Bigfoot Research Paper

Performing extensive research, I located and listened to any recording I could locate of a Bigfoot speaking. Mary Green’s book “50 Years with Bigfoot: Tennessee Chronicles of Co-Existence” was also used as a reference. Mary had compiled a dictionary of “Bigfoot” words, along with phrases based on a notebook kept by Janice Carter.

People go out and try to find evidence that Bigfoot real. According to Live Science in their article called Bigfoot Vandalizes a Winnebago and Other Questionable Claims they stated, “In October 2011. Bigfoot researcher and biologist John Bindernagel visited western Siberia to examine evidence of the Yeti (the Russian version of Bigfoot). He claimed to have found evidence that the creature broke trees and branches. ‘Twisted trees like this have also been observed in North America and they could fit with the theory that Bigfoot makes a nest.’ Bindernagel said in an interview with the British tabloid ‘The Sun’”. John Bindernagel is one of the many people that go out and study if Bigfoot is real or not and has gathered information about how the thing is damage and that no other animal can do that that live in the area so that he concluded that this could have been a creature that leads to Bigfoot. People have seen Bigfoot people who said they won’t believe it until they see it and now that they see if they can’t stop thinking about it and join in the

The tale of Bigfoot or Sasquatch traces its origins back to the Native American tribes of the Northwestern part of the United States and Canada. The natives told this tale of a group of giant hairy wild ape-man like people that protect the forests to give reason for respecting nature and preserve order. Bigfoot sightings have spread throughout the United States and the world. Our fascination with this creature have spiraled into almost mass hysteria among people to find and prove this creature is real. I decided to observe and analyze the film Bigfoot.

In October of 2010 an event happen that would rock the collective Bigfoot Research World. A bear hunter named Justin Smeja would shoot two Bigfoot. One adult, most likely a female, and one juvenile. Over time there have been various versions of the shooting story. Justin Smeja, in my opinion, was afraid of possible legal consequences. Therefore, he was vague, even misleading on the details of the location of the shooting. Through research of his many radio, video, and TV show appearances here are the basic facts of the event:

For over a 150 years man has been troubled by one great mystery, a mystery that has baffled all who have witnessed it and all who have tried to solve it. This mystery is commonly known as Bigfoot, a tall hairy man/ape who lurks in the woods in almost every country on this planet. Some say it is just an ape, some believe it is a man in costume, and others are true believers of this hairy phenomenon. For more than a decade and a half this creature of myth has caused enormous contradictions in the field of science, bringing about one question. Does Bigfoot exist?

The Blackfoot People are one of the many Native American Indian tribes that roamed America in the early 1700s. Like many tribes they were nomadic hunters that lived in the Great Plains of Montana and the Canadian provinces of Alberta. The name is said to have come from the colour of the peoples shoes that were made of leather. They had typically dyed or painted the soles of their shoes black.

A majority of the questions a Bigfoot quester might be asked is, what evidence shows us that this mythical creature actually exists today? According to the BFRO(Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization), the most recurring evidence that they have is the plentiful amount of witnesses. Witnesses are the people that say they have had an encounter with the mythical Bigfoot. The Patterson-Gimlin film, is said to be the strongest evidence of Bigfoot. Scientists have been evaluating the film for over 40 years, and they have not yet came up with an answer, on whether it's a hoax or if the film is actually showing us an actual Bigfoot. Many people have confessed to being the man in the suit, but scientists say it is

The quest began when Bigfoot was captured on film for the first time by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin. In the year of 1967, the two men were out in a remote mountainous location in Northern California. After Patterson heard about the tracks found near Bluff Creek, he was determined to make a documentary about the mysteries of the Sasquatch. Buoyant, he rented a 16mm movie camera and went to the area in question with his comrade, Bob Gimlin. He caught the beast on camera casually strolling through an open clearing, staring at Patterson filming while continuing to walk. The film became known as the Patterson-Gimlin film. According to Animal Planet, "The Patterson-Gimlin film is widely regarded as one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the existence of Sasquatches,” (“The Patterson-Gimlin footage”).

says the loch ness monster has been around for many years. most accounts of the Loch Ness have

Bigfoot has become an influence to American children for decades. Bigfoot (or “Sasquatch”) is a tall, dark haired cryptid humanoid. With the mystery and merchandise, many believe that Bigfoot is real. Unfortunately, many believe that the furry beast is simply a hoax. Based on countless discoveries, Bigfoot has existed at some point. Considering the proof presented by dedicated Bigfoot scientists and fans, it would seem ignorant to totally debunk the controversial topic of Bigfoot. Perhaps people are not digging deep enough to actually find the creature. It all started when Bigfoot was captured on film for the first time by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin. In the year of 1967, the two men were out in a remote mountainous location in Northern California. After Patterson heard about the tracks found near Bluff Creek, he was determined to make a documentary about the mysteries of the Sasquatch. Buoyant, he rented a 16mm movie camera and went to the area in question with his comrade, Bob Gimlin. He caught the beast on camera casually strolling through an open clearing, staring at Patterson filming while continuing to walk. The film became known as the Patterson-Gimlin film. According to Animal Planet, "The Patterson-Gimlin film is widely regarded as one of the strongest pieces of evidence for the existence of Sasquatches,” (“The Patterson-Gimlin footage”). Throughout

There have been several similar situations like this in the past. For example we have witnessed how the yeti, bigfoot, and other varieties of so called mythical creatures. The public may be able to just simply write these so called mythical beliefs off but the people that were the eyewitnesses can not do this. People have collaborated with professionals to try and make sense of what they have claimed to see. Nearly every witness has some form of proof for dogman in 2006 a man in Troy, Michigan allegedly contacted onstar, a security system for cars, after running his car off of the road. He supposedly swerved to avoid hitting an animal in the middle of the road. He claimed that this animal was a great big dog that ran in front of him. Another man claims that Dogman scratched his thigh when he was trying to run past him. To this date there have been no reports of any injuries or deaths from the dogman. Although none of them are confirmed, there are many people that go missing in Michigan forests each and every year.

I give a warning to those who research them, that seek them out, that want to have an encounter, who think the Bigfoot has some knowledge or wisdom to impart, they are not what you think they are, they are the descendants of the Nephilim, they are deceiving you at best and luring you in at worst. The disturbing question is, what are they luring you into? Don’t be one of those that disappear to find out.

Although the specifics of Bigfoot may be vague, almost every culture has had its own stories regarding the human-like creatures that roam the world.

The first explanation that verifies why Bigfoot is fake is because of the lack of evidence. For example, according to the Fox article, no evidence in the form of fossils have ever existed. Also, "There's no hard evidence in the form of bones. There are no hair samples, there are

Qualities and characteristics make a monster what it seems. Some of which the Loch Ness Monster contain are flippers, sharp teeth for hunting prey, a long neck, and reptile-like features. They describe Nessie as being plesiosaur-like animal relating to the marine animals of the Mesozoic Era. Reports and sightings don’t really feed into the curiosity and wonder, it leaves out a lot of answers and little evidence to the questions everyone has on their mind. As the effect, it causes people to go on the hunt and search for the monster they have yet to see enough