Biography Of Montague John Druit

The worst thing about Jack the Ripper is the way that he murdered his victims. It was not just a quick stab or a bullet, but sheer violence. He ripped them to pieces. Most of his victims weren’t recognizable after he was done with them. That is how he got his name, Jack the Ripper.

Jack the Ripper was one of the most famous and renowned killers in history. Even though he was not the first serial killer, he was the first killer to strike on a metropolis setting. Jack the Ripper was in his prime at a time when the media had a strong control over society and society as a whole was becoming much more literate. Jack started his killing campaign at a time of political controversy between the liberals and social reformers along with the Irish Home rule partisans. The reports of Jack the Ripper were collected and reported by the police, but then the different newspapers with their political influences slightly distorted the stories to give them their own effect. It has been more the one hundred years since the last murder

Thesis Statement: A research paper of the mysterious and famous 19th century serial killer Jack the Ripper and how it is that the legend came to be.

Despite the fact that no-one was ever brought to justice or charged with the murders, there have been more than a hundred named suspects who may or may not have been Jack the Ripper. Aaron Kosminski, Thomas Cutbush and Montague Druitt are some of the interesting suspects, whereas Prince Albert Edward Victor, the Freemasons, and Lewis Carroll are some of the ridiculous

According to Exodus 20:13 “you shall not murder,” however the world consists of countless people who disobey this command. Murderers are especially horrific if they are serial killers because it is awful enough to kill one person, but to murder repeatedly is sickening. It is extremely depressing to know that some murderers never get caught. One of the most infamous serial killers whose identity was never uncovered is Jack the ripper. Numerous people have different theories relating to who Jack the ripper was, but none have been proven. One main theory is that America’s first serial killer, H. H. Holmes was London’s Jack the ripper. To find evidence to prove the theory of whether or not H. H. Holmes was Jack the ripper; crucial evidence to look at are the similarities between the killers.

The Whitechapel Murders and those of Jack the Ripper are not generally one and the same. Over a period of three years towards the end of the nineteenth century a number of prostitutes were murdered under different circumstances – the murder of prostitutes was not an especially unique occurrence during those times but several of the murders drew particular attention on account of the savagery with which the victim's bodies were mutilated. Within the Whitechapel Murders was a cluster of murders that demonstrated sufficient similarities as to suggest that they were committed by the same person. One of the first instances of serial murder was thus identified and sensationalised in the media as the work of ‘Jack the Ripper', nicknamed on the

There were a number of reasons for why the infamous serial killer known as Jack the Ripper managed to escape with the killings which he did to prostitutes in Whitechapel. There was no single reason for why the Ripper managed to escape from the police however there was a number of reasons such as the nature of the Whitechapel, the Rippers methods, the role of the press, other stories which conflicted to theories of who the Ripper was, mistakes of the police force and the limitations of them.

Fredrick Deeming has been accused of being Jack the Ripper due to sightings of him in Whitechapel during the Whitechapel

(Jones 1). Kosminski was held in the asylum in the late 1800’s due to his mental disorders like paranoia. Fortunately, he was pleaded innocent because he was only violent but not homicidal. As the lead investigator, Macnaghten also suspected, college graduate and athlete, Montague John Druitt. The own family of Druitt believed that they he was the killer. After, the death of the last victim, Mary Jane Kelly, Montague was found drowned in the Thames river. His death struck even more suspicion within the case, and many proposed that he killed himself because he was the murderer. Many theorists believe the royal family had something with the murders. Stephen Knight’s novel, “Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution”, talks about how the royal family was involved and the family doctor suspected odd connections. Prince Albert Victor brought more attention to the case since his unexpected death like his physician. Though the killer was never found, we can see if someone killed those woman or numerous people

The history of Jack the Ripper is mysterious. The main reason why is because nobody could or can find out who Jack the Ripper really was. He was a figure that came out from the shadows for only a couple of months, brutally murdered 5 women and then disappeared never to be seen again. All anyone oils tell about Jack was that this figure had to have known about the human anatomy to make these murders so brutal and give everyone the idea that this person had a severe hatred for other people.

Why is Jack the Ripper seen as one of Britain’s most notorious serial killers of all time? Evidence suggest that he simply could have been a scapegoat for the overcrowded parish of Whitechapel which had vast amounts of crime including burglary and high levels of alcohol dependency which lead to many brothels opening and the number of prostitutes in Whitechapel rising dramatically. So was Jack the Ripper even a real serial killer? Or does theory explain that his murders could have been cover ups put in place to create a moral panic to reduce the number of working prostitutes as they had become scared of being murdered. If Jack the Ripper was not a scapegoat the New Right would argue that it is likely he made a rational calculation of the consequences of his crimes and carried them out because the benefit to society was greater than the cost to him, the New Right would have blamed Jack the Rippers criminal activities on poor socialisation from his family. Postmodernist authors Levin and McDevitt would argue he was a criminal but he only committed these crimes because he needed variation from his daily routine and killing the prostitutes was giving him the thrills and excitement that he needed in his life. A combination of all these different arguments and possible explanations creates debates that draw me into the study of Sociology and Criminology.

It was probably true to the others. In addition, a reason why the police were not to blame for not capturing Jack the Ripper is because the areas where the victims were killed were known to be a resort of prostitute and dark secluded streets, as Source E refers to the streets as "…narrow, dark and crooked lanes…", were ideal for business. Whilst in the act of this business they were completely vulnerable to attack. Before she could utter a cry, the Ripper seized her by the throat. He strangled her, at least into insensibility and lowered her to the ground like Source C states in the report on the body of Elizabeth Stride "...

To this day, Jack the Ripper is still infamously recognised as the brutal murderer of at least 5 victims. With such great attention by the media, he was able to cause a dramatic fright to the civilians and have his name voiced throughout Victorian England. Even today, many scholars are seduced by the prospect of uncovering identity of the man behind one of the most infamous whodunits in history.

Jack the Ripper is regarded as the first ever serial killer. I think he was the first serial killer, because all the murderers did not seem to have a purpose. The murders were not done for sex, money or Jealousy. Psychology was not yet a science and murder for sexual desire was not an idea understood at those times. Also brutality of the crimes were shocking. The woman were not only stabbed but were butchered.

Jack the Ripper was said to be the first serial killer in the modern sense. In the article “The Hunt for Jack the Ripper,” William D. Rubinstein’s main idea is to explain and examined some of the murder victims, and possible suspects for Jack the Ripper. Rubinstein goes into great detail to try and define who the ripper actually was, but this is still an unsolved mystery in history. Rubinstein’s main ideas are the different possibilities for Jack the Ripper; however there was one person in particular that people believed was the Ripper for over twenty years. Another main part of this article was discussing victims of Jack the