Blue Jay Processing Case Summary

Exceptional Child Center alleged that by failing to alter the reimbursement rates for the in home care, the Idaho’s department of health violated the state Equal access provision. The district court decided that in order to satisfy the requirement of the equal access provision, the state must take into account the costs of care when setting reimbursement rates. After the plaintiff filed a complaint, the Idaho district court granted summary judgement in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the department of Health and

In order to run a childcare service there is a need to retain a large amount of information on each child.

In different city and states they offer emergency assistance for bills and also advocating and case management services. The programs are created to both improve the immediate person and family needs. To name a few of the services provided by the program includes emergency rental assistance with Security Deposit emergency, utility bill assistance which includes gas, water, and electric and emergency food aid.

from the state, leading to revision of the state agency policies and regulations and also the initiation of the new program to create extra support for child welfare.

I also wanted to remind you of the main purpose of the program. The early intervention program was developed to inform and educate new customers with important program information so that they leave the agency understanding what they can expect next following their child support hearing.

So García and four others came to the Supreme Court case hearing: Chris Alderete and James de Anda of the American G.I. Forum and John J. Herrera and Carlos Cadena from the League of United Latin American Citizens. The Supreme Court heard the Hernández V. The State of Texas case in 1954. There was two sides for this case, Hernández’ and The State of Texas. García fought for Hernández and argued that the 14th amendment not only protected the rights of races like white and black but also class. He said that those citizens in the jury selection process were being discrediting and excluding people based on class and that’s why there hasn’t been a Mexican-American citizen on a Texas jury in over 25 years. This affected all the minorities and lower classes especially Mexican-Americans and made it unfair to them in court cases. On the other hand The State of Texas said that the 14th amendment only protected the rights of whites and blacks and that Mexican-Americans fall under the white class. Furthermore, The State of Texas verified that no Mexican-American had served on the jury in over 25 years but proposed that it was just a coincidence and not because of discrimination. I believe The State of Texas was worried about having minorities and separate classes in juries because they might not make the same decisions that the average white man would make. Thus Texas was hesitant to promote the electing of any Mexican-American to a jury

In a long time since its initiation, Head Start has enhanced the lives of more than 32 million youngsters and their families. Notwithstanding life and school readiness, Head Start is likewise the country's research center for early learning development. Head Start offers an exceptional children and family program configuration combined with a conveyance framework that incorporates nearby projects, national models, observing, proficient improvement, and family interactions. This has been the reason for some resulting statewide and group

With adoption assistance, in 2006 The Safe and Timely Placement of Foster Children Act was enacted to improve the protection of children, while holding states at fault if placement is not contributed within a timely manner. This act increased the state's caseworkers visits for children in out of state Foster Care placements (Children's Bureaus). The definition of case review system was then modified with requirement of child health and education records be released to either the individual providing care to the foster child or also to a foster child being terminated from foster care with no charge (Children's Bureaus). Promoting

Head Start and Early Head Start are categorically eligible for free meals. Pre-K children are classified into appropriate pay categories; free, reduced and paid. Pre-K pays for the cost of meals for children in the reduced and paid categories. All children that are eligible and enrolled are automatically eligible for CACFP. All Income eligibility information is kept in the child’s file and entered into the PROMIS system. Income Eligibility Applications for Pre-K children are to be obtained by center staff (i.e., Center Directors, teachers, or specialists) from parents upon enrollment but no later than ten days from starting. Income Eligibility Applications are turned into the Nutrition Manager immediately upon receipt. The original Income Eligibility Application is kept on file in the Nutrition Manager’s office with a copy kept in the child’s file. The Nutrition Manager and Assistant prints monthly reports indicating each child’s identifying information, income and number in household. These printouts are matched against meal count information double checking enrollment status. All documentation is kept on file in the Nutrition Manager’s

The court system has a major impact on Indigenous people and Indigenous law. Indigenous law is controlled by the rulings of the government and sets an example of government’s the priority and interest of Indigenous issues. This case resulted in major conflict between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in Canada. Racial tension within Canada grew and it drew a line between Indigenous people and European people as well as the court. Colton Boushie’s case is an example of how society reacts to the court and racism within Canada.

The passing of The Child and Family Service Improvement and Innovation Act, H.R. 2883, was essentially put into place to counteract some of the dangers of the foster care system. It Put in place more required regulations of case workers, but perhaps also played the unfortunate role in the increased burnout of those within the field of child and family services. Regardless of this potential repercussion, the bill holds true intentions to make the system not only function better, but improve the care and quality of child and family services. Put into federal law September 24, 2011, it has been working towards progress and improvements within the system (H.R. 2883 (112th): Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act, 2011).

a transition of care physically and by insurance authorization. The new foster mother now wishes to continue

Each child who is receiving services will have a documented Family Services Plan (FSP) started within 60 days of an assessment having been opened. The plan will stress

review and that the court approved the plan to maintain placement with parent. Additionally, the service recommend by the judge to the mother are

The licensing unit addresses facilities across the state of West Virginia. Also, due to children being placed out of state, workers travel out of state to those facilities to ensure they are in compliance with West Virginia laws. The one thing that congregant care placements lack is addressing the individual needs of each child. Also, employees at the facilities are often neglectful, and use forceful tactics to deal with children’s behaviors. This is not effective practice and diminishes the system’s theory approach