Better School Lunches Research Paper

Since 2009 Schools have been improving there healthy choices of food like fresh fruits and salad bars,but those foods take longer to eat (Hellmich). Turning school lunches into an actual sit down meal rather than a feeding frenzy is a good way of improving health (Parker-Pope). Students usually have less than 20 minutes to eat lunch which makes it less likely for them to choose the healthy choice (Elsevier). Kids often like to eat there favorite foods first,not giving them enough time to eat the healthy food (Hellmich). An increase in school lunches could encourage students to eat the healthier choice(5 Elsevier). School nutritionist suggest that students need to have atlas 20 minutes to eat (Hellmich). Research shows that when people consume meals faster they take in more calories because they get hungry sooner (Chen). The shorter lunch periods are starting to lead to more and more obese and overweight kids ( Hellmich). Doctors are saying there are more and more kids getting diabetes and other illnesses due to the lunches and something needs to be done about it

School lunches are not the epitome of meals in the world. Raising the level of nutritional output would highly increase the healthiness of the student’s body. For example, if a child were to drink only water at school the health benefits would help that student, just by cutting out the sugar and the calorie intake. If schools were to serve grilled chicken instead of fried chicken, the student would not have that extreme carb intake just from the fried part alone. Chicken and vegetables should be the entrée for most school lunches, of course, this does not allow for a great variety of meals, but the healthiness of the students would increase over time and could possibly be the healthiest thing they eat that day, but the only thing that they eat at all. The poverty in Mississippi is abundant, which may mean that children do not get three square meals a day, but maybe only one, which is at school. Therefore, the best way to affect student’s healthiness is by putting good, nutritious, and energizing food on the plate in front of

ways that school lunches can be improved, but the most effective ideas are by improving the

A healthier lunch change is happening across schools statewide. Schools have finally realized that students are not eating as healthy as they should be. Schools will began to have healthier students, better food choices, and be able to cut out unnecessary junk foods. If schools change to healthier lunches, students will begin to become healthier themselves. Students will receive better nutritional value from the change in their lunches. Although students will vote against the change in food, they slowly realize the school is doing this help them achieve better health. Also, students will receive better energy and bodily functions from new and improved lunches. Students will gain increased vitamins and minerals from the which they were not currently receiving Healthier lunches will bring better food choices to students. It will replace normal, unhealthy foods with more nutritious, healthier

Now that I have uncovered the reason of why school lunches is bad for children, you should join my belief. Obesity is not good for children, that causes bullying. Stomach viruses causes you to get sick and miss days of school. Thats how some people get held back because they miss days of school and don’t want to make up the work which causes them to fail classes. Children not getting enough to eat at school makes them lose energy. When they lose energy they begin to slack, then begin to fail. Something always leads to good or

Starting at the beginning, the National School Lunch Program was created in 1946 to ensure that each and every American child could receive needed nutrients from their school lunches (Stallings). At the time, we as a nation had just come out of World War II and resources at home were low. The National School Lunch Program provided kids at least one nutritious meal per day. This help from the federal government meant that parents would no longer have the burden of preparing a school lunch for their children each and every day. Then, in 1975, The School Breakfast Program (SBP) was added so that children

Buddha once said, “ To keep the body in good health is a duty...otherwise we shall not be able to keep our minds strong and clear.” A trend started across the United States several years ago towards improving the quality of food provided for students eating school lunch. “School lunch has evolved quite a bite over the last century”(Avey). In spite of this evolution, there are many reasons why the public school system should further improve their daily lunch program. These changes would still include the daily recommended balance of fruits, vegetables, proteins, and carbohydrates. The top three reasons to improve school lunches include: obesity rate, overall grades, and lifelong habits.

First of all, lunches need to have better food for less. Right now I spend about $3 on a normal lunch which is really small and extremely expensive. Usually I will buy more food to suffice my hunger and I will spend up to $5 more. That is around $8 a day on food! That is outrageous! Schools need to make food that will actually fill the students up and and make it taste better because it school lunches taste like an old

School lunches should be improved so students can get the necessary vitamins to finish the day, to stay on task, and to fuel their minds to finish things on time.

Although school lunches are good to some students, others are becoming obese because of them. Healthier school lunches need to be provided at schools, rather than junk food and salt. The first lady Michelle Obama wants more schools to be part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, which provides healthier school lunches. The plan is just a effort of trying to get student to eat healthier at school.

The improved nutritional standards of public school lunches benefit one’s individual health by providing them with the necessary nutrients to human

School lunches at your local elementary, middle, and high school may not be healthy and nutritious as it seems and the taste does not make it any better. We should want our children to strive in everything, not just academics. School lunch programs needs to focus on giving the children

When you look at school lunches, do you see amazingly tasty food, carefully cooked and treated with care and delicacy? No, instead you typically see frozen patties that looks and tastes like they were thrown into a microwave, with whole grain bread and disgusting. low-fat milk for a drink. For a long time, school lunches have not met students’ expectations, and there are very easy ways to make school lunches a lot more enjoyable while maintaining a low school budget. School lunches need to have some major improvement with how they prepare their food, and bring a satisfyingly nutritious and delicious meal to the lunch tables.

Over 100,000 schools have adopted the National School Lunch Program since its launch in 1946 by then president Harry Truman. It was orgininally designed to provide low cost, healthy lunches at a reduced cost and was relatively effective. Lately however, since first lady Michelle Obama fueled a massive overhaul of the program shortly after her husband took office stripping the meals of so-called "unhealthy content" and started to require the "School Lunch act to meet minimum nutritional standards..." This federal program has become too much about controlling what students eat vs. its content and it needs to be changed.

Better nutrition in schools is critical being students will eat food that is better for them. Research shows students that eat school meals are more likely to obtain a healthier weight than students that bring a lunch if the school abide National School lunch program (NSLP). This shows that school lunch is healthier by