Between Nurture And Nature, The Truth Beneath The Rainbow Stream Essay

This is a comprehensive source of information on same sex marriage and gay rights. It contains unbiased, general explanations of the issue as well as scholarly opinions presenting the pros and cons. This source also refers to same sex marriage legislation in other parts of the world. For example, it describes the “homophobic climate of Uganda and other African countries,” and traces gay marriage customs back to the Netherlands, Scandinavia and Hungary. This source also compares the option of civil unions to the legalization of same sex marriage.

Gay marriage has been one of the most common topic under discussion, arguments and quarrels since couple of years in almost every nation of the world. Looking deep down to the region of United States, same-sex marriage or gay marriage has not been legalized and documented in most of its jurisdictions. However, it is prudent to note that with the beginning of the twenty first century, only a few of US states have legally recognized the gay marriage through court verdicts and legislative proceedings and have lawfully allowed the gay people to get into a relationship (Wolfson 2004).

Since the United States Supreme Court ruled marriages of gay individuals to be legal in all states in June 2015, some segments of society, including individuals, business and churches, continue to discriminate against gay citizens. Many of these discriminatory opinions and actions are based on individual religious beliefs. Many people feel homosexuality is a choice of lifestyle, whereas others feel that biological factors determine a person’s sexual orientation. Homosexuals want the same legal rights as heterosexuals. In addition, if it can be proven that individuals are born gay, then society’s attitude could be favorably altered. Poll data indicates that more and more people believe individuals are born gay (See Table 1). Gays would suffer less discrimination if their sexual orientation can be attributed to genetics and biology. Those who oppose homosexuality would feel their condemnation justified if it can be proven the gay lifestyle is a matter of choice. The sociopolitical implications resulting from further definitive research would be of enormous importance; however, years of research have failed to provide a definite origin of sexual orientation. Much more research is needed to close this knowledge gap.

Homosexuality is increasing in number in today’s society due to a number of situations that

From the philosophical points of Kantianism, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics on same-sex marriage, there are good reasons which are relevant to good will, duty, the principle of utility, and eudaimonia to support same-sex marriage. Although the Supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution places the right to same-sex marriage, people who stick to conservative position on same-sex relationships believe that a same-sex relationship violates moral and religious beliefs. Especially, religious objectors on same-sex marriage are a highly controversial topic because people who believe on religious grounds that define a marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman to pursue traditional family values. However, everything must change. The powerful social movements have accelerated the same-sex marriage issue in regard to the fundamental rights and the social justice. The social change involves inevitable consequences of the issue; so, the Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage has a validation. Therefore, Homosexual people should be entitled to federal marriage rights and

Biological factors expressed in this paper are the gay gene, studies about twins and adoption, chromosomal aberration, enzyme deficiencies and such. These factors, although deterministic in nature, did not necessarily determine homosexuality, but rather, influence it greatly. In addition to which, other factors such as psychological and sociological, parental and family dynamics are also influenced homosexuality in individuals. In the series of discussing, explaining the factors that causes homosexuality in individuals, there has been no definite answer to which to attribute the trait, or to even conclude which influence affects it most greatly. In conclusion, it is only applicable to recommend the scientists to garner and evaluate more studies,

Marriage: a legally recognized relationship, set up by common or religious function, between two individuals who expect to live respectively as sexual and residential accomplices. Regularly this is between a man and a woman, in incredibly, before their families, to vow to spend whatever remains of their lives together. As times keep on evolving far and wide so has the thought and laws concerning marriage. Marriage is no more pretty much a man and a woman committing themselves to each other forever, it now envelops, gay and lesbians also, as they promise to love, respect, and trust each other all the times of their lives. Same-sex marriage, likewise ordinarily alluded to as Gay marriage, is a fervently issue that partitions an awesome number of individuals all through the world. In this pugnacious exposition, the subject is investigated by three of its fundamental contentions. The principal investigation of this point will include the capacity of same-sex couples to parent as adequately as their heterosexual partners. Next, the legitimate issues encompassing same-sex marriage are investigated. Ultimately, the religious contentions are assessed. Both sides of the contention for and against same-sex marriage are talked about while the per user is given an admiration for the position of supporting marriage equality.

