Bite-Wing Radiographic Analysis

Today, it is possible for orthodontist to take a highly accurate, digital 3D image of the inside of a patient’s mouth. Gone are the days of goop and gagging that are associated with conventional impressions. The iTero Scanner creates almost flawless images of the patient’s teeth and gum tissues the first time so aligners, retainers, appliances and restorations can be more accurate and fit better.

In addition, bite mark analysis is also controversial because dental profiles are subject to change. The loss and/or chipping of teeth, or the alteration of arch configuration through a variety of procedures, such as the use of braces, is common in human populations. The onset of oral diseases such as dental caries has been shown to alter the arch and tooth configuration and must be taken into account when comparing a dental profile to the bite mark after a significant amount of time has passed since the mark was made.[9] All of these variables affect the validity of a bite mark analysis and trying to identify an biter through the uniqueness of his or her dentition.

Patients find they can reduce the amount of time needed for active orthodontic treatment with the help of Ortho-Tain and save money in the process, MegaBiteDental.com explains

At the initial visit the patient’s plaque index was 43% and the plaque score was 55%. The most amount of plaque was present in the posterior regions in both the maxillary and mandibular quadrants. The anterior teeth suffered from a fair amount of attrition. Plaque was being retained in the grooves and pits of the damaged teeth. The patient also had slight interproximal plaque. Number 18 was chipped measially and was missing half of the large amalgam restoration. It had the most biofilm build up covering almost every aspect of the tooth, including the inside portion, which was exposed to oral cavity. When asked why she felt this was a problem area for her she responded that food constantly gets trapped inside and it’s painful, it hurts to brush. A large interproximal lesion on number 8 adjacent to porcelain fused to metal crown retained a considerable amount of biofilm also. The large and old amalgam restorations posteriorly were wearing away at the margins creating grooves and fissures on the occlusal surfaces also retaining plaque. I asked her if she felt like her diet or habits may be contributing to any oral pain or problems she is having. She answered honestly by saying she knows she harming not only her teeth but also her body. She wants to eat better and quit smoking, but she still gets pleasure when indulging and just isn’t ready to give up things she loves yet. She did agree to try and change some of her oral hygiene

An orofacial examination was performed to assess the structural and functional integrity of the oral mechanism. The exam did not reveal anything of clinical significance.

Film radiography is the traditional method by which dentists have been retrieving dental X-rays of their patients’ mouths for years. This method, as its name indicates, requires the use of traditional film. Film radiography offers images in about 16-25

Bite marks has put many people in jail. Bite marks evidence is part of the forensic odontologist where a dentist uses his expertise to match bite marks that has been left on a person's body with dental records of the suspect to determine whether or not a person has is guilty of a crime or not guilty. Even though Bite mark evidence has been used to prosecute there has been no real research that shows that bite mark evidence is accurate. Being that bite mark evidence has been considered as having no findings that the arrangement of a person's teeth is not unique in a way that a person DNA would be in a criminal proceeding. Because human being skin is stretchy and can deform in a way that it could look like a bite mark impression has been made

Reversal of the normal relationship of upper teeth, which only interfere normal function to a minor degree (less than 2mm).

PA X-rays provide a visual of assessment of tooth and supporting bone structure, detect abnormalities in an area of teeth from the crown to where the root is anchored to the jaw. This is performed to find abnormalities in root structure and surrounding bone.

We use the latest dental technology to help you get the best results possible. We employ digital X-rays, a 3-D CT scanner, CEREC same-day crown milling technology, before and after imaging system, DIAGNOdent laser cavity detection, and more. We are expertly trained to use this equipment to help you get accurate diagnoses and results.

Panoramic Dental Radiography refers to a two-dimensional x-ray examination that captures a single image of the mouth including surrounding structures like the teeth, tissues, the lower and upper jaws. It shows a flat detailed image of curved structures such as jaws. X-ray radiography exposes body tissues to some radiation during the procedure. Panoramic Dental Radiography is extraoral technique that differs from intraoral because it is built with technology which offers more coverage for periapical lesion, periodontal bone defects, and pathological jaw lesion with a minimum risk of side effects to patients. The procedure reveals more details by covering a wide area compared to intraoral x-ray and providing valuable information on bone abnormalities and tooth positioning. Panoramic x-ray shows clear mouth anomalies such as jaw cancer, jaw disorder, sinusitis, and periodontal diseases. All dental radiographer, including Dental Hygienist, should be aware of how Panoramic Dental Radiography imagen can be helpful in order to visualize radiographies with more accurate results.

Bitewings for children are one of the five different types of x-rays that are commonly done as part of a child's dental exam. Their primary purpose is to spot tooth decay or

The most common tool for diagnosing BRONJ, especially for early stages of the disease, is radiological imaging. Three different imaging techniques are commonly employed and each have their advantages and disadvantages. Panoramic radiography takes two-dimensional x-ray images of the jaw area and is beneficial for the detection of abnormalities in the teeth and bone. It is the least expensive of the imaging techniques and can be taken in almost any dental office. However, a major disadvantage of panoramic radiography lies in its accuracy. In a study conducted by Stockmann et al. only 13 out of 24 cases (54%) of BRONJ were detected in the radiograph. A CT scan showed the highest accuracy in the detection of BRONJ and has the capacity to construct three-dimensional images, an important feature when assessing pre-surgical cases. However, there is a significant deviation in the detection of the actual size of a BRONJ lesion with a CT scan. The third imaging technique is the MRI; it is slightly less accurate in the detection of BRONJ than a CT scan, but is more accurate in the measurement of the actual size of the lesion when compared to the size found intra-operatively. Overall, both CT scans and MRIs are useful tools in diagnosing BRONJ in patients who express no clinical symptoms, but difficulties with spatial resolution create a problem with taking reliable measurements of the actual site of injury. (Stockmann et al., 2010).

When taking bitewing radiographs digitally, it is best to take the premolar area first. When a premolar radiograph is taken before the molars, it will give the practitioner a map for taking the molar radiograph. If crowns are high under the tissue, it will allow it to be seen prior to the taking of the next radiograph. This will give an idea of how high the PID needs to be placed near the facial area of the molars.

It's really interesting to see how the advancement in technology impacts an accused suspect's life. Either by gaining them a conviction or releasing from their imprisonment over time. Even though bite mark evidence is rare it seems to hold great importance when it does appear. Although, Bite mark evidence can be crucial to a case it holds some difficulty to investigators in its preservation. The textbook says "They are generally formed in material that cannot be sent away or kept for a long time without marks changing in appearance due to drying or decomposition of material" (Fisher &Fisher,289). The original bite markings can appear different over time, so it may be hard to prove to the courts that you are 100% sure