Blood Done Sign My Name essay

For far too long were people not hired because they were black not because they were not qualified, Dr. King made this a point to preach about helping the less fortunate. President Johnson also saw this as a problem with America that needed to be fixed and had some help. “Harrington’s book, the civil rights movement and Kennedy’s assassination helped stimulate President Lyndon Johnson’s “war on poverty.” “ (Jobs and Freedom reading packet pg 142) You could argue that President Johnson did the most for the civil rights movement while in office by helping fight poverty and having the Civil Rights Act of 1964 pass under his Presidency but he definitely used the late memory of JFK to do it. He also had his critics within the black power movement because unlike JFK President Johnson had no problem engaging in Vietnam and taking a more hands on approach to the war. This didn’t sit well with everyone because people were being sent off to fight a war they wanted nothing to do with but wouldn’t be treated like equals once they came home, if they were lucky enough to live the

During the mid-20th century there was much racial discrimination, specifically in home ownership. During this period there was mass immigration of Southern blacks to the north. In Lawndale Chicago, there was adverse reactions to this. As the

The author starts by explaining a question that many people ask about the odd behaviors in poor people and their purchases. She helps to explain this by giving background information on her own family when she was growing up. An event she describes is when her neighbor was unable to obtain benefits to raise her granddaughter after a year, the authors mom dresses “expensively” or nicely to gain an upper hand when asking for their benefits. This is done to further her belief that people buy these things to belong and to gain more privilege. She ends her essay by stating a person cannot judge what a poor person does until they’ve been poor themselves.

During the times of slavery, colored individuals were labeled as “other” in the United States. Black families were categorized as pathological, deviant, and in need of fixing. Black families struggled a lot. Poverty rates were sky high for single women who were the head of their household, especially for Black and Latino women. They were also the face of the homeless community, which was growing rapidly. The government then decided to implement marriage and fatherliness encouragements to ease poverty which resulted in societal problems surrounding the Black and Latino women.

In the early 18th century, there was a supposed shift in the manner of how planters/masters asserted their authority. On one hand, Patriarchalism was know as ultimate authority and was very much so associated with a monarchy. This ideology was a much more strict and harsh method of dominance. The other technique, Paternalism, had the reputation of being much more affectionate and soft, if you will. Historians Kathleen Brown and Philip Morgan took two opposing stances on this topic. Brown, the author of “The Anxious World of the Slave-owning Patriarch”, believed that Paternalism, while most likely was a little more compassionate, was still just a branch under Patriarchalism. Morgan, the author of “The Effects of Paternalism Among Whites and Blacks”, contradicted her by saying that slaves actually benefited from the new paternalistic ideology. While Morgan makes a powerful and credible argument due to the perspective he takes while analyzing Paternalism, Brown’s reasoning is ultimately more persuasive because she looks at many different time periods and utilizes many primary sources.

Many left to the North because it was a place “…where there are no lynchings” (Sandburg 15), a place where they could be safe. The black population in Chicago lived in an area known as the “black belt.” The Negro Migration caused the population in the Chicago “black belt” to more than double from 50,000 to 125,000 making Chicago have the third or fourth largest black population next to New York, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Washington (7).

The north figured that giving the African Americans jobs would help improve the economy. This opportunity of work encouraged the people who had yet to migrate to do so. Those who did were soon disappointed when they discovered their salary. Yes, they were given a job opportunity, but their wages were nowhere near as much as a white person’s.

“No thank you, I think we’re just looking for now.” My mom replied generously. Down the aisle there was a mother with her daughter and son, they were African American. The same lady who asked if she could help us seemed disgusted that they were in her way. She might have acted more dramatic to get her point across, but she definitely turned into a different person around

Tyson challenges not only the glory and aura of reminiscence surrounding the civil rights movement but also what is repeatedly regarded as its vital core – nonviolence. Enticed by a flawed justice system supporting racial oppression, designated a call to battle, the nonviolent leaders of the Congress of Racial Equality, Urban League, Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and Southern Christian Leadership Conference chose to wield the weight of the masses as their chief weapon. Churches also contributed their multitudes as one of the few organizations dominated by blacks, capable of

Chicago in the 1920s was a turning point for the development of ethnic neighborhoods. After the opening of the first rail connection from New York to Chicago in the 1840s, immigration sky rocketed from that point on. Majority of the immigrants to Chicago were Europeans. The Irish, Italians, eastern European Jews, Germans, and Mexicans were among the most common ethnicities to reside in Chicago. These groups made up the greater part of Chicago. The sudden increase in immigration to Chicago in the 1920s soon led to an even further distinguished separation of ethnicities in neighborhoods. The overall development of these neighborhoods deeply impacted how Chicago is sectioned off nowadays. Without these ethnicities immigrating to Chicago

African Americans had little opportunity to better themselves economically. Some laws prohibited them from teaching and from entering certain other businesses and professions. Large numbers of blacks had to take low-paying jobs as farm hands or as servants for white employers. Many others were forced to become sharecroppers or tenant framers. They rented small plots of land and paid the rent with money earned from the crops. Struggling to survive, many ran up huge debts to their white landlords or the town merchants. Fortunately, there were rays of sunshine forcing their way through this cloudy time.

Racial segregation has had a long history in Chicago. While separation by nationality had always been apparent in the city, with neighborhoods typically being dominated by a certain ethnicity, no group of Chicagoans experienced the degree of segregation that African Americans faced in everything from the housing districts to public services. Forced to live only in designated areas by de facto segregation, redlining, and other tactics, they had limited chances to escape the cycle of danger and discrimination of the city. Confined to only their deteriorating neighborhoods,they had little chance.

I grew up in a small town back east called Pennsville, population 15,000, and all of them were white folks except the Lees and the Tacketts. They were the only two colored families (as they were known to be called in passing), that lived in town. How they

Following the 1964 Civil Rights Act, president Lyndon Johnson put in place important steps in Affirmative Action policies on June 4, 1965. When speaking about Affirmative Action president Johnson said... “you do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and say, you are free to compete with the others, and still justly believe that you have been completely fair.” Implying that the act of not taking action would only freeze the brutality that has been aimed at blacks for years. This metaphor was one of many thoughts original to the late, great Martin Luther King Jr. King thought the best response to stop discrimination, would be

while people of color resided and continued to reside in cities. During the early 80’s as a