Bryan Sherwood OIT ID: 918214744 PHIL 342 8/14/2015 Whistleblowing is the act that employees commit when they cry foul on their own organization for misdoings, corruption and illegality. I shall argue that whistleblowing in the workplace is “sometimes permissible” in order to keep businesses and corporations in check. I shall do so by presenting the best argument for whistleblowing to be “sometimes permissible” and not “always permissible”. The argument for whistleblowing will focus on the issue of whether or not whistleblowing is “permissible always” or “permissible sometimes”. Individuals who agree with the permissible always will claim that corporations are not the kinds of things that we can owe loyalty to. Proponents for being “permissible …show more content…
We would state that the purpose of a business group is solely to generate profits and nothing more. Businesses are different than groups since they are not dependent upon the individual but rather on the focus of increase profits. Families, groups of friends are places that have to “take you in no matter what”. They exist for the mutual benefit and support of their members, but businesses do not operate this way. Businesses benefit you and support you because doing so is profitable. When individuals conduct premium work and benefit the business, it is only to further the business. The business is not meant to benefit the members, except for an available …show more content…
This viewpoint has three elements and abides by: reductive view, super emergent view, and minimally emergent view. The reductive view states that individuals in a class may be to each student, and nothing more. If we are loyal to the class, or classmates, then we state that we are loyal to most or all members taking this class. While the argument “permissible always” was able to provide an explanation why we are to not feel loyal to corporations, it doesn’t mean that their argument is true. I shall now examine what I see as the best powerful against “permissible always”. While the argument appears above, there are more factors to be considered than just blowing the whistle. We need to weigh the gravity of the situation. If the matter being considered is of utmost danger to the company and could be In order for accusations to be received well, they have to be genuine. Cases must consist of genuine, immediate and specific threats on which the whistle can be blown on. However, if my claim as an employee of Toyota is discreet about their cars being built with poor parts like the Ford Pinto, my claim is not valid as it doesn’t hold specific action’s on what they are doing. Although it might be immediate and genuine, it would lack specificity. REWRITE
In addition, whistleblowers should be portrayed as being good in order for society to begin seeing them in a positive way. Furthermore, the government should make this type of crimes a public matter. Allowing the public to be able to see all charges and outcome regarding these cases could bring out other wrongdoings in other organizations. The government should also impose greater punishment such as jail time for these types of crimes rather than imposing fines that they are able to
Review “Just pucker and blow: An analysis of corporate whistleblowers” in Chapter 2. Please respond to the following:
For many whistleblowers, fear of persecution and retaliation has prevented them from speaking out against improper behaviors at their institutions. Because of the dangers that whistleblowers are exposed to, many companies have become proactive in promoting and protecting whistleblowing. As a case and point, we need to look no further than the banking giant, Barclays.
Whistle blowing does take courage. There is the risk of being bullied or harassed as a result, but anyone who whistle blows has the right to protection from the person they have raised concerns about. If you suffer as a result of a whistle blowing incident the UK Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 offers legal protection.
In Ronald Duska’s “Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty,”Duska describes the conflict that occurs between the act of whistleblowing and the obligation for an employee to be loyal to their employer. To understand this conflict, one must first understand what a whistleblower is, a whistleblower is one who spotlight neglect or abuses within their own professional organization. The conflict occurs because an individual is incriminated their own workplace, which can cause conflict among the employees and the employer. The question becomes is whistleblowing ethical? Or is it unethical because it is going against the interests of the professional organization.
What is the explanation of the standard view on whistleblowing presented by Sissela Bok and reported by Robert Larmer in his article?
Jackson and Raftos (1997) referred to whistle blowing as an avenue of last resort. Employees find themselves in these situations when the authorities at their organisations have failed to take actions on reported issues affecting that organisation. Wimot (2000) likened whistleblowing to a spectrum. At one end of this spectrum whistleblowing would only cause minimal pain and scars on the stakeholders and organisation while on the other end is the worst scenario where the whistleblowing effects are turbulent and often experienced to be negative to all those involved (ibid).
Although many see it as a solution to keeping government surveillance in check, whistleblowing only alerts citizens to the problem. Chuck McCutcheon agrees with this claim in his article titled “Whistleblowers.” In the article, McCutcheon maintains that “there is a trend toward greater public support for whistleblowing and a stronger sense that whistleblowers should be supported, rather than it just being assumed that they are always destined to suffer as martyrs” (2). In other words, McCutcheon believes that whistleblowers only have the potential to start
Comparison between the Day of the Dead and Halloween: different ways of paying homage to death. Humanity has always had great fascination with death and this is contrastable in the amount of rituals dedicated to life in the hereafter. Throughout the world, the cult of death is present in different ways, either as a way of reuniting with loved ones, tribute to the gods or mockery. Of all the festivities related to death, Halloween and Day of the Dead are undoubtedly the most striking and popularized. Next we will see a brief comparison between these two parties in order to understand their main differences and divergent meanings.
The first amendment is one of the most used amendments today. Everyone in the world uses it and sometimes takes advantage of it and most times uses it when needed to. The Bill Of Rights was created on December 15th of 1779 and was created to make some rules in the future because no one had the freedom to do anything. Most were punished if they spoke their opinion, they did not even have the right to choose their own religion. But that all changed when James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights which is our first ten amendments. The First Amendment is and always will be the most used amendment today.
A Whistleblower is defined as an employee who submits a law infraction by their company, to the employer or to the Federal government and where the infraction could be sexual harassment toward the reporting employee or a public policy violation such as unlawfully keeping an employee from preforming their civic duty as on a jury ("Whistleblower Protections - FindLaw," n.d.). The U.S. government as well as numerous states have enacted statues to protect whistleblowers from an employer’s retribution for claim or violation report submissions
Companies in today’s society are often required to abide by an abundant amount of rules and regulations imposed upon them which stem from government and law enforcement authority. In analyzing the Case of “The Reluctant Security Guard” we will examine the decision making process which led to David Tuff effectively ‘whistle blowing’ for what he felt was the right thing to do.
The illuminated moon opened up the night. It was shining bright down on the unconscious General. That night Rainsford had thrown him out the window, attempting to kill him, but with Zaroff’s success, did not. At first glance, a person could conclude Zaroff was dead, but from a first-person view, any man can see he was slowly with a light heart moving.
2. What measures can and should be taken to make it easier for corporate employees to ‘‘blow the whistle’’ on a fraudulent scheme they uncovered within the firm?
Whistleblowers perform in many careers and are found at all levels of an organization: scientists and secretaries, lawyers and paralegals, managers and staff, security personnel and computer specialists, etc. They are as varied in age, ethnic background, education, profession, sex, and income as the population at large.