Benefits Of Lowering The Voting Age

In my position I agree to lower the age of voting to 16-17 years old because it can raise up the percentage of voting. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. Also it can gives them experience on what's the voting like. Once they get older, they will know what to do because they registered the vote in an

The 26th Amendment to the Constitution was ratified in 1971, giving eight-teen year olds the right to vote. Forty four years later the voting age still remains set at eight-teen but is it time for a change?

In the article “Why We Should Lower the Voting Age to 16.” by Lawrence Stein-berg, the author suggests that teenagers at the age of sixteen and up should have the same voting rights as legal adults. Steinberg’s main argument is that teenagers pos-sess “cold cognitive abilities” which allow adolescents to “gather and process infor-mation, weigh pros and cons, reason logically with facts and take time before making a decision.” Steinberg also addresses that humans generally do not fully develop until the age of 22 and do not possess “hot cognitive abilities” which he says “Hot cognitive abilities are those we rely on to make good decisions when we are emotionally aroused, in groups or in a hurry.” Lawrence Steinberg says that these cognitive abilities are backed by “neuroscientific findings”. The authors secondary argument is that there are several other countries that allow people

Voter turnout would be much larger if we lowerd the age requirment, because a bigger percent of the population would be able to vote. Our young people need to be more involved in our government.

What are children aged 13-17 thinking about? They are thinking about friends, music, homework, after school sports teams and part-time jobs. Students should not be able to vote when they enter high school. High school students are overwhelmed with new responsibilities and freedoms and are not prepared to focus on political issues at this time of their lives. High school students don’t have the life experience necessary to know how politics work. High school students’ brains are not fully developed therefore they often have difficulty making decisions that take consequences into account.

After reading both passages about keeping or lowering the voting age, I have come to a conclusion to keep the voting age at 18. I agree that lowering the voting age would decrease the percentage of participation.

My opinion of lowering the voting age is, that they should leave it at 18, because if they lower the age to 16 many young people dont care about voting ,or they have no knowledge about who to vote for, they are just going to vote randomly, with out knowing who is the perfect candidate. I think that the best way to increse the percentage of voters is by allowing people to vote from home, or having alot of voting places, because most of the people dont like to go far,or like to be in crowded places, leaving the age at 18 will also be a good thing ,because most of the people 18 and oldther have more kwnoledge on who to vote for, because they know who is trying to do the right things for there country. Most of the arguments of lowering the age

Although, some believe the age of 18 should be the minimum voting age, I would have to argue that the voting age should be lowered. I beleive the percentage of participation would increase during electons, if voting age is lowered. Our younger generation generates valuable opinions about presidental elections and should be alowed to vote at the age of 16. The United States would greatly benefit from lowering the voting age.

People are arguing a point that is pretty insignificant to the political world . i think lowering the voting age would be harmful to voters because 16 year olds are typically not worried about politics . Changing the voting age by any amount would not be fair to the percentage of younger voters that are active from ages 18- 24 ( The u.s cencus bureau reported 36% of them voted in 2012 ) , But there would be a even less percentage of active voters if the voting age was reduces by 2 years from 18 to 16 . Im betting maybe a third of 16 year olds would be interested in voting and presidential elections are held every four years and their would be a healthy portion of 16 year olds that would turn 18 when it is time for election . So why

In this articles we have two controversis about the voting age, they are arguing if the current voting age of 18 should be maintainined or lowered. One of the articles believe that lowering the age would decrease the porcentage of participation, they propose a solution for that instead lowering the age of voting, they should allow people to vote from home, that would raise the percentage of votings. On the other hand we have the author of Lower the Voting Age's opinion, he says that lowering the voting age by two years woul have many positive results. In my opinion they sould keep the voting age at 18 because young people don't know what they want.

Why would they even want to lower the voting age? I believe, that the current voting age should be left at 18. Voters who are older take things more seriously. If they were to lower the voting age to 16 they probably would take it as a joke.

Lowering the voting age would decrease the numbers of voters. Many teenagers do not bother to vote at all. According to the first article Keep the voting age at 18, includes that "Only 38% of voters in the 18_24 age group voted in 2012. By contrast, close to 70% of older voters participicated." This shows most younger voters lack of interest of voting. Another reason, the 16-18 age group young

Lowering the voting age could help out as well. If more kids who know what the right choice is in voting can vote in would even out the voting percentage. Also lowering the voting age could increase the turn out number for our country. Being eighteen is just a number but at the same time its how much you've gone through and life and how intelligent you can be. Lowering the age to vote could help us and it could hurt us.

Teenagers should care about politics, even though there not old enough to vote because it helps them get prepared for the future when they vote for their future president of the United States. Not just teenagers should learn about politics but also children should learn about politics it will soon benefit them when they’re older and they want to elect someone someday when they are old enough to vote for a president and it will help them know what they’re looking for in a president. Some of the reasons why citizens vote for president is because they can make a difference by choosing. Some people who have the ability to vote and those people don’t take that chance to make a difference in their life because once there president there and tell

I believe lowering the voting age for the following reasons, does not make sense. The voting participation percentage is already at a low rate, why dig ourselves deeper by widening our age range to non participants, 16-17 years olds are not showing much interest in politics. If we lower the voting age to 16, we will be trying to catch a blind eyes attention. At 16, what were you and a majority of your friends working towards? Your license. Around this age kids are into highschool parties, sports they are active in and staying up late, studying for the civics test the next morning, not politics. There is one reason for that alone, because they are kids.