Benefits Of Video Games A Form Of Art

Aaron Smutz, a philosophy professor at Rhode Island College, in his rhetorical essay “Are Video Games Art?” asserts that video games are indeed art. He first puts forward three critically well-received games to be considered art, then determines what can be used to determine art by considering “sister media” like art and music as well as competition such as chess, football or ice-skating. After establishing an “informal” definition of art, Smutz comes to conclude that since the games he provided cover several facets of game-types and since those games can reasonably fall into the definitions provided of art, then most video games should be considered art. Smutz forms his essay in order to explore the artistic merit of games. Smutz also writes

Another issue people have with video games being classified as a sport is the mental health issue. They say people lose a sense of reality. Well this could all be avoid to to one simple task, adequate limits of video gaming. Video games are okay to play, but not overly excessively. You can take regular breaks like reading, walking, going outside for fresh air, etc.

Although Ebert did not engage with the issue again and his view remains mired in controversy, the notion that video games are ineligible to be considered fine art due to their commercial appeal and structure as choice-driven narratives has proved persuasive for many including video game luminary Brian

Do you think that someone playing a video game and someone playing football are both enjoying their favorite sport? The correct answer is no, video games are not a sport like football, basketball, baseball, etc. Video games should not be considered a sport because they can lead to bad health, they do not fit the definition of a sport, and they mostly target a younger audience.

Video games are a profound art form, incorporating trades and mediums that span the artistic spectrum and beyond. To refute this is to ignore decades of rich history, disregard hours of artful labor, and discredit the immeasurable devotion of many whom worked to perfect this art form. Although video games may not suit every individual’s tastes, one cannot claim with credibility they possess no artistic merit.

disbelief about video games not being considered art. In the article by Nick Gillespie, Are Video

It is true that there have been many debates over this topic of video games but most people don’t really understand the world of video games and technology. In “Dream Machine” by Will Wright explains to us that many people only view video game as a negative and don’t think beyond that point. “Most people on the far side of the generational divide-elder-look at games and see a list of ills (They’re violent, addictive, childish, worthless).” (Wright 211). I believe that there are a few flaws in playing video games. There are a few games out there that have crude acts of violence, language, and also display sexual material. There are labels on them to help parents know what their children are playing. However, not a lot of people know that there are also a positive side of playing video games. Non-gamers need to understand that playing video games can enlighten the mind of people. It can help with creativity and imagination is one of the main benefits of playing video games. “They [videogames] will allow us to express ourselves, meet others, and create things that we can only dimly imagine.” (213) I strongly agree with what Wright is stating, it is amazing how people can play with each other around the world and also there are some games with good problem solving and also how to work as a team. Technology devices are also a big part of the argument, it can of prevent us from speaking face to face and it has a different way to communicate around the

Video games are great entertainment for all ages, however they shouldn’t be considered a sport as they don’t provide any type of real effort of training and skill. Anyone can play a video game, all you need a pair of hands, maybe one if you have the right console, rather than traditional sports like football, basketball, soccer, and so on. These sports actually require intense physical exercise, skill, and training, while video game players just sit there and twiddle their thumbs to score points. You may believe this to be true but nevertheless video games actually require the same amount of skill as traditional sports. “A sport is an activity involving physical exertion and skill in

Video Games to many, are a way to escape reality and get into their “zone” and do things only imaginable in virtual reality. For others, it's a stress reliever. Then there are those who see it as a horrendous creation that should

Games are very popular nowadays and people can now pick and chose a game they wish to play. However some games can be fun for them while others may find some very bad. All games however have something that makes them interesting, such as an adventure, strategy, and powerful characters if they have any. These pull people into their franchise thus making them very popular and enjoyable to many many players.

In conclusion video games should be considered a sport or a virtual sport. It should be considered one because it is somewhat similar to a sport. Gamers train just like athletes do to become better and be the best. They play in arenas and have many fans to cheer them on just like a real sports event. If golf and chess are sports then playing video games should be considered as one as

In the article written by Roger Ebert, “Video Games Can Never Be Art”, he discusses his view on why video games should not be considered art. In the beginning Ebert explains why he thinks today’s video games can not compare to modern art, furthermore they will not ever be close to poets or filmmakers work (Ebert). Ebert then brings up the Ted talk with Santiago where he states, “No one in or out of the field has ever been able to cite a game worthy of comparison with the great poets, filmmakers, novelists and poets” (Ebert). What he is trying to say here is that when gamemakers are creating video games they will never equal up to their artistic ability of these different types of artist. Then he mentions how video games are not art because

Personal Response: “Are Videogames Art?” I consider any form of creative production a type of art. Stanton states in his article: “to each their own.” therefore, in my opinion, anything created that can cause a person to become immersed within it and feel some sort of emotion is a form of art, including video games. I don’t typically play games per say, but when I do spend my time playing or even watching games such as “Final Fantasy” I can’t help but feel overcome with emotion when a character dies or when characters fall in love.

I’m still reading a bunch and my current book, Extra Lives, is essentially critical theory on video games as literature. This divide between what makes something ‘art’ is something I’m kinda big on, so it’s a fascinating read. There’s one thing that Tom Bissell says which struck me: that because video games must be, by nature, fun, they’re seen as being less artistic or literary than other mediums.

Many video games use visuals to mentally immerse gamers into a virtual world filled with seemingly living, breathing people, animals, or cities. According to Michael Samyn and Auriea Harvey, game designers for Tale of Tales, video games increasingly develop into a true medium of artistic expression (Lamb). In just forty years, video games transformed from an abuse of the new computer for entertainment purposes into a sophisticated form of popular art. The development of video games recently produced results that arguably equal other similar, representational arts. Video games share many qualities with other forms of art, but they are also artistically significant in their own way. “This seems to be something