Biblical Authority Brueggemann Analysis

Ferrin’s process of inductive Bible study takes on a relational approach that consists of three essential parts or phases titled Foundation, Framing, and Finish Work. The structured methods encompass studying a book of the Bible and internalizing it rather than just memorizing the words (p. 3). The author diligently explains how that through the devoted application of all phases individuals and group Bible study participants are sure to “fall in love with God’s Word” (p. 3). Ferrin presents and or describes Scripture internalization as taking in the truth and then applying it to everyday life or living. Ferrin pointed out that the benefits of understanding biblical messages book by book include the Living Word of God becoming a reality within persons that grow more enjoyable and rewarding as time comes and goes.

people as they grow up reading the Bible, interprets the Bible from various viewpoints. These

This book review is from the readings of Biblical Inspiration by Howard Marshall. The book is published by Regent College Publishing located in Vancouver, and British Columbia published the book in 2004. The book is braces around the interpretation of the Bible, and the inspiration of the Bible in our lives of today. There are many questions that are brought up the book, and these include: Is the Bible infallible? How do we interpret the Bible today? is its inspiration believable in and biblical criticism believable? All of the different opinions on biblical issues equivalent to these bring up issues and questioning within the community. It is Marshall’s goal to try and produce a statement that is concrete of what the Bible says in our lives today.

When studying the Bible, it is important to understand its origins; for me, I I have become enlightened, but troubled after learning about the subject. I found the unit, as a whole, very important and a positive experience for me. But, with this comes much apprehension and confusion as to the strength of the Bible.

Most Christians would assert that the Bible has importance for their faith and understanding in how to live out their beliefs. However, there is great diversity in how exactly this takes shape. At issue is one’s perspective on how to read the Bible and the authority that is granted to Scripture. Differing viewpoints can be placed along a continuum ranging from conservative to liberal perspectives on the role of Scripture. Sparks (n.d.) highlights the hallmarks of different traditions based on a number of factors such as how the Bible is read, views of inerrancy, and the authority of tradition. Both Protestant Fundamentalists and Conservative Evangelicals hold to biblical inerrancy as a hallmark of their faith. However, the two diverge regarding

In Core Christianity, Elmer Towns states, “Books of other religious were written by their founders in their attempt to find God” (Towns, 2007). Therefore, religious texts written and inspired by human thought only provide conclusions. “But the Bible is not a search for God; the Bible is God’s book to reveal Himself to the human race” (Towns, 2007). The dual authorship of the Scripture provides words with “convicting, convincing, converting power to all who honestly accept its message and believe in Jesus Christ” (Towns, 2007). Therefore, the credibility and reliability of the Word of God can only be known by applying it to one’s life and watching how its words and teachings

My own understanding of the bible comesfrom experiences that I have had in my life such as attending church services and bible studies growing up as well as religiousfunction which serve the purpose of increasing my understanding of the bible ad h which contributed too much of my current knowledge and understanding of the bible. I ampersonally very focused and locked into the "/ienefits of the scripture of the bible and the insight itprovides us to the past present and future of our history here on earth.

The major creeds that influenced the writing of this section are the Second London Confession of 1689 and the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy. Both of these documents are short yet comprehensive statements on the Bible and how it affects Christians. One of the main biblical texts is 2 Timothy 3:15-17, where Paul espouses the grandeur of the Scriptures. The Bible is inerrant and dependable, quite literally “breathed out by God” and must be utilized for teaching correct doctrine and rebuking false teaching. Romans 3:2 is another verse that is foundational, and in it Paul states that God spoke to the prophets, who in turn communicated this truth to their people. The Bible is God’s promises and commands to live and thrive in the world.

