preview

Billy Mitchell Analysis

Good Essays

Billy Mitchell was an Army Brigadier General and a famed aviator, considered by many to be the father of the United States Air Force, he was one of the loudest proponents of air power after World War I. He is also one of the most polarizing figures in aviation. People argue how helpful he actually was to the development of US aviation. William D. O’Neil, argues that his campaign to promote airpower was handled the wrong way. His use of scare tactics, embellishments of fact and prediction, and his confrontational attitude actually limited his ability to compromise with other branches and effectively sell his ideas. An author in support of Mitchell, Robert Burlingame, stated that World War II was the proving grounds and vindication of Billy Mitchell, that he could not have acted any other way, and his loud voice kept him in the minds of all those who heard him, making sure his ideas were not forgotten. In this paper, the argument of critic, William D. O’Neil, will be analyzed along with the advocate, Robert Burlingame will be presented, both sides will be evaluated, and then a synthesis will be made. The author, William D. O’Neil is one of the opponents of Billy Mitchell and his tactics. He is chief scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses. He has been an active duty and reserve Naval officer, Department of Defense engineering official, and defense industry executive. He also heavily researched Billy Mitchell, using thirty-seven resources for a fairly concise article,

Get Access