Benefits Of Being A Locavore

Locavorism has both strong supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn’t a bad idea: it can connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However — as with all topics — it isn’t all black and white. Many common locavorism arguments aren’t grounded in science, and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering locavorism should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Many people are not sure whether the locavore movement is the right route to take, however, Americans are not aware of the positive things it brings to its community. The taste and quality of their produce will improve, along with nutritional factors. Making

The local sustainable food chain is a great deal better for the environment than any of the other food chains. It is way better than the other food chains because the farmers that

In the end, it becomes troublesome to go grocery shopping. Likewise, this ties into the idea of environment. Which is more environmentally friendly: to walk to a local Whole Foods or to drive to the “local” farmer’s market? Many would say buying local reduces waste due to transportation; nonetheless, a chart from the magazine Conservation Magazine proves that a majority of gas emissions actually comes from the production of the food (Source D). Transportation is low already, so why should we add to that by traveling far distances? Becoming a true locavore for an environmental reason is not worth the efforts because the changes are very miniscule To become a true locavore has many incentives, but there are other reasons that influence can someone to dedicate a portion of their diet to local foods.

The locavore movement is a powerful and extremely healthy movement; it cuts down on transportation, supports a town’s economy, and helps encourage society to consume healthier foods. It is a powerful movement that would be great to the community in many ways. It would not just benefit some people in the community but everybody individually. It is also an amazing way to bring the people in the community together.

A new type of agriculture, locavore, is becoming larger and larger, the locavore lifestyle is promised to give anyone who lives it a healthy life. locavore is the practice of only consuming locally grown foods. Joining the locavore movement and eating locally grown foods is more healthy and helpful to the human body, but forcefully changing Americaʼs diet would prove to be dreadfully difficult, not to mention the negative impact it will have on the economy, including the fact that eating local foods is not the only way to stay healthy .There are many issues that must be taking into account before determining whether a transition so large would truly benefit any community or wreak havoc.

Hi, Ella! Kliman addresses many pros and cons of buying local foods! Just to name a few, Kilman begins by explaining that "local reduced our 'carbon footprint'" because trucks do not have to travel as far to deliver fresh produce (Kilman 67). We are made to believe that local foods change the system entirely, however, this is not really the case. Kilman provided a statistic that "local and organic foods currently make up 3 percent of food consumption in America" (Kilman 67). In the long run, this small amount of percentages does not do as much as consumers think it does. People often argue that local food is fresher and overall better, but Kilman says that "local is not inherently fresher, nor is it inherently better" (Kilman 68). Since the

Americans today seem to believe that the world should join the locavore movement- when one chooses to primarily eat locally grown or produced products- that has become popular in the past decade. With joining this movement, many people believe their lives and the community will greatly improve. While critics defend that this change in lifestyle has shown very small improvements in the last ten years, supporters of this campaign argue that it benefits the economy, their health, and the environment.

Let’s be honest, who actually wants to live in a locavore community? You can receive fresh fruits including enough nutrients from your local grocery store or farmers market. Source B states, “ fresher foods that are grown on high quality soil are going to have more nutrients. But people are not nutrient-deprived. We’re just not nutrient deprived.” Just think about it. There will be absolutely no sweet snacks

Today, in America, the locavore movement consists of people eating food that is grown or produced locally. This community strives to live a nutritious and environmentally sustainable lifestyle. While some people have the financial resources to go to the farmers market, whole foods, and other grocery stores that sell products produced locally, not everyone does and often these foods that are sold locally cost more than food some one would find in their basic store. The locavore movement is a response to industrialized food production, monocropping, factory farms, and all of the pollution that is being emitted from those food manufacturers. It is unrealistic for America to adopt locavorism; there is an ambiguous definition of locavorism, there

I picked up a sweet, fresh, bright red apple at the farmer's market. The tangy smell of the apple makes me hungry, knowing I’m getting the freshest and most nutritious apple. Though is it really any different from the apple grown 300 miles away? The locavores are people who decided to eat locally grown produce, this has become known as the locavore movement and is quickly becoming widespread among more people. But, is a locavore movement really needed? The fact is, there is no difference between local produce and produce that was grown hundreds of miles away. The locavore movement may not make a huge difference.

Supporters of the locavore movement often cite nutrition as an important benefit to eating locally. They often associate locally-produced food with health and freshness, just by virtue of being grown close by. Many locavore advocates argue that food quickly loses nutrients while travelling, but their evidence is shaky at best. Furthermore, people with globally-sourced diets aren’t exactly lacking in nutrition. As stated by Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, “...people are not nutrient-deprived.” (Smith and MacKinnon) While local food will usually be fresher to some degree, the actual health benefits are marginal.

The locavore movement can provide more the local economy. A study conducted by the New Economics Foundation provided the results of how the local economy is benefited by eating locally. A dollar that would be spent locally will generate twice as much income for the local economy (Source A). Along with the benefits to the local economy, the ways food miles are calculated are flawed. If you were to ship 2,000 apples 2,000 miles, it would calculate to be the same as a shipment of 50 apples 50 miles. The locavore movement focuses on miles traveled rather than the apples per gallon that are being transported (Source C).

Nutritious. Healthier. Reduction of Carbon emission. All of these are positive aspects of local food right? Concealed under these factors lie environmental destruction as well as a damaged economy. The Locavore Movement has been on the rise due to its nutritional benefits, however, this overshadows the effects of locally grown food on our environment and economy.

My experience on the Locavorism project had me encounter and face many obstacles and difficulties that I've never really faced during any project I have ever done. It required me to use and apply what little practical, creative and analytical thinking I had to design a reasonable proposal to a situation given to me. I know I am now an ACC student; a “college student” with much more responsibilities, and looking back on my work on this project, I can say that most of it was not what I hoped it would be; efficient, proactive, hardworking or well thought out. At the moment it felt like I was doing my best, that I was working hard to achieve this task, but not at the level it could've been at. Me and my group should've spent more time analyzing