Bobo Doll Experiment

The fundamentals of the social learning theory significantly describe offenders and their criminal behavior which is learned based on observation and imitation. A researcher by the name of Albert Bandura along with coworkers tested the social learning theory with several experiments on children and their imitation of aggression based on what they saw and were exposed to. Bandura’s focus was to prove that human behavior such as aggression is learned through social imitations and copying the actions of others. Walters (1966) gives details about the Bobo doll experiment and explains its purpose related to learning a violent behavior based on observation. In the experiment, the tested subjects were children of both sexes, ranging from the ages of three to six years. Some of the children were exposed to a non-aggressive adult, while the other children were placed in a room with an aggressive adult who would both physically and verbally attack the Bobo doll. The control group in the experiment was not exposed to any adult. During the second phase of the experiment, the children were left in a room by themselves with the toys, and watched to see if they would demonstrate the aggressive behavior like that of which they observed adults doing earlier. Walter (1966) describes the results as “children who had been exposed to an aggressive model showed more imitative physical and verbal

The room was also equipped with a one-way window so the child could be observed without their acknowledgement. The experiment showed that the consequences in the films that the children observed in the ending, created a different outcome. The children who witnessed the film were the adult was rewarded was most likely to repeat or imitate the aggressive behavior toward the Bobo doll. In the situation of the other children who watched the adult being punished for their aggressive behavior, the children were less likely to recreate the aggressive behavior towards the Bobo doll. After the findings Bandura added to the experiment. The children who watched any of the three films were asked to recreate what the adult did in the film. Each imitation the child recreated correctly, they were rewarded with candy and stickers. Virtually all the children were capable of recreating all actions, aggressive or non-aggressive. The different variations of the films the children watched had no impact on them. In conclusion to Bandura’s experiment, you are capable of imitating any behavior, aggressive or non-aggressive, but you are more likely to imitate if there is expectation of any type of reward.

The first stage of the experiment is called modeling. In this stage the children were individually shown into a room where they would sit in one corner and pay with potato prints and pictures and the adult sat in the other corner with a mallet and the Bobo doll. In the first group, 24 children would watch a male or female adult abuse the doll both physically (kicked, punched, threw, and hit with different objects) and verbally (made aggressive and non-aggressive statements). In the second group, 24 children were exposed to adult who played quietly in the corner with the toys but avoiding the Bobo doll. The third group, 24 children were not exposed to neither an aggressive or non-aggressive adult. After 10 minutes went by, the adult in both groups left the

I found Bobo experiment interesting since they cover the most types of validity. I have realized while watching the experiment, that boys were more aggressive than girls. In a way male except violence more than female. For instance, my husband can watch more horror and extremely violent movies than I do, and I prefer movies with less violence.

In Bandura 's Bobo doll study, children who observed an adult ignore the Bobo doll ________.

The Bobo doll experiment was the collective name of experiment conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961 and 1963 when children’s behaviors after watching a violence video. This experiment done in children. Albert Bandura made a video of children who used to more violence video. Instated out of 100% of people, 60% boys are more aggressive comparison to girls, because boys play more aggressive and dramatic games than a girl. According to the research, Albert found that both girls and boys who watched the older people, “how they play and beat the doll”. In our country we believe that, we learn from our siblings, if brother and sister are nice and good than small child also good. Children learn what they saw and lots of kids spend more quality time

The Bobo Doll experiment also demonstrated that incentives can affect performance (Holy & Perry, 2012). Incentives can encourage behaviors to continue or be discouraged. At this educator’s program, students who have misbehave loose the privilege of using their favorite toy. After the child repeatedly loses privileges for the same misconduct, the child begins to learn that behavior have a consequence. Many early childhood educators can see that, after the child has learned cause and effect, the child minimizes the behavior to avoid losing privileges. As Holy & Perry (2012) states, this might explain why not all adolescents get influenced by the media's smoking advertisements. Adolescents avoid "bad behavior" because they have personal consequences

