Big Five Personality Domains

After taking the Big Five Personality Assessment, I was able to decode certain aspects of my personality and analyze whether different strengths and weaknesses. One strength I found was me openness to experience. Being open to others and their ideas has broadened my horizons. I have found that I have so much to learn from others. Whether their ideas are positive or negative, they provide feedback which overall has increased my communication skills. This is a recent strength for me. With prior companies, change was delivered as bad news, we were not taught to work with our peers but rather compete. With my new company I am experiencing the opposite side of the spectrum. I am encouraged to communicate with anyone needed, regardless of

Personality theories, or models, are metaphors for describing something which is intrinsically indescribable, the human personality. Currently, one of the most popular approaches among psychologists for studying personality theory is the Five-Factor Model (FFM) or Big Five dimensions of personality. This essay will explore the 'Big Five ' personality constructs and seek to explain how useful they are to understanding how people are likely to perform in a work situation. In conclusion, this essay will also discuss some of the arguments against the relevance and accuracy of personality testing within the employment context.

A survey was conducted at Texas A&M University in which the “Big Five” traits of Psychology were measured. The focus of the research is to use descriptive statistics to determine the average personality across the Texas A&M University student body and compare the results to the average personality across the University of Texas student body. Descriptive statistics describes the data that the researcher is analyzing in terms of the average and variability of the sample. Two types of descriptive statistics exist to describe the data: central tendency and variability. Central tendency describes the average of a sample by interpreting the mean, median, and mode. Variability describes the difference in the set of scores through the interpretation of standard deviation, variance, and range.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.

The Big Five Test is a compilation of 70 questioned geared towards “measuring how accurate or inaccurate the statements pertain to you.”(Wentz) This test is considered to be an objective test measuring certain traits of the individual taking it rather than states. Traits differ from states in the sense that traits are life-long characteristics; meanwhile states are temporary characteristics of an individual. This test was designed to measure the Big Five personality traits, including: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness. When you are listed as being in the higher percentiles for each of these categories, then you

The five personality dimensions are listed above. To get an accurate understanding of the five traits, different types of data test must be used. The four types of data tests are: S-Data (self report data), O-Data (observer report data), T-Data (test data), and L-Data (life outcome data).

After doing the personality test through The Big Five Project, I would like to reflect on my own personality. Also, I have opinion on the outcome.

The Big Five Personality Profile indicated that my top two dimensions were Openness and Agreeableness. These fit perfectly into the most challenging project of my career, building a new hospital. I was the technology leader for the Good Samaritan new hospital project.

The Analysis of the Five Factor Model In this essay, first the Five Factor Model (FFM) will be described. Secondly, psychologists for and against the model will be looked at. Following this, the stability of traits will be looked at, both longitudinal and cross situational. Finally, the application of the model within and outside psychology will be evaluated to show support that the FFM provides a solid foundation for an adequate personality psychology.

Scales of the WPS conclude to twenty personality scales that measure five distinct areas of personality, known has the Big Five Personality Factors

The authors of this revision were Yossef Ben-Porath and Auke Tellegen. They established this 338-item broadband inventory of the psychological constructs, which was derived from the 567-items in the MMPI-2. Consistent with previous versions, this test is used for individuals 18 years and older. The RF consists of 9 Validity Scales, 3 Higher Order Scales, 9 RC Scales, 23 Special Problem Scales, 2 Interest Scales, and the 5 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Scales, totaling to 51 scales. The PSY-5 Scales were created by Harkness and McNulty, which provides a link to the Five Factor Model of personality (2007). The broad spectrum of personality and psychopathology constructs assessed by the MMPI-2-RF are consistent with its ability to assess for a wide range of psychopathological

. More studies would need to be performed with the sub-facets since they are more of an importance. This would show how the Big Five domains actually do not capture the full spectrum of personality traits. Since the participants gave their information by self-reports, it would be good to show outcomes where they had been observed. Very few studies have assessed this information at the surface level. It would have been good to show how age can and should be respected in regards to the aging development. Not only do people develop their traits, but also everybody needs to develop their character. 1 Timothy 4:12 explains people are to examples with all that they do, such as “in speech, conduct, love, faith and in purity”. These characteristics would be associated with Intellectualism, which stays the same throughout adulthood.

Personality. Participants completed the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), which contains 2 items for each of the Big Five personality constructs of Extraversion (M ¼ 4.14, SD ¼ 1.60), Openness (M ¼ 5.20, SD¼1.10), Conscientiousness (M¼5.34, SD¼1.22), Neuroticism (M ¼ 3.27, SD ¼ 1.47), and Agreeableness (M ¼ 5.30, SD ¼ 1.10). Items were answered on a scale ranging from 1 (disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly). As reported in Gosling, Rentfrow, and Swann (2003), the scale is

One way to measure personalities, is by using the Big Five Inventory (BFI). The Big five inventory is a self-answered questionnaire that measures the five main personality traits. The Big Five was first introduced by Ernest Tupes and Raymond Christal in

The original International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) focused on Goldberg’s 100-adjective markers of the psycholexical FFM structure (Goldberg, 1990/1992). The current IPIP-50 is a 50-item prototype public domain (the NEO-PI-R is a commercial questionnaire) personality questionnaire (Goldberg et al., 2006; Goldberg, 2011). Since the questionnaire is free of charge over 600 different studies have employed it (Goldberg, 2016). Until 2005 the IPIP big-five factor markers lacked validating evidence, but research conducted in 2005 found that the IPIP-50 had a high internal consistency and related strongly to both Costa and McCrae’s NEO-FFI and Eysenck’s EPQ-R Short Form (Gow et al., 2005). In addition, Gow et al. (2005) found that although Intellect and Openness related less strong, it was still 0.59. A study carried out in New Zealand found that there was hardly any evidence to suggest hidden biases at the item or scale level of the IPIP-50 (Guenole & Chernyshenko, 2005). Before looking at the research examining the relation between the FFM and EI, this literature review first presents some of the current findings in EI.