addition, the Bible is never fixed and is always open to interpretation. This means that inherency
37); the Bible is regarded as being inerrant, because it was created by God and God cannot lie and is incapable of lying. The authenticity of God’s word is stated several times throughout Scripture, and David proclaims that God’s word is error-free; to object the honesty of God’s word as being true is to challenge the claim of Christ (Cartwright & Hulshof, 2016, pp. 35-37).
However, in order for that argument to have meaning to a person, they would first have to believe in the truth behind the Bible. See this is where the argument of society creating our out looks on right and wrong comes from. In earlier ages it was less heard of to not trust the Bible as your source of right and wrong. Throwing out the Bible as the only source, now a days we have seen the change in what is considered “acceptable” in sexuality and morals. Society has said no to the Bible as
The Bible really does condemn homosexuality. Romans 1: 24-27 says, “And the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error (Holy Bible, NIV).” In this verse, it clearly states that the men who gave up loving women and started having relations with other men will receive the due penalty for their error. It was not in God’s design to have people of the same sex to have relations. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 says those who practice these kind of acts will not inherit the kingdom of God. These verses prove that the Bible condemns homosexuality.
The Bible is free from errors, because it was totally inspired from beginning to end by is Word. God cannot lie so his word is truth and free of mistakes or errors. Psalms remains one of the most noted examples of this. Those who do not know the love of God or have an opened heart to let him in their life will find ways to always doubt. But as believers we know that that kind of thinking is false and never accepting the Lord will not turn out very well for us at the end of our lives here on earth.
This topic has been studied on for a long period of time already. Thus, resulting to a lot of articles on the internet or in books that prove that the Bible really is reliable. Despite it being about thousands and thousands of years old, it is still consistent and very up to date.
There is much debate over the accuracy and the inerrancy of Scripture. Pertaining to this debate there exists an underlying question as to whether or not the New Testament is considered part of the canon or for that matter if it is actually given by the inspiration of God. How did the books that are in the New Testament get there? Who decided which books should be added or taken out? Do we have all the books that we should have? Many ask these questions, but Christians are ill equipped to give an answer. For centuries, Christians have claimed that they have the absolute truth, are saved only by faith, and claim the Scriptures as inspired by God. In spite of these
The Bible is the best-selling book of all time, and with good reason. For the stories written in it have changed the way many think and even believe when it comes to the power greater than this world. The Bible holds very specific opinions on things such as slavery, who humans should treat each other, and ultimately social justice. It has been one of the most important foundations for allowing social reform to occur in modern day history as well as the history of the whole world. However, it is forgotten in history class how prominent the ancient texts have changed the people. When looking at the history, it is discovered to be the strength of great people who have used its wisdom to bring about a change for those who could not do it on
Many scholars claim the New Testament is not reliable for many reasons. Some claim that the Bible is not reliably transmitted because it's like the telephone game. Others say that the Bible has been copied so many times there is no way it's accurate. When examining documents like the Bible, we can find out it's reliability by asking some fundamental questions. Was the document written close to the events it describes? Is the document able to be corroborated by multiple external sources? Has the document been reliably transmitted or copied? If we answer yes to these questions, we determine the document is reliable.
This is true throughout the whole entire Bible stating that there is no inerrant part. In the Matthew 4:4, it says that “but he answered and said, it is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeded out of the mouth of God”. This verse allows us to see that God truly inspired every word written in the Bible. From a Christian stand point if God symbolically wrote the bible then the bible is without errors, or in other words the bible has inerrancy. There are four arguments that fight for the inerrancy of the bible using biblical support and faith based arguments. The first arguments state the bible teaches its own inerrancy, meaning that that are no errors since it comes from God. Second, the bible has divine messages that were inspired by God, written and interpreted by prophets. Third, the bible teaches it own authority, and to be able to do such a thing the book much have inerrancy. Fourth, the bible uses scripture to support its own inerrancy. I believe the strongest of these arguments are the first and third one, because each of them show that God is the source of all truth. The second argument is the weakness since its based on human’s ability to interpret God’s
The Bible says that it was inspired by God itself in 2 Timothy 3:16, “All Scripture is God- breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.”(NIV) There are a few Christians who believe that scripture was written verbatim from the mouth of God on to paper by men. I have trouble believing this because of a few different reasons. One is that the way some of the authors wrote the scriptures were to vary differently than the others. If the scriptures were all completely God’s words verbatim than they would all be written in the same manner and the personalities and intelligence of the writers would not be shown in the text. Also that some of the Bible are just people speaking of their problems or issues or just records of historical events instead of God Speaking these words directly. I am not saying the authors were not inspired to write these things but that they were not the exact words of
Phillips, Brown and Stonestreet (2008) noted that “the primary means by which God has revealed Himself is the scriptures” (p. 94). Therefore, discussing the textual reliability of the word of God was acute. One way that I explained this was through the concept of M.A.P.S., which stands for manuscripts, archeology, prophecy and statistics. When it concerns just prophecy, there are 2500 in the Bible, 2000 of which have already come to pass (West-Stellick, 2011, p. 36). Furthermore, the Dead Sea Scrolls, which were discovered in 1947, further proved the validity of the Bible as well as the Tel Dan Stela which affirms King David’s existence. In an empirically-oriented world, this data is significant. Even more, when you consider the statistical probabilities of only eleven prophecies in the Bible coming to pass, the numbers are prodigious. For example, if one probability was embodied in the form of a silver dollar, we could put them all together and as Stoner (2005) explained, “make 1028 solid silver balls the size of the sun” (para. 119). Indeed, Jesus was clear about the definitude of the scriptures. Phillips, Brown and Stonestreet (2008) noted that “inerrancy was stated both explicitly and implicitly by Him” (p.
"You can 't trust the Bible. I 's full of all kinds of contradictions and errors". This is a very common charge made against the Bible today. You may have heard this kind of thing from a friend or coworker. Maybe you have even heard this kind of things stated on TV, but is it true? Is the Bible an unreliable book full of errors and contradictions? To answer this question let us look at some of the more commonly cited proofs for this assertion.
The Bible is not a book of religions or rituals. Rather, the Bible is a library of 66 books—39 of which are known as the Old Testament and 27 books referred to as the New Testament—that reveals God’s divine plan of redemption, reconciliation, salvation, restoration and renewal of the whole world. The Bible can be read as a great literature, or as a history of Israel, or as a source of theological information. Though it is all of these things, none of them does full justice to Scripture as being authoritative. God has all authority, and we accept the Bible as the primary authority by which God communicates to us what He wants us to believe and to do. N.T. Wright’s book theorizes that Scripture is authoritative in that “the authority of
The bible was written as an account of what many viewed that God had accomplished so his actions and words could be passed on for generations. Some believe it is a literary account and some believe it is a historical account. The word of God in the bible comes in many forms and is left up to interpretation by the reader. Some believe that the word of God should be the only word and should be strictly followed. Some believe that the words are meant as a guideline to help us through life. Whatever your belief is you can always seem to find the meaning behind your belief through the word of God in the Bible.