Bill Clinton Immigration Policy Analysis

Hillary believes the immigration enforcement needs to be humane, watched and affected. Hillary will focus on those who are doing illegal things and deporting those individuals who put on a violent act to public safety, and ensure refugees who seek asylum in the U.S have a fair chance to tell their stories. She believes we are for families and need to pull it together and help with the problems that revolve around our broken immigration system. The American people support comprehensive immigration not just because it’s the right thing to do, but because it will help all of us, strengthening our community and economy.

America has the largest illegal-immigrant population in the world. As a country we are not doing much to stop it. According to the Pew Research Center, there were approximately 5.7 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. in 1995. As of 2014, there are around 11.3 million living in America. Immigration is vital to this country. Unless you are 100% full blooded native, somewhere down your family’s history you immigrated to this county. It is evident that something needs to be done to fix our immigration system, but what? Strengthening our borders, and deporting illegal immigrants are not long term solutions to the United States’ problem. By passing legislation and making simple changes to our immigration and naturalization policy,

She also wants to end the three- and 10-year bars which penalizes illegal immigrants from returning to the U.S. after leaving the country. Hillary has also said she will defend President Obama’s executive actions, known as DACA and DAPA. DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) allows children who arrived in the U.S before sixteen years old may be protected from being deported. DAPA (Deferred Action for Parents of Americans

Hillary Clinton has an extremely different view on Immigration than Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton believes that as

Hillary Clinton decided to take the pro borrowers stance. She want to assist borrowers and help them with repaying back the loans. Clinton always fought to make college affordable through her whole political career. Started from expanding students

Clinton is introducing a comprehensive immigration reform. She will establish a complete immigration reform that includes extensive and fair citizenship. At the same time, it will protect our borders with a national security, and treat each citizen with admiration, welcoming millions of hard workers who deserve to live in the economy. “We should be deporting criminals, not hard working immigrant families who do the very best they can,” Clinton said. This statement can be a harder one to debate, considering every American ancestors or families now can only have the American Dream. Hillary believes that having an immigration reform will also create more than enough jobs for everyone. It is very necessary for American citizens to have pride and pleasure in their

Correspondence should be addressed to Calli N. Morrison and Constance R. Tullis, School of Social Work, Ross Hall, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, 2801 S. University Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72204.

Senator Elizabeth Warren emphasizes that every person has the right of education, but most retreat because of the huge debts they are drowning in. Instead of investing in a better future for the country, most states were raising interest rates on student debts in order to benefit the government (Wang, 2014). She mentions how this can affect the economy of the country by disallowing young people from spending and investing in big corporations. Student debts have risen increasingly throughout the years and Warren insists on tackling the issue by attempting to decrease the interest rates on these loans (Wang, 2014). She has negotiated a bill with Senator

Immigration policies have had a tendency to violate human rights. These immigration policies, along with others, resulted in the global apartheid in the U.S. Some policies required more patrol enforcement at the border which made the journey for immigrants to the U.S. more rigorous. This enforcement has caused for immigrants to actually not look into migrating to the U.S. Also, with the local law enforcement working together with the border patrol has resulted into a huge problem, racial profiling. In racial profiling, even though there are immi-grants from all over the world, Latinos are mostly targeted. The policies, while they have in-creased deportation rates, they have affected the deportee’s U.S. citizen children.

On the end of the Democratic Party, both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders presented comprehensive plans to help eliminate student debt, although they vary on how to deal with the cost of education and how much the government should pay (Josuweit, 2016). Clinton created the “New College Compact,” to address both the current and future educational costs, her main focus on addressing existing debt and allowing borrowers to refinance student loans at the rates allowed to students taking out new loans, which Clinton claims would provide to relief to twenty five million borrowers (Josuweit, 2016). In addition to this, Clinton wants to reduce interest rates on new student loans which would facilitate enrollment in IDR plans (Josuweit, 2016). On future tuition, Clinton claimed she would provide help so that students never have to borrow to pay for tuition and other fees attending a four year public college in state (Josuweit, 2016).

“The hardest thing about going to college should not be paying for it” (Hillary Clinton). In the past decades college tuition has skyrocketed. Many aspiring students who dream of college education cannot afford it. Education used to be accessible to all forms of family situations, now it is only a privilege for those with substantial incomes. Because everyone deserves education, college tuition should be affordable and economically feasible for all students and their families.

College tuition has increased throughout the past decade, with little change on making the costs more affordable. With the recession state spending on higher education has decreased by 20 percent, and colleges have raised tuition, passing the costs onto students and their families. This paper will analyze Hillary Clinton’s New College Compact, and how the compact will alleviate the cost barriers and allow for affordable, higher education. Using Standfort & Moulton’s multilevel and effective policy implementation practices, this paper will discuss the merits of the plan and how well the College Compact attempts to solve college affordability, but does not take into effect the unintended consequences, such as, actor cooperation or the specifics on how the policy will gain funding.

One of the most popular ideas offered is to increase taxes for the rich in order to reduce interest rates for student loans. This has also been a very popular topic during the Presidential Campaign of 2016. United States Senator Bernie Sanders has proposed an idea in his 2016 presidential campaign that calls for free higher education. His solution urges public colleges and universities to meet the financial need of the lowest-income students. He also proposes that low-income students use state, federal, and institutional aid to cover additional expenses. He has also stated he would like to see an increase in federal aid programs for college students in debt. Another Democrat in the 2016 presidential campaign is Hillary Clinton. She has proposed a higher education plan called “The New College Compact”. "No family and no student should have to borrow to pay tuition at a public college or university, and everyone who has student debt should be able to finance it at lower rates", Clinton stated in speech she gave in New Hampshire. The plan aims at lowering interest rates of current student loans and encourages students to attend and graduate higher education schools. One change that was made by the federal government was by President Obama in 2010. He reformed the Direct Loan program into the “Obama Student Loan Forgiveness” program. Some of the policies issued in this new program include making people

It is a voluntary program that was established in 1997 under the pilot program for six states. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Social Security Administration manage this immigration system. It permits employers to validate the immigration status of employed workers. Nowadays it is progressively required for businesses with government contracts. This immigration system includes a photo matching tool that wants employers to compare a recently hired worker’s government-issued ID to the image of the card collected in the database of the Department of Homeland Security. The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act established this system to enhance border security against illegal immigrants. The

Policies are pivotal implementations put in place by the government on local, state, and federal levels. There are endless amounts of policies enacted by the American government, with many of these policies directly influencing the lives of citizens. As the 2016 Presidential Election draws near, understanding the policies projected by each presidential candidate is essential to making an educated decision when it comes to voting for the future condition of the United States. The two primary candidates for the upcoming election, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton propose policies and plans that are in opposition to one another. One of the policies that is receiving a great deal of attention in the media right now is the issue of immigration. This issue poses a difficult question regarding how to address the presence of illegal immigrants in the United States. On one hand, immigration supports the rights of immigrants, but on the other hand, this policy limits opportunities for Americans. Due to my lack of knowledge in the area of immigration, I have decided to further investigate this issue in order to understand how Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton plan to address immigration if they are elected to office. Each candidate has plentiful ideas regarding immigration that will result in a number of benefits and/or consequences for both Americans and immigrants. Besides solely looking at the positions held by the