Bilinguals Are Not Two Monolinguals in One Head

2256 Words Apr 24th, 2015 10 Pages
The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person

Early studies on bilingualism have spread the idea that bilingualism was a disadvantage, that it might help developing anomalies (Pichon and Borel-Maisonny, 1937) or deteriorate children’s intelligence (Eichorn-Jones: 1952). From the 1970s onwards, more extensive and in-depth studies have discredited this idea that bilingualism was cognitively damaging and have shown the complexity and the specific characteristics of bilingual acquisition. Among these fundamental research, we can find Volterra & Taeschner (1978), Grosjean (1989), Romaine (1989), De Houwer (1995) and Genesee (1996), to name but a few. These research have highlighted the fact that Bilingual First Language Acquisition
…show more content…
Grosjean (1989) stipulated that bilinguals couldn’t be overgeneralised as being two monolinguals. He emphasised on the fact that since bilinguals have more opportunities to shift between different languages, their proficiency may not be compared to individuals who only speak one language. Bilinguals, in their social environment, can choose to speak either in one of their two languages or in a ‘third’ language which mixes the grammar and lexicon of both languages. Therefore, he explained that according to which context bilinguals are confronted, they might choose one language over the other because the feel more familiar with it or because they feel more conformable speaking this language for this specific topic. Grosjean (1999) explained that bilinguals activate their knowledge of each of their languages more or less strongly, in relation to the multifaceted social contexts in which they interact with others.

In order to identify in what circumstances monolingual and bilingual acquisitions contrast, we first need to determine the similarities in language acquisition that both monolinguals and bilinguals go through.
All monolinguals across the world achieve language competences through similar milestones occurring at fairly similar ages. They first go through a babbling stage, a holophrastic stage, a two-word stage, a telegraphic stage to finish with the later multiword stage at