preview

Black And White And Dead All Over Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

Directed by Chris Foster, Black and White and Dead All Over portrays a medium of newspapers aren’t getting to the foundation of stories; instead, they are retelling simple facts that many people may have already heard or can assume. Over many newspapers, a conclusion that the reporting quality has become less and less over the years. In the documentary, the narrator’s use interviews, reporter stories, and considerable facts to let the audience know about the lack of high-quality reporting and maintaining circulation throughout the nation. The narrators are notable journalists: Barbara Laker and Wendy Ruderman that have dealt with law-breaking and personal sacrifice to obtain a high-quality story for different newspapers. Interviews that are conducted throughout the film are answered by Pulitzer-prize journalists, along as victims of major stories …show more content…

The film focuses on the negative reporting done by journalists across the nation, but does not accommodate to the good reporting done by journalists. The film does a great job focusing on stories that would evoke emotion and reasoning in the audience by discussing controversial topics. Also, the film has a strength of connecting completely different stories by running the main theme throughout the film. One weakness includes reporting only on stories that are related to their point of reporting on the surface rather than digging into the foundation. Another weakness is not stating the good reports done by journalists in the documentary, but instead focusing on stories that needed the foundation to understand the entire plot. The movie is considered mediocre because of the lack of reaching both sides of the type of reporters. To back it up, the film discusses lapdogs and watch dogs in which, shows the difference in reporters. The audience may have altered their opinion regarding newspapers by realizing the lack of content in the

Get Access