Bhm320: Management of Health Programs/Moduel 4 Case Assignment

4. Based on your analysis in (1) – (3) above, what is your overall conclusion regarding the

Measuring the extent to which a program is achieving its goals and objectives and determining whether the entity is using its resources in the most effective and economical manner

This essay discusses the philosophies, concepts, and methodologies of research investigations. Research designs are contrasted and compared to assess benefits, limitations, and applications. Approaches to quantitative and qualitative studies are illustrated and explained. The operations and purposes of program evaluations and action research studies are elucidated.

The program evaluation will use a mixed method-approach drawing data from both quantitative and qualitative data sources. The data will be gathered and determined that it is valid, accurate and reliable. Upon summarization of the data a list of recommendations will be developed based on the results obtained. These recommendations will be valid and justifiable in order to alter or continue the program. These recommendation will be efficient, practical and capable of being implemented.

Current program evaluation emergence started in earnest in the early to mid-1960s when the need for systematical assessment of mostly educational programs began to multiply exponentially. The general purpose for program evaluation was, and has always been; with changes along the way; was to provide up-to-date information for all proponents of the decision making apparatus, provide consistency, and accountability. Program evaluation also makes possible for stakeholders responsible for deciding on improvement and continuation of existing programs or the proposal of new educational programs to perform their duties based on policies. Usually, program evaluators responsibility were divided into three sections. First, its the (needs assessment);

It is important for program managers and decision makers to know if their program is accomplishing its founding purpose. To provide that insight and aid in decisions about a current or proposed course of action, a program evaluation can be a very critical tool to determine how well a program is working and what impact it is having on the problem it is attempting to address. With that said, how are intended users and beneficiaries of an evaluation supposed to know if the evaluation they have been given is a good product, with enough substance to guide them in making critical decisions that will affect the livelihood of program workers, the wellbeing of program participants, and influence the use of the limited resources available to address

b) Preparation. Few programs cover an evaluation phase as part of the initial planning process and more programs lack measurable goals and moto.

2. Was the investigation of the problem the most appropriate way to do this? Is there some other things that they should have done? If so, how would you do it differently?

b) Do you feel that this was the most appropriate way to collect the data? Why or why not? What alternative data collection methods could have been used? (100-150 words) (1 pt)

4. What is the most significant finding in the article? Summarize this clearly in several sentences.

e) conducting program evaluations is an integral part of the operation and management of a program because it helps determine whether you meet the needs of your customers and achieve the overall objectives of your

A program evaluation examines a program to determine its worth, make recommendations for refinement and success (Spaulding, 2014). Plans come in many different sizes and shapes, so evaluations need

This paper is a review of Chapters 10, 11 and 12 in McDavid, Huse, and Hawthorn (2012) second edition, Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: An Introduction to Practice. Chapter 10 reviews performance measurements systems and how they are used, their effect and accountability. Evaluators and program managers and their connection is reviewed in Chapter 11. Additionally, how this connection is affected by the evaluation purpose and organizational contexts. Chapter 12 deals with the methodology of a good evaluation and points out that there has not been an agreed upon method of choice. This paper contains (1) an overview of the chapters, (2) summarize the key points, (3) summary of the reading, and (4) underscore some implications/applications for policy and practice at a local, state or national context.

Evaluation is the process that analyses the data and determines the extent to which the goal has attained (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2008). The type of data, the person responsible for data collection, period and method of collection are significant in data collection (Board of Directors, 2012). The analysis of data from the relevant sources indicates the degree of success. These indicators could be from different aspects like services, resources or from attributes such as satisfaction. The indicators will measure the success or failure of the strategy used and the effectiveness of the operation (Basili, n.d.).

When collecting data for evaluation purposes, the methods used should best fit the organization so as to provide that particular data necessary or required. Therefore, the data collection methods to be decided upon are those that are feasible when it comes to time and budget allocations of the organization. The best choice of the method to be utilized should be that which answers questions of evaluation and prioritization in both quantitative and