Many individuals have their own unique biblical viewpoint and perspective. Some people believe that the teachings of the bible do not necessarily go together with many taboo topics. However, in my opinion, the Bible can be interpreted accordingly to individual’s needs regardless of religion or beliefs. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to briefly explain the biblical view of science, technology, and the business world. Moreover, a few examples will be given to back up my personal conclusion.
To begin, it is important to address the fact that the Biblical tradition in ethics has been around for many years, and it is most familiar. However, biblical tradition is not completely acceptable by philosophers due to the religion being a sensitive topic, and because of the many ethical justifications.
The biblical view of science is that science helps reveal the natural truth of the Bible. Furthermore, science has the ability to back up its discoveries with the scientific method while the bible is a source written by men many years
…show more content…
However, in our book, the Ten Commandments in Exodus are mentioned. Every commandment has a very important significance, and this too can be applied in the biblical view of business to rule the people. Nonetheless, people do not have to be religious to live by these principals of ethics.
To summarize, the biblical view of science, technology, and the business world can be seen with a different perspective from my own as this is mostly based accordingly to religion, personal beliefs, and individuality. I could express my personal viewpoint with the many Bible verses in order to back up my conclusions, but I soon realized that if readers do not agree with my point of view, all of my hard work would have been pointless. However, in my opinion, it is highly regarded to maintain an ethical position in everything that we
The physical aspects of life must line up with the spiritual aspects in a business with a Biblical Worldview. Any business that lasts is organized to line up philosophically, values wise and has the principles that demonstrate the nature of God (Chester, n.d.).
Historical examples are given of times when the sciences and faith have interacted such examples include the Roman Catholic Church and Darwinism (Entwisle, 2010). The purpose of these examples was to show that back then the church either would either change scripture to accommodate the science or completely reject it. The author
The Old Testament of the Holy Bible gives many examples which provide modern man with guidelines for the use of scientific method. Millam (2008) explains that there is an underlying order in nature demonstrated by the patterns and regularities of God’s creations. These regularities can be seen in the forces of nature and are stable throughout space and time (Millam, 2008). The original classification of species, use of precise measurement, and even the first account of scientific research, are all included in the Old Testament of the Holy Scriptures. God gives scientists some clear frames of reference for seeking knowledge and truth in science.
According to Galileo, nature is “immutable”, unchanging over time, and she “cares not a whit whether her abstruse reasons and methods are understandable to men”. Alternatively, the Bible, in order to “accommodate the understanding of everyman” is subject to interpretation “so as the bare meaning of the words is concerned”. Puzzling as both can be, new discoveries in nature may refute the theories of the Bible. It is dangerous to apply Bible scriptures to science because that would then limit the meanings of the scriptures. The Bible is based on limited and often theoretical conjecture and using passages taken from it to which are, perhaps not understood properly, are inappropriate and “ill-suited to their purposes”, as it is possible for the “Bible [to]…speak untruth”. Irrefutable evidence of the Sun and Earth’s movements was not available when the Bible was originally composed. Galileo thought it was self-serving of those in the church to condemn his findings, by “showing a great fondness for their own
This concludes that even though the ideas of the Bible is true in many ways, they cannot compete with the flawless scientific reasonings of an
Business for the glory of God, written by author Wayne Grudem, discusses the relevance of business according to Biblical principles. Identifying specific verses in Scripture, Grudem details how every aspect of business exists as a means for humanity to glorify God by imitating His sovereignty over universe. In addition, he dispels the myth that business, “in itself”, exists as morally neutral (Grudem, 2003, pg. 24). Evidence supporting Grudem’s opinion of the long-held belief that neutrality repudiates the morality of business, exists with Calvinist Philosopher, R.J. Rushdoony. In his book, The institutes of Biblical Law, he states that “neutrality is the basic supposition of humanism not Christianity…everything is God revealed, universal or neutral principles of law, language, or culture do not exist” (Rushdoony, 1986).
The purpose of this essay is answer the following questions in scope of Genesis chapters one through eleven. How does having a biblical world view affect the way we look at the natural world compared to others who don’t? How does the biblical world view affect our human identity compared to those who do not? How does having a biblical world view affect human relationship? How Does the biblical world view affects civilization?
The Bible is relevant to science but we should watch out on how to interpret that science to what we know to
After several weeks of analyzing moral theory, the divine command theory prevails. Jehovah created us (page 7, Column 1) intrinsically valuable, in that we are each a temple, in and of ourselves. (Page 71 Column 1) Proven scientific knowledge includes the fact that in the 1769 King James Version (Isaiah 40:22), undisputedly references the circle of the earth. This is tantamount to believing in a higher being, which is in perfect accordance with the divine command theory, in that, the date of the aforementioned discovery by humankind was in the 15th century; only One Being could have shared this infinitesimal knowledge. The Bible is not a science book; it teaches through stories. However, whenever it makes an assertion relating to a
In general, when our society discusses religion and technology, we discuss them as opposites, as two things that are essential to our lives but are incompatible when considered together. In his book Religion of Technology, David Noble argues against this common idea. Noble argues that they are not only compatible in our modern day, but that they have been essential to each others growth for much of religious history. In the text, Noble outlines the history of the intertwining of religion and technology, focusing primarily on “useful arts” from the past and artificial intelligence, atomic weapons, biological engineering, and space exploration in our present day. While it may seem that these scientific advances has very little to do with religion,
This paper will delve into a greater understanding of the following questions. What is the meaning of Worldview? What is meant by each of the four primary aspects of the Biblical worldview: creation, the fall, redemption and restoration? How does free enterprise comport with or reject creation, the fall, redemption, and restoration? How does socialism comport with or reject creation, the fall, redemption, and restoration? How does progressivism support or reject Biblical Worldview?
Too much of the Christian worldview’s attention is focused on reconciling the Bible with science and archaeological discoveries when it should be focused on redemption. The theme of the Bible could be summarized into four categories Creation,
In chapter 8: Idealism and the Order of Creation, the main idea that is being brought to our attention is that many students and engineers believe that the fundamental purpose of a business is to make money. This was shown in a project that the author gave his students to apply fundamental principles of justice, stewardship, and service. These students found it hard to apply biblical principals to their businesses. However, this DLVK has brought to our attention that we must seek biblical principles when creating. The purpose of life or a business is not to make money. It is to follow in the path of Jesus Christ. God put us on this plant to service his creations. Therefore, the purpose of business or creating anything should be to be of service.
“Many people today insist that science can only be done by people who have a secular worldview. Such statements are blatantly absurd and are a type of arbitrary fallacy called an “ignorant conjecture”” says Bodie Hodge (Hodge). They also say that scientist have to leave their religious belief behind them when making scientific decisions. If science can only be secular and have no biblical worldview then why were several fields of science developed by bible believing Christians? For instance, Francis Bacon developed the scientific method and he was a young-earth creationist and Christian. Even in todays time, the inventor of the MRI scanning machine, Dr. Raymond Damadian, is a Christian working with Christian principles
Throughout the bible, and reading it once more by Marcus Borg, a common idea as it relates to a religious experience, is that the Bible is a human product. Throughout chapter two, Borg continuously describes the Bible as being a product of humans. He explains on page 22 that he sees scripture through the lens of the Bible being a human product, meaning that it is the “product of two ancient communities” (22). He believed that what the Bible explains things to be are words from the communities of ancient Israel and the early Christian movement. “We cannot talk about God (or anything else) except with the words, symbols, stories, concepts, and categories known to us, for they are the only language we have”, made me think about the idea that