Believing in Democracy for Nepal

The challenges that the country should face in the next years to accelerate and improve this democratization process are to ensure collective and individual rights for Indigenous people, a large group of people in the country, improve the judiciary system in cases of maladministration, allow and fund the political participation of independent candidates, professionalize the police forces, end rampant corruption in districts due to excessive powers of the authorities and drug cartels and reduce the gap between the rich and the poor by assuring balancing the salaries of public officials. These are ambitious goals but once the democratization process has been started it cannot be blocked especially if it is part of the national and international interest. Improving the transparency and public administration of a country increase its efficiency as well as its weight on the international community so the ability to make a difference when decisions are made at a global level, the goal that every country (not so) secretly

There are two types of democracies, direct democracy and representative democracy. As one would expect, the two are very similar. Direct democracy and representative democracy are both systems of government in which power lies with the people whom are govern though the power of voting. The power of voting is how both systems emphasis the importance of people’s rights. There is also a common sense of self-empowerment to the people being govern in both types of government due to this right. Furthermore, there is a mutual prominence towards majority rule in the two systems.

The positive part of the new constitution, from the Madhesi perspective, is that it will regulate republic and federalism. Be that as it may, numerous different parts of the new constitution are more backward than the Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007. Out of every one of its lacks, the most outstanding one concerns the issue relative representation or incorporation in all organs of the state.

Political reform is often resulting in increased demands of oppressed and weaken state. New democracies tend to have security problems and questions of the democratic governance. The state must instill stability and social control; thus a weak state will fail. Democracy, however, can achieve peace by allocating power through elections, manage diversity without violence, and create political positions. State and nation-building, integration, and a development of a unified ideology can be a strategy to promote democratic consolidation.

Transitioning the political institution usually starts from a position of high autonomy and high capacity, a system without any checks. A new government will out to be outlined. This will include the establishment of a constitution that outlines person freedoms. Judicial, executive and legislative systems need to be implemented. Governance around elections and parties must be established. The US based, Freedom House ranking ranks democracy based on different criteria, including electoral competition, freedom of speech/assembly, rule of law, levels of corruptions and protection of human rights. This

Majority rule government and participatory administration are prominent political ideas in this day and age. Reasonable and free decisions are the key pre-essential of vote based system. Be that as it may, vote based system needs substance unless the constituent procedure is combined with the amazingness of the constitution, the principle of law, and common and political rights and flexibilities for the general population. The state must practice the guideline of equivalent citizenship independent of religion, rank, ethnicity and provincial foundation. It should likewise guarantee correspondence of chance to just for headway in social, financial and political areas and surety security of life and property of its subjects.

Democracy is that type of government in which the decision force of a state is legitimately vested not in a specific class or classes, but rather in the individuals from the group all in all. it is a legislature in which the will of he greater part of subjects tenets without overriding the rights o the minority. The perfect of the vote-based system is that of equity, flexibility, and welfare for all. it includes the cancelation of the exceptionally type of confinement and benefit. Antiquated majority rule government depended on the immediate cooperation of the masses in broad daylight issues. Present day vote based system is illustrative in character and it requests widespread grown-up suffrage, as well as the dynamic investment of the general

Executive Summary: In 2001, the Bonn agreement laid out the framework for a democracy in Afghanistan, however, the transition to democracy has been met with many challenges. The establishment of a bicameral legislature, popularly elected president, and the restoration of civil liberties showed hope for democratization, but the institutions established in the country fail to provide the stability needed for Afghanistan to successfully transition to a democratic regime (Zain 84; Reynolds 104,105). New electoral systems are essential to providing stability and legitimacy to democracy in Afghanistan and balancing ethnic interests in a nation marked by strong ethnic cleavages.

Being born and raised in Nepal, I quickly noticed how the absence of legal and social policies perpetuated an environment of violence and inequalities for many of its marginalized citizens. Incorporating

It is defined as a rule of the majority: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. (Democracy). According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, “It consists of four key elements: First, a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections, the active participation of the people in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights, and finally, a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens.” Elections are held wherein citizens are given full freedom to vote for the candidate they feel can fully represent their wants and needs. Therefore, the main principle behind democracy is that of representation. People can remove a government if it does things that they do not agree with. Most importantly, the strongest argument in favor of democracy does not relate to what democracy does to the government but to what democracy does to its citizens. It enhances their dignity. This is where democracy rushes quite ahead of other forms of government. Democracy brings rights and freedoms, equality and justice. There are no restraints on thoughts, speech, religion, and the

Democracy has become the most widespread political form of government during the past decade, after the fall of all its alternatives. During the second part of the 20th century, the 3 main enemies of democracy, namely communism, fascism and Nazism, lost most of their power and influence. However, democracy is still only to be found in less than half of this world's countries. China with a fifth of the total population "had never experienced a democratic government" and Russia still doesn't have a well established democracy. By adopting a democratic perspective, 3 types of governments emerge, non-democratic, new democracies, and old democracies, and all have a different challenge to overcome: either to become democratic, to "consolidate"

Through the study of human history it is evident authoritative and monarch governments prevailed as legitimate authorities but with careful considerations these political systems were seen as inaccurate by many. New political systems, functions and responsibilities soon began to surface. Democracy was among these new political systems and argues for the influence of citizens in politics and the protection of rights (Dahl, 1998, p. 44). Democracy can be found through many political systems around the world particularly in first world countries such as Canada and the United States of America. Fortunately the notions of democracy can also be found in some developing countries such as India. ¬¬¬Although democratic views and notions are found throughout Indian politics and its associated practices India does not prove to be completely democratic in relation to Robert Dahl’s criteria of democracy highlighted in his book, On Democracy. Robert Dahl, a political scientist and professor, sets up 5 criteria of democracy that includes effective participation, voting equality, enlightened understanding, inclusion and control of agenda (Dahl, 1998, p. 36-7). He argues that a sense of true democracy is founded when all 5 criteria of democracy are fulfilled (Dahl, 1998, p. 36). Unfortunately India is unable to accommodate the criteria of voting equality and effective participation due to its

The creation and manipulation of representative institutions as democracy decorations help authoritarians in providing legitimate governance and ensure political survival. Authoritarians face challenges from representative institutions such as the legislative, judiciary,

Since the initiation of the Third Wave of Democracy, several countries have attempted to form a democratic system of governs. We take note that not all have succeeded. At the dawn of this era, democracy was being applied to countries with no prior history of a governing body that was place by the people for the people hence success of such a system could not be guaranteed because of the innumerous variables that existed in each country. People being the highlighted factor of variance, it may become easier to understand how countries such as Pakistan and Nigeria, both countries prior to the Wave had no local governing machinery. Pakistan further endured a partition from India which resulted in not only an instant religious and

The author has been able to fulfill the target of the book, which is to test and answer the questions raised by critics through the provision of evidence of the reason no democracy exists at the present. The author presents the arguments in a chronological way that gives a better understanding of the past, today, and prospective future of democracy. The root of the present democracy is stated in the book and lays the basis of the other arguments in the book. Dahl argues that there are conditions that any state should attain in order for it to be considered as a democratic