Bodily-Kinesthetic Argument Analysis

The Mind-Body Problem is the debate on how both the mind and the body interract with eachother, and how they are connected. The mind is all about mental processes, thought, and consciousness. The body is about the physical aspects of the brain and the brain’s neurons, and how the brain is structured. Many of the questions asked about this problem are along the lines of; is the mind apart of the body or is the body apart of the mind? In this essay I will be explaining the arguments, counterarguments, and responses this particular problem.

The Mind-Body Problem is one with many different opposing viewpoints and standpoints that has baffled the minds of many that question their existence in the physical realm. Many would argue that the mind is separate from the body which sounds quite poetic nature, but with all emotional feelings aside what would be the actual scientific, cynical some could argue, way of actually addressing the Mind-Body Problem? Since there is very limited evidence that people can observe physically then it is apparent that the idea of Dualism is quite outlandish. Typically, when an argument accounts for unobservable facts and rather theoretical

I passed two different tests and got almost the exact same results. The first test shows me that I have four clearly expressed intelligences: Kinesthetic, Logical, Intrapersonal and Visual/Spatial. The second test gave me three top intelligences: Kinesthetic, Logical and Intrapersonal. I can say that all results correspond to reality. It is true that I love sports. I play tennis around 11 years. Also, I like math because of it I chose accounting discipline. In addition, it is completely true that I am an intrapersonal. Using these results I may think about my future career. However, I already have chosen one and it is correct decision this test proved my thoughts. Also, Kinesthetic intelligence provides me a chance to go in for sport. Logical intelligence supports my decision to be an accountant or an economist. However Intrapersonal intelligence shows me that I may reach successes working as CEO, an entrepreneur or even a psychologist.

I choose to take the Multiple Intelligences Self-Assessment quiz. When I taught preschool and as the trainer for my department I have learned that there are many different methods in which people learn. I have learned to adapt how I teach and train based on what is required by the learner. Due to this I was curious to determine the variety of learning methods that work best for me. I discovered that I have a broad range of ways in which I learn best. I have always excelled at learning and find that I learn fairly quickly, so this is not surprising to me. What did surprise me was that my highest percentage was naturalistic. One question that I often ask is, “Why?” I enjoy having a knowledge of how things work and the ability to understand a variety of subjects, but did not realize how highly it impacted my learning. The few categories where I scored low were music and body kinesthetic. Neither of these surprise me much. When I work and am trying to concentrate I find that music and movement is very distracting. I have learned to eliminate them when focus and concentration is crucial. The rest of the categories I scored from 49% to 63%. I feel this explains my ability to learn a broad spectrum of things quickly no matter what the method of learning is. The two areas where I scored the highest were interpersonal and intrapersonal. This explains my drive for success, ability to gain insight into a variety of situations and people, my solid foundation in who I am and what

Intelligence tests are inaccurate to measures true ability of a person because genes affect how a person responds to their surroundings, the tests cannot measure the person biological makeup or his true potential for being “smart”.

Chapter 4, reading 14, titled Just How Are You Intelligent?, focused on the researchers theory of multiple intelligences (MI Theory). The researcher believed that parts of the brain specialized in different functions and that different parts have different intelligences. In order to help prove this theory, the researcher came up with eight indicators that helped him see if an intelligence was actually real. The researcher proposed seven different intelligences that passed most or all of the eight criteria. These included linguistic (words), musical (sounds), logical-mathematical (example: numbers), spatial (visualization, transformation, rotation), bodily kinesthetic (physical control), intrapersonal (understanding yourself), and interpersonal

On the Ethics IQ Quiz, I scored a 3 out of 5 points. I do not totally agree with the score I was given for many reasons. The first reason why I do not agree with the score I received is, I believe some of the answers could have had more than one answer. I questions this quiz because I do not feel like those type of questions can determine what your IQ score is.

The purpose of the assessment was to see how I not only scored, but showed in what areas how I think and feel towards certain areas. In the Locus of Control assessment I scored a seven. The result indicate that a high score indicates an external locus of control while a low score indicates an internal locus of control. This test was performed to see how I believe I can control certain events affecting me. While the Multiple Intelligence showed the different learning and development of learning process of each stage. Therefore, the concrete experience gave me a sense of feeling that I am exactly who I am. Meaning the results showed that I care about other’s feelings and learn through different experiences. One statement mention how I often prefer

On the emotional intelligence quiz, I received a 70 out of 100. I learned that in most situations, I’m the calm one, who is usually trying to talk sense into someone else. For example the question about the angry customer on the phone, I choose the answer about talk to him, and offering him options that could help with his problem. I learned that I’m a problem solver, which I would have never have pictured myself as being. I think of myself more as a listener, than a problem solver. It does make sense though since being a problem solver and listener do go together. You have to listen to someone to help them solve their problems. I know that people will come to me, if they have problems with anything. So I’m a lot more savvy than I thought I

My thoughts are that both the Locus of Control and the Multiple Intelligence assessments gave me pretty accurate results. I believe the results of both assessments were on point about my locus of control and intelligence strengths.

This survey resulted that I was a good active listener and a good writer. Having both of these skills is excellent for writing accurately while listening and doing it all in a timely manner. Two other things I scored higher in were Mathematics and Critical Thinking. I assumed that I would get a higher score in these because I can solve grade-average Mathematical equations without thinking much about the actual problem’s process. I love to analyze little things I do on a daily basis. This survey showed me the skills I scored lower in as well. I knew I wasn’t such a good speaker, but I also found that I wasn’t a very good

I found the multiple intelligence inventory the most useful because it helped me figure out which intelligences are my strongest. I find some of the activities and tasks I do easy, while others are tough.I have learned what my strongest multiple intelligence are through the inventory and I have realized that I can take advantage of them and use it to help me in different situations. For example, before I had taken the test I had noticed that I am very good at teamwork and that I work better when listening to music. By doing this inventory I have realized that it might be because my strongest multiple intelligence is interpersonal, musical and logical. After recognizing musical as one of my strongest intelligence I have tried to associate information

The Multiple Intelligences assessment has also reassured me that I am a logical and mathematical person. This assessment has also shown me that I have a good

In all honesty, I wasn't very surprised by my results. In the past I've taken similar tests and have come upon similar results and additionally have seen these qualities through introspective assessment. While there was several categories in the results, I have decided to simply explore three of my highest scores.

The theory of multiple intelligences was developed by Dr. Howard Gardner in 1983. The Theory of Multiple Intelligences is a critique of the standard psychological view of intellect: there is a single intelligence, adequately measured by IQ or other short answer tests. Instead, on the basis of evidence from disparate sources, the theory claims that human beings have a number of relatively discrete intellectual capacities. IQ tests assess linguistic and logical-mathematical intelligence, and sometimes spatial intelligence; they are a reasonably good predictor of who will do well in school. This is because humans have several other significant intellectual capacities (Harvard University).