Biological Scientific Research Paper

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

people believe that it is too risky and unethical. Reproductive cloning has shown advantages and

Today’s technology develops so quickly that many impossible things become true; the example is cloning technology. Cloning is a process used to create an exact copy of a mammal by using the complete genetic material of a regular body cell. Different from the common propagate, cloning needs only one cell and without sex. Cloning, as of recent years, has become a very controversial issue in society but cloning can have several positive effects for the well being of society. Many people in society believe that scientists should develop a clone human but many people and especially the government are against human cloning. Hundreds of

While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be

Cloning should be allowed since it has proven to be useful in the reparation of damaged organs, limiting diseases and strengthening endangered species. Cloning can rebuild organs because it can recreate parts of the heart that were damaged from a heart attack and reverse traumatic injuries. Destroyed brain cells can be repaired, restoring the body back to normal. Cloning has helped scientists create genetically modified pigs for the study of effective treatment of human diseases. It can also limit diseases by removing a defective gene that can cause the disease or even allow scientists to remove a genetic disease before birth. Cloning can strengthen endangered species because it will quicken the reproduction process so that the animal population

In my opinion, cloning is a very serious and controversial topic. There have been and will be lots more debates to decide on the rules of cloning. Many people could argue that cloning an animal is just like playing God. Others are just afraid of the outcome of cloning a human and prefer not to try it. Either way, there is a high margin for error. Personally, I am on the “don’t play God” side of the debate. Humans are so complex, that we don’t even know everything about ourselves. Why should we make another one of us, if we don’t even understand completely how it works?

Human cloning is one of the most controversial topics regarding modern science, and the advances of genealogical study. There are many opposing views on the topic. Many people chose to bring things such as human safety, implications on basic morality, and even the violation of things such as religion and nature itself into the debate. Both sides of the infamous "cloning debate" have their standings, and both sides propose valid points. Human cloning however should be legalized and funded because of how new it is to modern science, the many benefits to be had in the scientific field of biology from it, and the benefit that could be had in the medical field.

Human and animal cloning should be banned, that's what i believe. Animal cloning is not as bad as human cloning but it should be banned. The procedure to clone a human or a animal is difficult, risky, and most important expensive. Also many people are against it and if it becomes legal or official it could cause polemics between our people and religions.

Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C). Restricting human cloning would be a violation of that right. Just as people can choose not to reproduce using contraception, abortion, or abstinence, people should be allowed to use all means possible within their ability to reproduce, such as through cloning and in vitro fertilization (C). Cloning is the application of this right specifically (C). Another benefit of cloning is the ability to clone someone who has died to console those who are grieving over their lost loved one or to clone the DNA of a person that was known for his of her greatness. Scientists would be able to recreate these people in a new environment (C). A clone's parent may have come from

Who would not enjoy the ability to clone whatever they wanted? People have given thought to cloning throughout the years; imagine what it would be like to clone yourself or clone other people. People constantly imagine how other people see them and with cloning it is possible. Not all people support cloning though, as some people think it is a cheat or just plain wrong for ethical or religious reasons. Cloning is the process of creating an identical copy of the original thing being cloned. The first nuclear transfer happened in 1952 when scientist found that they were able to remove the nucleus from a frog egg and replace it with the nucleus of an embryonic frog cell. This resulted in the eggs developing into tadpoles. Through this process of nuclear transfer, the world began to find out that nuclear transfer could lead to therapeutic cloning. A few years later, a sheep is cloned through nuclear transfer as well. Many years laters, in 1996 the first mammal was to be cloned from the cells of an adult animal. This animal was later named Dolly the sheep. After the discovery that things could be cloned from the cells of an adult organism, scientist began to argue that cloning was a good way to bring back extinct things like the passenger pigeon. Even today, government officials, scientists and the common people are constantly debating whether cloning should be allowed and or if cloning should be accessible to every person out there. There should be a ban or a law against human

Genetically identical clones occur naturally in identical twins, so why do people believe that human cloning is so unethical? Cloning became a public issue in 1996 when Dolly, the first successfully cloned animal, was born. Since then, many people have found that the new possibility of human cloning is frightening due to societal values and the processes by which clones are produced. However, cloning can also benefit human health because of new innovations being able to save people’s lives, who previously had little or no chance of living beyond a hospital bed.

Cloning is mostly found in Sci-Fi books and movies. However, cloning has become something scientists in today’s society are striving toward. Scientists are hoping to clone humans in the near future. The idea of cloning may seem like an exciting idea to some people, but the idea is actually very harmful. Cloning is an unethical practice and should be outlawed due to the moral issues and the health problems caused in cloned organisms.

To start, the most important reason to support cloning, is that cloning production will save more lives. The many people

When you think of cloning what does your mind begin to think about? It thinks of the cloning of humans, and many people are unhappy with the fact that this may be coming soon. However, some people still like the benefits that could come with cloning. Human cloning should give us many unbelieveable medical

Although many scientists are in the field of cloning, many other people have scientific reasons why this shouldn’t happen. One reason is that if a human clone