preview

Best Argument For Whistleblowing In The Workplace

Decent Essays
Open Document

Bryan Sherwood OIT ID: 918214744 PHIL 342 8/14/2015 Whistleblowing is the act that employees commit when they cry foul on their own organization for misdoings, corruption and illegality. I shall argue that whistleblowing in the workplace is “sometimes permissible” in order to keep businesses and corporations in check. I shall do so by presenting the best argument for whistleblowing to be “sometimes permissible” and not “always permissible”. The argument for whistleblowing will focus on the issue of whether or not whistleblowing is “permissible always” or “permissible sometimes”. Individuals who agree with the permissible always will claim that corporations are not the kinds of things that we can owe loyalty to. Proponents for being “permissible …show more content…

We would state that the purpose of a business group is solely to generate profits and nothing more. Businesses are different than groups since they are not dependent upon the individual but rather on the focus of increase profits. Families, groups of friends are places that have to “take you in no matter what”. They exist for the mutual benefit and support of their members, but businesses do not operate this way. Businesses benefit you and support you because doing so is profitable. When individuals conduct premium work and benefit the business, it is only to further the business. The business is not meant to benefit the members, except for an available …show more content…

This viewpoint has three elements and abides by: reductive view, super emergent view, and minimally emergent view. The reductive view states that individuals in a class may be to each student, and nothing more. If we are loyal to the class, or classmates, then we state that we are loyal to most or all members taking this class. While the argument “permissible always” was able to provide an explanation why we are to not feel loyal to corporations, it doesn’t mean that their argument is true. I shall now examine what I see as the best powerful against “permissible always”. While the argument appears above, there are more factors to be considered than just blowing the whistle. We need to weigh the gravity of the situation. If the matter being considered is of utmost danger to the company and could be In order for accusations to be received well, they have to be genuine. Cases must consist of genuine, immediate and specific threats on which the whistle can be blown on. However, if my claim as an employee of Toyota is discreet about their cars being built with poor parts like the Ford Pinto, my claim is not valid as it doesn’t hold specific action’s on what they are doing. Although it might be immediate and genuine, it would lack specificity. REWRITE

Get Access