preview

Ben Shahn's The Passion Of Sacco And Vanzetti

Decent Essays

Ben Shahn’s painting The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti highlights the discrimination immigrant groups, as outsiders, face in many aspects of the American experience, particularly that before the justice system. Shahn effectively argues that the American systems, as a result of prejudice and hostility towards immigrants, can be incredibly unjust and abusive. He does so through his specific use of colors, the symbolism of the figures he chose to use, and the framing of his painting. The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti is made with tempera and gouache on canvas mounted on composition board. It was painted by social realist Ben Shahn in the years of 1931 and 1932 as a criticism of the infamous American Sacco and Vanzetti case …show more content…

In naming the painting The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti, Shahn is drawing parallels between Jesus Christ and Sacco and Vanzetti. Interestingly, Jesus Christ was also an immigrant who was wrongly accused of a crime and executed mainly out of hatred and bigotry. He preached treating others, especially strangers of foreigners, with kindness and understanding. It should be assumed that Shahn knowingly and willingly decided to name his painting this way in order to invoke images of Jesus Christ and his unfair death. Another important aspect of the painting is the color scheme. The colors used in the painting, especially those used for the courthouse, mimic the dark and indifferent environment that Sacco and Vanzetti were subject to during their trial. The courthouse uses neutral colors like beige, black and brown to represent the cold neutrality of the courts towards the accused. For example, “Some observers recalled an icy courtroom atmosphere, where the hostility towards immigrants was almost palpable” (33). He does a good job of using those neutral colors and the feelings our minds associate them to. The courthouse takes up much of the space in the painting and its presence is intimidating in its seriousness and hostility. Its colors emphasize the aloofness afforded to Sacco and Vanzetti. Also, the red around the neck of the man in the middle symbolizes the …show more content…

Apparently, it took the judge, who stands at the window of the courthouse, hypocritically holding up his right hand in a sign of honesty, three hours to deem guilty the accused. “Honorable they may have been, but when facing what they view as a crisis, those in power will generally do what they deem necessary to protect an established order in which they occupy positions of privilege” (33). It can be seen in the faces of the men that though they are in honorable positions of power, their ideas about justice and fairness were quickly distorted. Shahn painted the men with bored-looking and cold faces. Even the smaller details of the painting hold great importance. Frame of the painting and the scale of the figures implies something: the person viewing the scene depicted in the painting is doing so intimately, from a close range, as if invited to the funeral: the viewer is a bystander like the three men who convicted Sacco and Vanzetti. For example, even now “the response of many majority Americans has been to support measures that place large portions of the immigrant populations under suspicion and state surveillance” (35). Shahn is trying to say that everyone, America as a whole and Americans, watched on as Sacco and Vanzetti were killed and did nothing. Like no one helped

Get Access