Bernard Monologue From The Sick Educaiton

He, obviously, is the narrator, and the person whom we see the story through. He gives us his opinions on the matters at hand, and we see the book through his viewpoint. The traits described above allow him to be such a great narrator, for he can get people to confide in him, and relay this information to the reader.

The organization and transitions take away from his actual writing. He jumps from one idea to another and it is not clear what the point is at that specific moment. One example of this is when he jumps from masculinity, to a short paragraph about femininity, then abruptly back to the problems with being a male.

I shivered and looked at the gun, and then threw it away from myself, back up on the bank, near the pile of ashes. Eyes filled with dread, I sank to my knees and covered my face with my hands. The wind whipped back and forth but all I could do was stare at the person who once was my friend. Slim’s voice shouted. “George. Where you at George?”

I didn’t think I would like this book simply because I knew that it has existentialist themes which I was never fond of. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern was confusing and I probably would have liked it more if I saw it live as an actual performance. However, I do like how Meursault has clear actions and thoughts even though I don’t believe in all of them. Like when he is pretty much indifferent to Raymond’s abusive nature. But somehow he pitties Salamano’s dog. That whole point is confusing to me like I don't understand if Meursault is just bad at seeing the similarities or what.

. I didn’t like the way he wrote the novel. I didn’t like it because he exaggerated a bit. He should write fiction novels.

As a reader my reaction to the author was really inspiring because even thought he had a hard childhood, he kept his head up and kept doing what he had to do to successes and make his mother happy. Also the way

I, personally, loved the author's writing, although I did not really understand why she structured the book like so. With each chapter changing different perspectives and stories, it was kind of hard to remember which chapter went with another considering the chapters where out of order. With each story, I was a little annoyed that they just suddenly ended at the end of the chapter. It made me want to read more and more trying to find the next chapter that went with that person's story. It was also kind of difficult to connect the stories. Other than that, she did a marvelous job grabbing my attention. I loved the analogies that she included in the stories. For example, on page 216- 217, one of the mothers told her daughter about a turtle that eats her tears and then creates birds that laugh

What I loved about his books is that they are stories in themselves but at the same time they dive deep into topics and subjects that were relevant when they were published and still of great importance today. Many books hit on topics such as equality, Individualism, strict governments and social unjust. From reading from these types of authors I feel it has improved my writing. I see how they are all writing and making a point, but when doing so they make you feel a part of the story with the dialogue, imagery and diction that they each use in their writing. Its makes me think more when

He paid more attention to the working conditions, environment than the emotions of his character. Though the book was written in this manner he gave enough information on the characters to parallel the traditional values and morals of the Americans who would read the book. By doing this it created empathy in the hearts of those who read his novel; the reader would be able to envision his or her own life in the same situation.

The next day Lennie and I enter a bunkhouse room with whitewashed walls and unpainted floor. There were about eight bunks, some have blankets some don’t, over each bunk there were these apple box that were made to put in our own personal belongings. There was also little regular daily life’s supplies in the room, including razors, magazines, medicines and all kind of stuff loaded in the shelve, there were even a big table for playing cards. As the old man address Lennie and I into this new work place, he give us instruction to where we will be resting tonight, he told us that the boss was expecting us last night and will be furious if find us there this morning, I walk over the bed and suddenly I see a yellow can on the ground, now I wonder what kind of disgusting bed is he giving us?

Every author has a different style of writing. They create different works all their own. With that being said, each creates its own characters. Some may be very relatable, whereas others may seem as foreign as a creature from Neptune. They can both be interesting however. You may meet someone who is completely opposite of you, versus meeting someone who is practically the equivalent to you. There tend to be very few of these but you can generally find someone is fairly similar.

It is difficult for the reader to feel much affection for the protagonist in Wolff’s memoir. Do you agree?

I enjoyed her writing style over all. I enjoyed every other character in the book but there was never enough time away from Jules Jacobson. I love the plot. I really wish I could go on so I can see what happens with the characters but even when I skipped to the end of the book, Jules was still behaving in a way that I just couldn’t stand.

Considering his books are all located in different countries provide the evidence that he is an expatriate writer, therefore his quote would be seen as correct about himself. He often writes about the experiences he experienced in other countries while he was still a journalist. His experiences give him the information for him to create his excellent yet somewhat dark pieces of literary work which explains why his novels have a dark twist to them. He doesn’t mind putting in the facts whether it an acceptable topic or if it will offend anyone. He will put out all the parts which is part of the reason his books are so great. You never know what could come up or where it will happen, which explains the reason his books have a good reputation. The books written by him keep you intrigued and on your toes through all 700 pages of the novel, therefore you never get tired of what you’re

The satire that he like to use was very sarcastic and he used this to his advantage. He was very good at making up people and the stories that went along with these people. Each and every character had a place to fill in the sortie. His stories were made to either get under the skin of his audience or to improve the knowledge of the reader. His satire in this stories gives understand and passage to any reader or