Nowadays, the point of view toward sexual minority was changed in some country as compared to totally restricted on homosexual behavior in past century. For example, some states such as Vermont,

Esteemed philosopher and writer G.K. Chesterton once wrote, “virtue is not the absence of vices or the avoidance of moral dangers; virtue is a vivid and separate thing, like pain or a particular smell.”

Within this essay, the main focus will be to develop a thorough analysis and discussion in relation to the topic of gay marriage. In order to construct this, the angle of this essay will display the ‘for and against’ positions in relation to gay marriage in our society. In reference to the main positions of ‘for’ legalising gay marriage, discussion will focus on; discrimination and equality and respect on individual’s rights. The points that will be discussed in reference to ‘against’ gay marriage will be building upon ideas that we rose in the debate as well as incorporating some new material. Throughout this essay, the ‘for and against’ positions will distinguish between both sides of the argument. Inclusion of scholarly articles will

The realization of the homosexuality in the modern western world as a cultural, sexual and a social category has been a result of complex power relations that surround sexuality and gender. The acceptance of homosexuality in the society has met its fair share of resistance and skepticism. The view that homosexuality can be in the same league as heterosexual has led it to be viewed as a normal behavioral and moral standard (Gallagher & Baker, 2006). Inasmuch as the skeptics may not want to accept the existence of homosexuality studies show that the habit is rampant today with many gay people coming out in the open. Of interest is the political acceptance of homosexuality with passing gay rights so that it can be recognized by law. This move has given homosexuals the ability to engage in legal entities like marriage (Gallagher & Baker, 2006).

“Homosexuality hasn’t been discovered recently. It has been common in our world since ancient times and still exists today.” (K.J .Dover,n.d.). It’s in the nature of an individual to be a homosexual, something that cannot be changed no matter how much you persuade or force them. People have different attitudes towards homosexuality; some are tolerant about it while others can’t stand the mere fact to see them around. This essay is going to define and briefly discuss homosexuality and how our society reacts to it.

In USA, the number of same sex couples increased by 30% in the United States from 2000 to 20005. (Gates, 2006, P.2) And similar situation happened all over the world. Because of the increasing number of homosexuals, legalizing homogeneous marriage becomes a hot topic. There are five countries and one state now performing homogeneous marriage. And many countries are debating this issue. Traditionally, marriage is a union of a man and a woman. And the new concept of marriage, homogeneous marriage, is marriage between two women or two men. What are they pros and cons of legalizing homogeneous marriage? In this essay, we will discuss the points in negative side and affirmative side.

On April 1, 2001, Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize same sex marriages. This trend has gained a lot of momentum with lot of nations in Europe and USA joining the trend (Riggle 231). This issue of same sex marriage has attracted both love and condemnation though those who are opposed to it much far outweigh the proponents. What is exciting is the fact that both sides of the divide have their own reasons most of which are valid. Africa and most of the Muslim nations are the only places which are still reluctant to embrace same sex marriages and their reasons are based on cultural and religious grounds. The proponents of this practice base their arguments on equality and freedom of choice. On the other hand, the opponents of same sex marriages anchor their arguments on points such as all rights have limits and it undermines religion.

Two single women living together could offer numerous interpretations. It is mostly uncommon and considered to be an issue for some people especially during the 19th century. The assumption then was that relationships were platonic but in recent years, different speculations started to came out (Lyness, Lipetz, and Davis 305). Different stories of intimate companionships prevailed and were contemplated to be unnatural as to the appeal of marriage between two women. Opposite presumptions however, argued that homosexual relationships should be acknowledged as legitimate because it is part of human rights to recognize and establish commitments, it stretches civil rights that concerns freedom and most especially, it is a step to gender equality.