Bible Belt Academy Code Of Conduct

To a majority of society, law enforcement officers are viewed as the protectors of society. Due to the fact that officers provide a service to the community they could be placed in a position

A '''use of force continuum''' is a standard that affords law enforcement officials & security officers (police, probation, or corrections) with guidelines as to how much use of force may be used against a repelling subject in a given situation. In certain ways it is similar to the military’s escalation of force. The reason of these models is to clarify, both for officers and citizens, the complex subject of use of force by law officers. They are often vital parts of law enforcement agencies' use of force policies. Although various agencies have developed different models of the continuum, there is no universal standard model (Stetser, 2001, p. 36)

* Take responsibility to ensure the staffs are given appropriate information, instruction, training and supervision in order to comply with Health and Safety rules and procedures.

The use of force is inevitable in police work. In many situations the lives of officers or civilians can be taken by not using force when necessary or using it improperly. Many factors come into play when an officer decides to use force. This includes is the use of force justified, has the officer been properly trained to use force, and will the department be held liable if the force is used improperly?

The leading case on use of force is the 1989 Supreme Court decision in Graham v. Connor. In Graham, the plaintiff Graham, a diabetic, asked his friend to drive him to a convenience store to purchase orange juice to counteract the onset of an insulin reaction. Upon entering the store and seeing the number of people ahead of him, Graham hurried out and asked his friend, Berry, to drive him to another friend’s home instead. Defendant, Officer Connor became suspicious after seeing Graham hastily enter and leave the store, followed Berry’s car, and made an investigatory stop ordering the pair to wait while he found out what happened in the store. Berry tried to explain that his friend was having an insulin reaction, but Officer Connor was not convinced. When Connor returned to his patrol car to call for backup, Graham got out of the car, ran around it twice and sat down on the curb, where he passed out.

The use of less lethal weapons that are approved by TDCJ are by using restraints, protective equipment, chemical agents, and less than lethal ammunition. The restraints are defined as a measure or condition that keeps someone or something under control or within limits. Restraints in corrections system are used to escort offenders from place to place and controlling the offenders. The restraints that are approved by TDCJ are hand and leg restraint cuffs and a belt restraint. The officer puts on the hand and leg restraint cuffs which are a pair of lockable linked metal rings hooked together with a chain that is approximately four inches long for hands and twelve inches long for legs. Then belt restraint are used as a strong wrap around the offenders waist that has chains that connect the hand and leg restraint cuffs to the belt restraint. These restraints together keep the offender from having full mobility. Which according to most studies, it has helped prevent attacks on officers (Smith,R.2009). The use of protective equipment such as riot helmets, riot shields, riot batons, and stab vest. These protective equipment are mainly used when an offender or offenders are causing a violent public disturbance, or riot; it was to calm the violent offenders, yet protect the officers from being injured or killed. By having the riot helmets, shields, and batons helps

A. Preformed one-on-one employee interviews in order understand the reasons behind declining morale within the branch.

Like other law enforcement agencies throughout the United States, New Jersey has a policy that addresses police use of force. The New Jersey Attorney General’s Use of Force Policy was first put into operation in April 1985. The purpose of the policy is to serve as a guide for police officers who are confronted with use of force situations during their duty to preserve the law and protect others. This essay will provide a summary of the policies and practices of New Jersey’s Use of Force Policy. An evaluation of these components will be presented with emphasis on the legal sufficiency of the policies and procedures. Policy strengths and weaknesses will be identified in addition to suggestions for improvement. This essay will conclude

Whenever a law enforcement officer places an individual under arrest or is involved in a deadly force scenario the officer has used some degree of force. The incidents where an office has to make a split second decision and use physical force to control a situation is known as “Use of Force.” The use of force varies as situations present themselves to the officer and they must decide what level of force is necessary to control the situation. Often the use of force is subject to much debate and not a year goes by without some media coverage of some law enforcement officer accused of using excessive force. In dozens of studies of police use of force there is no single,

Purpose: This policy was created to educate police officers on the use and restrictions of force when placed in difficult situations. This policy will also explain how to distinguish lethal from non lethal tactics and weaponry. We want for them to exercise good judgment and caution when apprehending suspects; not only for their own safety, but the safety of others.

Three key attributes that chooses the legitimateness of physical force: illicitness, vitality, and common sense. Unlawfulness: Is the thing that the other individual executing illicit? On the off chance that it is definitely not unlawful physical force is not considerable. Vitality: Physical power must be earnestly basic to guard the individual or different people from the utilization of unlawful physical force. Common sense: The degree of physical force utilized as a part of self-conservation or the assurance of somebody else must be useful under the conditions that stand. It is worthy to utilize down to earth physical power. In any case, excessive or irrational physical force is illicit. There was a debate in August of 2014 in Ferguson, Missouri where a law implementation officer utilized savage drive and executed an 18 year old male after a commonplace store retailer 's call that gave a delineation of the previously stated male burglarizing the previously stated store. The case is no more under exhaustive examination however while it was being broke down the media broadened the case wild. Abundant measures of nationals were revolting and doing confused uprisings, inciting law authorization and other superb authorities to utilize lethal power to secure administration. Infrequently, savage power is required when subjects are wild.

A threat to cause death or serious bodily harm, by withdrawing of a weapon, does not constitute deadly force (General, 1985). The use of force is as old as law enforcement itself, dating back to when they first began. It was

The use of force, with regards to law enforcements use of it, is a complex topic that should be looked at in all perspectives. There is tension between the police and the community they work for, on whether this is a power that the officers should have or not. There are ambiguous laws that do not give law enforcement offices much guidelines on what is exactly permissible when it comes to force, and all the different situations it could occur. The line that the use of force leis on is often a fine one. It is teetering between excessive force and never being able to enforce the laws. The use of forces is a conversation that is worth having with all the pros and cons that it brings to the discussion board.

police departments have some kind of UOFC in place. Just having an officer present can resolve a situation. An officer should always conduct themselves professionally and in a non-threatening manner. If necessary they should use non-threatening and calm demands, being calm may help to calm the situation and the person or persons they are dealing with. The next step to gaining compliance would be hand control. This would be acquired by restraining the individual with the least amount of force necessary to obtaining the compliance needed of the individual. The next level would be less than lethal control by means of instruments such as a baton, projectiles, chemicals like pepper spray to restrain combative individuals. The last resort is lethal force. This should only be used if an individual is of a serious threat to the officer or another

Empty-hand control and restraints is the third level and it is using bodily force to gain control of a situation (National Institute of Justice). This would be where an officer may need tackle, grab or hold in order to restrain an individual that is getting too out of control or too aggressive. Punches and kicks may be needed to subdue an individual who is coming after you and that is the only way to restrain them. Less-lethal methods consisting of blunt impact, chemical agents, and conducted energy devices like a taser make up level four (National Institute of Justice). Officers use these in order to distract someone, get away to call for help, or subdue the criminal though an assailant may still be able to attack if you use some of these tactics (McGoey). If they do become more intense or start out of control then you may need to use deadly or lethal force in order to protect yourself or another from serious harm and this is level five (National Institute of Justice). A few deadly situations that this is justified in are an assailant coming at you with a knife or a gunman pointing a firearm at you (McGoey).