Bill Of Rights During The Nineteenth Century

Human rights are rights innate to every single individual, whatever our nationality, where you live, sex, national or ethnic birthplace, color of skin, religion, dialect/language, and many more. We are all similarly qualified for our human rights without segregation. These rights are altogether interrelated, associated and resolute. Widespread human rights are regularly communicated and ensured by law, in the types of treaties, standard global law, general standards and different wellsprings of international. International human rights law sets down commitments of Governments to act in certain routes or to cease from specific acts, keeping in mind the end goal to advance and secure human rights and central flexibilities of people or

James Madison presents the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1). The First Federal Congress then suggests the twelve amendments to the constitution to their state legislatures (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). The very first two articles weren't authorizing. Articles three through twelve were amended on December 15, 1791 (Constitutional Politics in Ohio 1). This was called The Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights became the very first ten amendments to the United States Constitution (Primary Documents 1). Which means the powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited because of it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or even to the

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen was created in 1789 after Louis XIV finally allowed the three estates to meet alongside one another, creating the "National Assembly". It is important to note the era in which it was created because it was created in a time where the feudal system had been the most powerful form of government for hundreds of years.

Human rights can be summarized as the activities and freedoms that all human beings are entitled to enjoy and only by virtue of their humanity. These conditions are generally guaranteed in the constitution of the land. They are widely felt in the area as they are divided and not limited to political, social economic and cultural rights. Some of the main principles of human rights include the fact that they are inherent, inalienable and indivisible as well. In this relation, human rights can never be taken away from an individual whereby the enjoyment of one right should not infringe the enjoyment of other. They must all be respected and maintained.

“It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our prosperity, but to the whole people - women as well as men.”(BrainyQuote), a quote said by activist Susan B. Anthony. August 18, 1920, the 19th Amendment was added to the U.S Constitution which granted American women the right to vote (History). If “it was we the people” (BrainyQuote) who formed the Union, then what happened before August 18, 1920?

In his book titled The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction, Akhil Amar tries to offer the interpretation of the Bill Rights by evoking the world of framers of the constitution and that of the people who amended the constitution. According to Amar, there are numerous differences about the original bill of rights as they were originally framed and those that are contained in the Fourteenth Amendment of 1868. Amar tries to construct a theory of Bill of Rights that is comprehensive by focusing on the implications that are drawn from constitutional text as well as its structure. Amar points out, “The main goal of the Federalists was to forge set of the federally enforceable rights which were against the abusive state governments and this resulted to Fourteenth Amendment” (4). The book tries to explain the first 10 amendments by interpreting them and offering the new insights. This essay focuses on discussing the differences between the Founding Fathers Bill of Rights and the Reconstruction Amendments as it argued by Amar.

The day that the bill of rights stared was in the 1791. They served as the cornerstone of the basic

In the 1900’s women did not have the same rights as men. They weren’t allowed to do certain things and are not considered equal. Once women started to protest this, the whole nation got involved and there were some disagreements. The amendment was first proposed in 1878 to Congress but not seriously considered. In the early 1900’s a Representative proposed the Susan B. Anthony Amendment to allow women the right to vote. After the amendment passed in the House of Representatives, the Senate also passed the amendment. The vote then went to the states and it was one shy state away from the two thirds requirement and it was all up to Tennessee to break the vote. The decision was all up to Republican Harry T. Burn who was against the amendment but his mom was the one to change his mind. With a change in Tennessee’s vote the amendment officially passed the nineteenth amendment on June 4, 1919. The whole question is who supported and who opposed the passing of the nineteenth amendment? The people who obviously supported the nineteenth amendment were the women across the nation. Some more than others but in some way all women wanted to be treated equal. There were even some men who supported the amendment like Frederick Douglass who was a former African-American slave. Even though it seems like a lot of people want this amendment to pass and agree to equal rights, there were people who did oppose to the passing of the amendment. Being mostly men, an even bigger group disagreed with

Well of course! The amendment was passed by congress on June 4th 1919. And it was ratified on August 18, 1920

The Bill of Rights applies inside the US and protects people from the federal government since states had their constitution.

The fore father's spent many agonizing hours in the summer heat to ensure the future people of America would maintain liberty among other things. The people are supposed to run the government, not the other way around. The amendment proposes that people should be able to make their own decisions about what they choose to purchase. American's need to remember where they came from and look to where they are going. By ratifying this amendment, America is taking back control and stopping the government from forcing us to purchase goods and services from their or other dominating companies. Saying yes to this amendment brings America one step closer to the ideals we all dream about. The government cannot and will not tell the people how to spend

The Bill of Rights were ratified on December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments in the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution was the basic human rights of America’s citizens as well as the foundation (or basic) laws for the citizens to follow. There were many people who were for and against the whole “freedom” from Britain, Federalists and Anti-federalists. Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist, he did not agree that the Bill of Rights was something that America needed. Alexander Hamilton believed that the president should serve for his lifetime, and he should have the final “say” in everything.

The Bill of Rights were added after the new U.S. Constitution was first ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the US Constitution, it guaranteed such rights as the freedoms of speech, assembly, and worship. The Amendments created a black and white outline to what people would be allowed to do in this country, but, at points, the amendments have grey areas that can be used to justify actions of people considered guilty. Any case can be based around one of the Bill of Rights, like a case that went to the courts in January 17, 2014, was about a family fighting the eighth amendment, which is bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

First is the document which came to embody the French Revolutionary ideals of Equalite, Liberte, et Fraturnate: The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen. Promulgated on August 26, 1789, this document

The doctrine of human rights were created to protect every single human regardless of race, gender, sex, nationality, sexual orientation and other differences. It is based on human dignity and the belief that no one has the right to take this away from another human being. The doctrine states that every ‘man’ has inalienable rights of equality, but is this true? Are human rights universal? Whether human rights are universal has been debated for decades. There have been individuals and even countries that oppose the idea that human rights are for everybody. This argument shall be investigated in this essay, by: exploring definitions and history on human rights, debating on whether it is universal while providing examples and background