Bill Nye : Science Guy, Television Fame And The Ceo Of Answers

Speaking from scientific view, Darwin's theory has many loop- holes, according to Charles Darwin, "according to Darwin himself" might sound better (nwcreation.net)…I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science….It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.” Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475. It violates the Law of Themodynamics, which state that energy cannot be lost or gained, only transformed different types of energy. However, the big bang theory of Darwin's Evolution guess is that the Earth suddenly gained a huge burst of energy that created life, which is complete paradox of the Law. Since the Law of Thermodynamics is approved by all scientist while-->which the Evolution/ Big bang theory is still in doubt, this would make the theory of Evolution unreliable and possibly false. Evolution is one of the less perfect solutions to explaining the

Through the analysis of the major televised debate, held February this year, between the popular science communicator, Bill Nye, and the US-based Australian creationist, Ken Ham. It has come to light that through careful analysis and research it is my belief that scientists should not be involved within any debates “scientific” or otherwise regarding topics pertaining to creationism or any other religious perspective. The inappropriate use of the loose definitions of science and religion lead to the intertwining of the two subjects that are extremely different in methodology, leaving the audience up for misinterpretation. While the debate did bring about the topic to the forefront of the public, which in itself was a positive, I do not believe that the post debate result was a win for science. Bill Nye’s derogatory demeanour represented post debate towards Ken Ham was in turn a representation of institutional science. Leading to which the validity of the debate and post debate could be brought into question.

There is proof of this evolution all around us. Man itself has evolved over thousands and thousands of years in direct relation to the changing environment surrounding them. There are facts and proof to back up the theory of evolution, but that does not mean that it is the only way that explains development of living things.

Evolution represents the biological timeline between all living things around the world. This idea or theory of evolution is called Darwinism. The idea of evolution was first published in a book called On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin. The theory of evolution greatly contradicts the idea of creationism in religion that all living

For as long as mankind has had the curiosity to gaze at the stars, we have been constantly questioning our origin and place in the universe. From simple, yet elegant solutions (like our world being on the back of a large tortoise) to the more complex pantheons of gods and heavens, humanity’s dedication to classifying and comprehending our universe has enabled us to weave rich and complex mythologies and beliefs. However, in America today there are two prominent paradigms that are shaping how we see the world—Christian creationism and scientific evolution. These two schools of thought, like many other conflicting models of the universe and its creation, have fueled passions and incited spirited rivalries among its most ardent followers and fanatics, but, again like many other opposing beliefs, at the same time it is easy to see how they can be reconciled both within and without oneself. However, many scientists and theologians believe that one of the two is blasphemous and the other is gospel (or textbook) truth. For example, in Scott D Sampson’s essay Evoliteracy, (2006) Sampson denounces Christianity and pushes for everyone to learn the theory of Evolution instead of creationism. While he is correct in wanting a more educated populace, Christianity is not an inherently wrong construct. Similarly, many of those pushing for intelligent design have similarly decried the evolutionary theory as

Stephen Jay Gould was an American paleontologist, biologist and also one of the most influential spokesman of his generation. Gould had written a lot of notable papers in which a few have landed around the word Evolution. Evolution has been divided in to two categories, evolutionists, who believe that living organisms have modified over a very long period of time and have ended up into evolving or, creationists who believe that we didn’t evolve from any form but that we were made from a supernatural being “God”.

Scientists has proved many points on how this earth came to be and how life formed. They can show evidence through many years of research and hard work to prove religion wrong. But they don't want to prove religion wrong, they just want religious people to accept the fact that science does exist and it's true. In “Transcript of Ken Ham vs Bill Nye Debate” describes the “arrogance” of religious people and how science is believable though many years of research. As seen in the article Ken Ham would always deny the fact that science isn't real or true and would always result back to the bible. Ham focused too much on historical science. As Nye requested of Ham, present your model, make a prediction, and then let’s observe if the data supports. Both evolution and creation models do have a historical element, but both should also have a predictable observable element. It's like so sad that he believes only in the bible and not trusting science. Science plays a big role in society because of all the strange phenomenal it explains. Like, physics and how it is in our everyday life even if we don't notice it to what is real, what is practical, and how things work. It's true on how science has become a major part of our lives even if we don't believe in it. People who just believe in their religion and not science need to start giving it a chance because it's just so sad and arrogant. Evolution tells us, in detail, what happens over time to populations of organisms in a complex

Evolution theory is not true because it gives a vague explanation of how the world developed to be what it is today and it also fails to explain why it is no longer going on today. As absurd as it is there are people in the world today who believe it majority of them being atheist.

Evolution is a mysterious topic, as there is just so much evidence that has been found by many people throughout history. The first person to spread the idea of evolution was Charles Darwin. He helped to spread the idea of evolution to others such as Gregor Mendel, and helped many others to accept the findings of Boucher de Perthes. Evolution is defined by the changes of organisms throughout time to better the survival rate of said group of organisms.(definitions, 2009) The generations of organisms therefore evolve through time as the changes occur. There are many pieces of evidence such as, analogous and homologous structures in organisms, cladograms, the order of appearance of structures during embryological development, and fossil records. Evidence of evolution at it’s finest.

This is an editorial or a think-piece without a particular designation, please think of it as you would a “Consider the Following” segment on Bill Nye the Science Guy. It is going to present some information and opinions and you can do with them what you will, should you choose to read it! I have a desire to talk about entertainment and the attitudes surrounding it, somewhere along the lines of a “what is art?” sort of conversation, but less lofty and more specific to a particular range of ideas and opinions. I also want to talk about binaries, our collective fascination with them here in America, and in particular the one concerning work and play. I want to talk about self-expression and catharsis and how we like to believe and enforce that

An argument commonly used against evolution is that it is “just a theory” therefore it is the same thing as a guess. In science, the word “theory” has a different meaning than when used in everyday life. A scientific theory is a hypothesis that is well

Evolution is a real thing that happened and is still happening today, there is so much evidence to prove it. We have the fossil record, we know how natural selection works and how and why it happens, and we know how artificial selection works and that we use it all of the time today. There is just too much evidence to call evolution just a theory.

The foundation for the theory of evolution was laid by Charles Darwin (Rose, n.d.). He developed hypotheses about natural selection which helped scientists develop the theory. Evolution is a theory and not a hypothesis because evolution has been proven by vast amounts of scientific data, research, and testing. The definition of a hypothesis is an educated explanation that needs to be researched and tested but has not yet been proven (Earman, 1984). There has been no scientific evidence to disprove the theory of evolution.

Chapters 1 and 2 of Genesis teach us about the natural world and that God created everything. The argument of evolution can be proved wrong reading the first chapter of Genesis. “In the beginning, God created the heavens and earth” (Genesis 1:1, NLT) He created the world in six days, on each day he would add something new to his list of creations such as light, darkness, sky, seas, plants and animals, and finally man and woman “On the seventh day God had

Evolution has been debated for many years. Most scientists assume evolution to be true, but it is not officially proven. Evolution is known as “fact and theory,” because it is a fact that organisms have changed over time, but the mechanism that changes those organisms is uncertain. One of the major debates regarding evolution is the belief in creationism. Creationists believe that the Universe and organisms on Earth were all created by a divine power. There are also some theories in which creationism and evolution coexist. One idea is that the divine being who created the world used evolution as a method. Another idea is that science and religion are actually the same thing and religion explains the unknown parts of science. For example, science says that the world couldn’t have been created in seven days, but one of God’s days may not be the same length