Michelangelo Antonioni made the film, Blow-Up, in 1967. Thomas as the protagonist of the movie is an independent and gifted young fashion photographer in London. One day, he wanders into a park and witnesses a private moment between a woman and a middle-aged man. When he takes the pictures secretly as a voyeur, the woman notices him and desperately demands him to return the film. Her panic and anxiety drives Thomas to examine the rolls of films. Then he blows up some of the picture to poster size in his studio. For a while, Thomas believes that he interrupts a plot and sees the gunman hidden among the trees. When he returns the park to confirm his speculation at night, the corpse is posed perfectly straight on the ground. However, when he returns …show more content…
His camera turns into the only medium for him to observe the world. His images illustrate his subjective impression of the city. In the beginning of the movie, when he drives back from a doss house, where Thomas disguises himself in order to take some pictures for his book, his late arrival causes discontent from his model, Veruschka, who has been waited for the shooting around an hour. As the dominant role of the studio, Thomas does not pay attention to her complains completely. The first clip starts from 8:11 to 8:40, depicting the moment of Thomas taking pictures for Veruschka with intimate interactions and patient instructions. In the first shot, the camera begins with a medium close-up from a slightly high angle. Veruschka frequently changes her poses in accord with a dynamic jazz song on the soundtrack. As Thomas moves to the left side, Antonioni tilts his camera up to right above the characters, observing the subtle tension between Thomas and Veruschka from God’s perspective. Thomas’s phallic camera is in command of Veruschka’s skinny and vulnerable body from a dominant and controlling perspective. On the contrary, Veruschka is identified as the passive object of desire and male gaze. Then, the camera cuts to another slightly low perspective with a medium close-up, in which showing the back of Thomas. He tries to capture the facial expression of his model. In the next two shots, the director employs jump cuts that violating the 180 degrees rule accentuating the intense rhythm in the studio. Thomas patiently instructs the model to perform in order to produce great photos, even though he needs to kiss her. On the other hand, Veruschka engages actively with Thomas and his camera with a contented
The directors chosen camera technique, a simple two composition that progresses the scene a steady pace, forces the audience to feel a part of the awkward exchange; obviously, a quality of film that could not be as profoundly achieved through the narrative in the novel.
topic C. in “imagining the reservation,” Alexie says “Survival = Anger x Imagination.” Using “The Trial of Thomas Builds-the-Fire,” show how this formula works in the life of Thomas. How has he used his anger and his imagination to survive?
“We know it’s a new year. Everybody 0-0. The main thing is you win or you go home,”
To see what they see, and compare our own thoughts with the evolution of the characters and the story. The dexterity of the images, and the impact that each scene has in portraying this theme, guide the viewer throughout the film with little use of dialogue and action. Our central character “Jeff,” is struggling with his casted imprisonment, his need for adventure is apparent as he watches outside his window. Conflicted with his girlfriend and conflicted with his theories, his character becomes more palpable, we begin to realize what is going on not only on the outside of him, but the inside of him as well. The aspects of the outside courtyard and the visual isolation of each apartment, help depict the humanity of each individual and sympathy for even the darkest characters. Hitchcock uses his camera, just as our protagonist does, to focus with him. The camera angles are depicted in a way to which we react with the character, rather than at the character, and eventually expose the minor elements of the story that bring to fruition the suspense of the movie and the thrills of discovery.
In the opening scene of the film ‘Gattaca’, camera work and the power of setting engrosses the audience and institutes conflicts. Close ups and wide shots are most frequent for camera work while colours and organisation represent setting.
In addition to camera movements, he uses camera distances and framing to create images that make the audience feel cheerful. When he frames a shot, if it takes place outside, there is ample amount of bountiful nature within the frame. The most prominent example of this is toward the end of the film when the narrator is describing the after effects of the massive storm. It is a medium close up but the narrator is only in a small portion of the frame, the rest if a
The long take begins with an alarm clock waking up a couple, sleeping out on their balcony. As the camera moves from window to window around the courtyard, we see a few brief snippets of characters’ lives. And finally, the audience sees inside the apartment that has been its point of view all along. Mise-en-scene, framing, and cinematography
Through the use of high and low angles (“a shot that is made by placing the camera above the subject angled downward” and “a shot made by placing the camera below the subject angled upward” respectfully defined by Jon Lewis, author of The Essential Cinema), are almost balanced in this scene. (Lewis) For example, during the first part of the scene, Mrs. Kane, Susan Alexander, and Mr. Gettys are seen as closer to the camera and at a low angle. This could possibly demonstrate that they are more active in the scene than Mr. Kane. Meanwhile, it appears that Mr. Kane is shorter and smaller than the other characters, again hinting at his inability to control the situation.
Furthermore, Vant Sant makes statements which are just as strong through his use of camera angles and shots. Together with the film’s cinematographer, Jean-Yves Escoffier, he creates a mise-en-scene which is striking and powerful
The director mainly used eye level shots, to leave it up to the audience to judge the two main characters of the movie, although certain power struggles in the film are shown from high angles to illustrate someone dominating a conversation or argument. Figgis also uses some point of view shots to show the imbalance during Ben’s drunken periods where the camera is placed at an oblique angle to show tension and approaching movements. The images in the film are in high contrast with streaks of blackness and harsh shafts of light to underline the dramatic events that occur.
Everything in the frame is in focus, which in a cinema viewing is a lot to take in, especially considering the films aspect ratio of 1.85:1. However, the audiences’ eyes are cleverly guided around the frame by almost unnaturally loud sounds, some of which are accentuated in post-production by Tati. The sounds against the floors create a reverbing echo, highlighting the absurd impracticality of the building. A man and a woman sit in the bottom left hand corner of the frame in what appears to be a waiting area. They are dressed identically in their monotonous grey colours, as if they are enslaved to the colours surrounding them. During the shot’s beginning, the audience is drawn to the nuns and their rhythmic footsteps as they enter the frame. Then, through a combination of actor gestures and dialogue, this gaze shifts to the two characters anchored in the foreground of the image. The rattling of a table being wheeled out by a man in white into the frame moves our eyes, as well as the couples own attention, to
Driven by the same communistic idea, Dziga Vertov presents another, all different way of his propaganda style. His vision applies to the beauty of the regular daily life and he starts experimenting with to demonstrate the objective eye of the movie camera of recording and showing the un-staged events that are not noticed by the bared human eye. His movement Cine-Eye distinguishes his position from the idea of the
Camera shots and angles are also used by Ross as a cinematic technique. The lack of engagement in class of a close up of David’s face is an example. David’s face show the expression of boredom and tiredness, as he listens to the teacher talk. Another example of a camera technique is the close up of David asking out a girl. It shows the strength and courage David has in him, but a long shot shows us that the girl is hundreds of meters away. This conveys that David is too socially inept to
The director uses multiple camera shots to highlight the love during troublesome times and the emotions that are present. A wide shot is used when the audience watches Guido marching in front of the soldier shortly before his death. Guido does this as he is aware that his son is watching and still wants the experience of the camp to be a fun game and does not want Giosue to be afraid of what is happening. Close up shots are commonly used throughout the film to give more detail into the emotions that the characters are feeling. A
The signs of the time are also shown through the use of specific camera shots, which humble the characters and show their frailty. Long Shots, in particular, are used to exemplify the smallness of the characters (without power) in the vastness of the world around them. In the scene in which the