomes a vehicle to the incognizant search for a distraction from their in actuality, somber life.

Maya Angelou once said, "You may encounter many defeats, but you must not be defeated. In fact, it may be necessary to encounter the defeats, so you can know who you are, what you can rise from, how you can still come out of it." Being opulent doesn't necessarily guarantee a happy life, especially as a parent, the struggles are still the same, and the pain never changes. This quote can also relate the Amanda's situation, because she seemed to be struggling as a parent of seven children, although she had plenty of money that she could use to her out.

“People who try to buy their way to happiness are often disappointed.” The reason for this is because you can’t buy happiness it comes from your family, the people around you and your physical surroundings. Some people try to buy themselves happiness and at some point in time they may be happy but it eventually does backfire on them because in the end no matter what money can’t buy you happiness.

Actually, parenthood has turned into a money related danger. Warren and Tyagi compose that “Having a child is now the single best predictor that a woman will end up in financial collapse” (Warren, Elizabeth, and Amelia Warren Tyagi. The Two-income Trap: Why Middle-class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke. New York: Basic, 2003. Print.) This book was composed over 10 years prior; things are much more terrible today.

Happiness is not how much you make or how many degrees you have or how big your house is or how fancy your car is. It is finding peace and joy and calmness in your life that will soon become the most important thing to you. Your family is what matters to you, love is what matters to you. Things that are of quality, not quantity. Crisanta Sampang’s article “Trading Motherhood for Dollars” is one case in a million where parents choose money over happiness.

As the most significant effect of wealth, having a substantial income has become a unique pursuit of many people, especially of young generation everywhere. If they have a vast amount of money, young people believe that they will be satisfied. However, they fail to see that happiness is not determined by money, but by having superior friends, family, and wonderful experiences.

In life we all have specific things that we want or we want to upgrade something we already have which both require money. We develop a craving for money and start to think about ourselves and what we want rather than what the family needs or wants. Craving more money and objects makes us more likely to be un-happy with our lives because we don’t have what we want or we don’t feel wealthy enough. Money often times gets in the way of our happiness because most things require money and we don’t have the amount needed to satisfy our wants. Someone who craves money and things could have every luxury they want and still be un-happy because they don’t feel wealthy. When an individual who craves wealth and things develops a family the kids will be spoiled as well and feel as though they deserve the same way and should have

caring of the price is evident that money can bring happiness to one’s life. Living life without limitations enhances a person to live with experience and adventure . Not having to fret over debts or not being able to travel are some peculiar positive outcomes of having money. Money aids in relieving stress created by pondering on being able to afford desires. Back then, living life subtly was the normality, but now in the twentieth century, living life lavishly is seen all around. To be able to partake in such lifestyle one needs a good amount of wealth to cover necessities as well as extravagant desires. Fashion icon Kendall Jenner, showcases what living life with abundance of money can do. The lavish life is reflected to a life of happiness.