In the doll studies, African American children ranging from ages three to seven years old were presented with a White and Black doll in front of them. Then, they were allowed to choose which doll they wanted

Albert Bandura’s Bobo the Doll Experiment was performed to solidify and add credence to his belief that all human behavior is learned through social imitation, rather than inherited through genetic influences. During the 1960s, many psychologists debated whether genetics or environmental factors, such as social learning, effected a child’s development. Bandura designed the Bobo Doll experiment to prove that children imitate behaviors set by role model’s. Bandura’s research hastened the evolution of the 20th century experimental psychology from pure behaviorism into what is now known as social cognitive learning (Artino, 2017).

In this experiment, children were first shown a video of an adult hitting, assaulting, punching and kicking the Bobo doll. Then they were brought into a room and left alone with nothing, no toys but a Bobo doll. Later, the children were seen to imitate the actions of the adult in the video, inflicting violence onto the doll. For observational learning to happen, there must be a motivation for people to perform the action. In this case, the children were left with no toys but the Bobo doll. Additionally, they must also observe the actions, retain the memory to be able to reproduce, imitate and repeat the actions carried out by the adult in the video.

In 1961, psychologist Albert Bandura came up with the Social Learning Theory which stated that children learn social behavior, such as aggression, and alter their own through the process of observational learning- observing someone else’s behavior. To test this theory, he created the Bobo Doll Experiment. During this test, three groups of 24 children were places in different rooms with different environments. In one room, 24 children were exposed to non-aggressive behavior towards a bobo doll. In the second room, the children were exposed to aggressive behavior towards the doll. The third room served as the control group; The 24 children in that room were simply taught to ignore the doll. The results showed that the children who witnessed the violent behavior quickly picked up on it and began to act the same towards the doll. Those 24 children made more immitative aggressive responses than those in the non-aggressive and control groups (McLeod 2011). This famous experiement credits many psychologists who believe genetics has nothing to do with criminal

In the Bobo Doll Experiment conducted by Bandura in 1961, researchers wanted to know if social behaviors could be learned by observation. The experiment mainly consisted on showing, to a certain number of kids, a video that included violence. By doing this, they could later conclude how children learn aggression through observation. They took 36 girls and 36 boys and randomly assigned them into groups. The participants were from 3 to 6 years old. It is important to point out that the researchers did some testing to the participants before performing the experiment. They observed how aggressive the participants were before the experiment took place to have information on their daily behavior. The procedure consists of having three different groups: one called aggressive model, another called non-aggressive model and another one called control condition.

The purpose of Albert Bandura experiment was to study the children’s behavior or aggressiveness toward the Bobo doll, after observing an adult being aggressive toward the doll themselves. This experiment is now known as The Bobo Experiment. According to the Association for Psychological Science, Albert Bandura conducted this Bobo doll experiment with children as young as three years old and as old as 6 years old. Bandura used a female role model and the subjects were divided into three groups. The first group was exposed to the aggressive role model and the second group was exposed to their non-aggressive role model. And the third group was not exposed to aggression at all. (Association for

Albert Bandura was born in Canada on December 4th, 1925 and he was known for pioneering the research on how environmental variable influences how people relate to each other. His Social Cognitive Theory pioneered learned behavior (Pajares, 2001)

In the Bobo Doll experiment conducted by Albert Bandura, researchers were interested in testing children’s behavior in response to their exposure to violence. This study was constructed with 72 children, 36 boys and 36 girls from Stanford University Nursery School. Before the study began, each child was individually scored on his or her level of aggression towards others, as rated by the experimenter and the child’s teacher. Then the children were separated into groups based on a similar score of aggression. The children were separated into three groups of 24 children. The three groups allowed the experimenter to create the conditions used to test the children’s response to violence, which was the independent variable, as it affects the children’s aggressive behavior, the dependent variable. The first group of subjects was the aggressive model group, where the subjects were presented in a