The Bible has challenged many people as a piece of literature containing history, poetry, and written letters. Some would argue that the contents of Scripture are inaccurate, however would still agree that it carries significant value as a piece of literature. Conversely, those who ascribe to the teachings of the Bible are dealt with questions about the authority and inerrancy of Scripture. It is becoming increasingly important that Christians understand and embrace the full inerrancy of Scripture. The theological implications dictate the contemporary church’s view of God himself. Also, there is rising arguments versus the inerrancy of Scripture found in postmodernism. Beyond an all-out attack on the inerrancy of the Bible by liberalism, even some Christians argue the notion that it is irrelevant for theological conversations within the contemporary church. Historically speaking, churches that have abandoned the inerrancy of Scripture, have also gone on to abandon theological foundations of faith, which has eternal consequences. The office of Biblical inerrancy must be defended in order for a strong foundation of Biblical theology.

The Bible is infallible: totally complete without errors or mistakes. Psalm 19:7 says “The Law of the Lord is perfect.” Our God can not sin and is without error, so his word to us is complete without error. Proverbs 30:5 also says, “Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him.” There have been approximately two thousand prophecies foretold in the Bible and every single one of them have come completely true, down to the last jot and tittle.

According to Angus-Green, a Parable “…denotes a narrative constructed for conveying important truth.”1 These narratives can be thought of like a picture painted out of words. As in any painting, the artist is trying to draw your attention to a moment in time which he or she feels is important to what they’re trying to communicate. The artist will use different colors and imagery to focus the observer to the central point of the painting. Much like this, a parable uses different words and even figures of speech to draw the reader into the central point of the parable. Once understood, the parable imparts one central truth that may take many sentences or even paragraphs to convey. The problem with interpreting these truths often lies in sifting through the parts of a parable that are meant for dramatization of the theme and parts that are essential to the crux of the matter. English theologian Thomas Hartwell Horne developed a system of 9 rules to guide one in the interpretation of parables. The purpose of this paper is to familiarize ourselves to Horne’s nine rules to better understand the proper method of interpreting parables in Biblical text.

Recently I have been overwhelmed by the various conflicting views on the interpretation the bible. Many people say that to be a Christian you must follow and believe the bible verbatim. However, I realize that it is nearly impossible to do that because of the context in which it was written. Marcus Borg’s has successfully provided a logical way to read the bible, with still being able to respect and incorporate older Christian traditions, but also focusing and taking into consideration the modernized world and reality in which we read the bible today. Hence the essential subtitle, Taking The Bible Seriously But not Literally. I salute Borg’s for taking on the challenge of addressing a burning issue that separates two distinct group of

Many people believe the idea that truth is subjective, especially when it comes to the Bible. Some think that whatever they believe to be true, is true, while another person believes what they know is true for them. With these basic facts it is clear that most people has their own truth, even if it flatly contradicts other people's truths. In effect, this means that people cannot understand the Bible alike; causing their interpretations to be misinterpreted for their own viewpoints.

The third school of interpretation is Traditionalism. Traditionalists maintain that the Bible is full of truth, God is revealed within the Bible and that it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. One of the key characteristics of their approach to the Bible is its emphasis on the need to understand the nature of the different types of literature within the bible. However, traditionalists would not accept the fundamentalist’s notion of inerrancy as many would acknowledge that there are mistakes in the Bible. These are seen as a reflection of both the historical context in which they are written and the human fallibility of the authors. As with Liberals, traditionalists believe that some aspects of the Bible need to be reinterpreted for today. Traditionalists place a lot of emphasis on the process of exegesis. However, after establishing the intended meaning of the author the next step in the traditional approach is the question of how it should be applied to Christian today. However, whereas fundamentalists believe that the true meaning of a text should be clear to each reader;

To discover what the parables say about the Kingdom of God, they must first be interpreted. Jesus himself can be found saying that parables contain “mysteries” on the inside. Sometimes, however, finding the deeper meaning for a parable can be tricky. To make the task of interpreting parables easier, it helps to find out Jesus’ audience. Jesus did not intend for us to be unable to understand his parables. Rather, he fully intended for them to shed light on the Kingdom of God, sometimes we just need to dig a little deeper with an open heart and open eyes.