Boaters Inc. Vs. City Government: Case Study

What principles would you need to be aware of when dealing with the ethical dilemmas in this case study?

(TCO 1, 2, 3, 4) Identify the seven basic principles put forth in the American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics. Choose three of these principles, and anticipate how a researcher might encounter controversy by abiding by these principles

This chapter will discuss and outline the case study and the ethical consideration of the research. Research is a mutual undertaking between researchers and participants and therefore, must be handled with trust and fairmindedness. This is to “avoid harm to participants, ensure informed consent of participants, respect the privacy of participants and to avoid the use of deception” (Gray, 2011, p.73). Furthermore, consent must be given without coercion, meaning that participants fully understand the actions of the research and how the results will be used, Burns (2000).

Thirdly, there are various ethical standards that were utilized as a part of concocting crime rate information in Minnesota. With legitimate referencing, I figured out how to incorporate the correct outline, secrecy tenets for the companion audits, information offering rules, licensing, and origin and copyright strategies, to secure the protected innovation engages. I have additionally shown that future coordinated efforts are fundamental for upgrading ethical research.

A number of key terms describe the system of ethical considerations that the modern research establishments have set up to protect the rights of research subjects. Voluntary participation and confidentiality are principles that demands that the respondents to be free from coercion in any way when participating in the research, protected in the raw data, and published

(TCO 1, 2, 3, 4) Identify the seven basic principles put forth in the American Sociological Association’s Code of Ethics. Choose three of these principles, and anticipate how a researcher might encounter controversy by abiding by these principles

However in this case, there exists a standardized and published code of ethics created by the ICMA to provide consistency and uniformity with regard to professional local government management. In an evolving and contradictory political climate such as that which existed in the town of Dover, the principles expressed in this code of ethics serve as a fair and objective guideline by which difficult decisions can be based on. Therefore, there should generally not be circumstances where ethical considerations are sacrificed on the basis of a given individual or group’s perception of the best possible outcome for the community. Much like a constitution, the ICMA Code of Ethics gives decision makers a tangible reference and provides a scale of ethical justice on which conflicting opinions can be weighed against each other.

One ethical principle is that of respect for persons who are involved in the research. According to the Belmont Report (1979) this principle should honor a person and their autonomous choices, however, the report observes that not all individuals are “capable of self-determination” (sec. Part B 1. Respect for Persons). This incapability requires that those persons be protected (Belmont Report, 1979). Wertheimer (2011) corroborates this in stating that group soft-paternalism is implicit that research should not capitalize on or abuse vulnerable populations, or those population groups who are not able to make rational self-determination. The presence of group soft-paternalism by Wertheimer (2011) in exploiting vulnerable groups also supports the Belmont Report (1979) ethical principle of justice. This principle ensures that persons selected for research are not merely being selected based on their vulnerability (Belmont Report, 1979, sec. Part B 3.

Examine the impact of research that has been conducted in the United States that violated the rights of subjects or involved ethical misconduct. What were the effects on the study participants?  What changes have been made related to current guidelines for research as a direct result of this misconduct?

There are three basic principles to consider when evaluating the ethics of a study: 1) respect for persons, 2) beneficence, and 3) justice (Houser, J., 2012, pg. 54-56). To apply these

Identification of any ethical issues that arose during the information gathering and how they were resolved

The statute of limitations does not continue to run for a counterclaim after a plaintiff’s complaint. In Atl. City Hosp. v. Finkle, 110 N.J. Super. 435 (Cnty. Ct. 1970), the court held a counterclaim filed more than two years after the claim arose was not barred by the statute of limitations since the plaintiff had initiated the principal action within the time limit. In that case, the plaintiff hospital filed for summary judgment on the defendant’s counterclaim for damages from breach of warranty, stemming from an original complaint of the plaintiff requesting payment for unpaid hospital bills. Id. at 437. In their analysis, the court stated that there was lack of precedent on the issues in the state of New Jersey. Id. at 438. The court further

Bart J. Van Dissel and Joshua D. Margolis’s Martha McCaskey, is a case study about Martha McCaskey, a young, inexperienced graduate in her first full-time job facing an ethical dilemma. McCaskey has to make decisions between promotion from successfully completing a project but conflicting her ethics and professional integrity and alienation from losing 20% of the division’s total revenue and future businesses due to failure of completing the project. To further analyze the case and derives ideal solution, we should understand that McCaskey is not the only major stakeholders influenced by the event. Other major stakeholders and their problems have to be identified. By understanding goals, concerns a problems of each stakeholder, we could then conduct analyses of alternative solutions in order to derive recommended solutions for McCaskey.

Organization leaders have a responsibility for upholding the proper standards as they pertain to ethical behaviors in the workplace. Leaders are constantly faced with making the best decisions possible for their corporations and to increase profits for company stakeholders. Unfortunately, some stakeholders do not always make the right choices, especially when the wrong one choice is more enticing. My research will determine the stakeholders invested in PharmaCARE, analyze the ethics of their treatment of the indigenous population and its rank-and-file workers versus the executives, and determine whether Allen can legally fire a few of his employees. Also, determine

What were the ethical implications of the decisions taken at the time of the study?