Pollock points out that “The nation has seemingly become enamored with the idea of all police officers wearing body cameras that would record every interaction with the citizen” (pp. 211, 2017). The ability of body cameras to provide an unbiased account of interactions is an invaluable asset when trying to reconstruct a truthful, chronological interpretation of events. The camera never lies and provides evidence for a case provided from the point-of-view officers involved. As with every topic, several pros and cons are involved with the use of body cameras by law enforcement. The main supporting belief behind body cameras is that “equipping police with body cameras may be an effective way to improve the behavior of officers and the public …show more content…
“There are the initial camera costs, with each camera running about $1,000… The New Orleans Police Department, according to the article, plans to pay $1.2 million for body-cameras, with much of the cost going toward storage” (Kotowski, 2016). The larger amount of video produced by every officer adds up to an incredible amount of data for a department to then store securely. Additionally, video quality comes into account when cameras “can shoot in either 720p or 1080p resolution. If shot in 1080p, about twice as much data is being stored in the system” (Kotowski, 2016). Storage alone leads to incredibly high cost for large departments and which are simply unjustifiable with smaller department’s budgets in need of other necessary equipment. Also, an article by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claim the negative aspects of body cameras are “their potential to invade privacy, their risk of being reduced to just another tool for government mass surveillance, … and their risk of becoming a propaganda tool if the police control what footage the public is allowed to see” (Marlow & Stanley, 2017). The ACLU additionally expresses concern for the use of facial recognition technology in conjunction with body cameras. While such technology could provide an increased efficiency in identifying criminals and compiling separate occasions of …show more content…
However, for the intended purpose of this discussion, according to the most recent studies they would not be a solution to police abuse of authority. Unfortunately, it is an idea that sounds like perfect response on paper but is not supported by statistics after implementation. While the original smaller case studies supported the concept, a researcher on the largest study to date on the subject claims “We found essentially that we could not detect any statistically significant effect of the body-worn cameras” (Durkheimer, 2017). With the newest study arriving at an unexpected conclusion, the cost does not justify the use for a majority of departments. Privacy concerns, like supported by the ACLU and Brennan Center for Justice, can be disputed by acknowledging that any instance that requires interaction with police cannot be considered private. Police interactions are either in the form of direct response for intervention or in the form of as a community caretaker, in both roles privacy cannot be expected. Especially when accounting for the rise in use of cellphone videos, no one can have a reasonable expectation of anonymity or privacy in public. Furthermore, an officer would not have before-hand knowledge of what should be recorded or not. Thus, body cameras that are only activated when necessary due
Across the country a growing number of legislative departments have been debating about the pros and cons of police body cameras. This paper will further explore benefits, as well as the downfalls of using such devices. This paper will also look at specific cases and examine whether or not body cameras were helpful in various situations. It will examine if they were a deterrent in cases dealing with police brutality and domestic violence. It also looks at how they could be misused and assisting some officers in covering up their corrupt behavior.
Within recent years there has been much controversy surrounding police officers and whether or not they should be wearing body cameras to document their everyday interactions with the public. While the use of body cameras may seem to invade the public or police privacy. Police-worn body cameras will be beneficial to law enforcement and civilians all over the world. Police must be equipped with body cameras to alleviate any doubt in the effectiveness of officers. Law enforcement worn body cameras would enhance the trust of the public by keeping both the officers and the citizens accountable for their actions, providing evidence, and helping protect them from false accusations, while protecting privacy
Moreover, to stop the crime and police brutality, body cameras would not be a bad idea if they were to be taken a step forward. Nancy La Vigne writer of “Body Cameras for Police Could Be One Smart Step” talks about supervisors monitoring the cameras in case an altercation were to happen (6). Nancy also talks about body cameras invading constitutional rights of the citizens. Vigne writes, “Body cameras will capture not just an officers actions, but also those of the citizens with whom they interact – or even individuals walking by or in the background” (Vigne). Nancy’s point is that with the body cameras and civilians being recorded, should the citizens know they are being recorded. Another solution for the body cameras to be able to work would be for the cops to have no access to the cameras.
The body camera has become a popular choice amongst police departments worldwide. The situation of the scenario, and if the officer or suspect acted in the right can be determined from past footage. The cause of the body camera has been the allegations against officers for how they acted in certain situations, as well as for how the suspect acted during the callout. The effect has been officers being terminated due to lack of integrity or situational awareness, as well as officer safety. Suspects have also been convicted of false accusations against a police officer, as well as crimes presented in court, from fights, to officer involved shootings. The body worn camera has benefited both police officers and the general public.
The dispute of police body cameras truly hit the media hard this week. Blasting from the headlines all citizens were aware that Michael Brown was lethally shot in Ferguson, Missouri. This prompted officers to become fortified with body cameras. This technologically progressive world that we live in today has shaped a world of tweeting, posting and uploading. It’s about time that police departments take advantage of the tools accessible to them, especially with the advancement of equipment. The move forward in technology will help to alleviate speculation on any misconduct perpetrated. There now will be hard honest evidence of any crime committed against a police officer.
With so many incidents occurring between law enforcement and civilians, it’s about time we have our officers wear body cameras. Law enforcement wants to use body cameras, many politicians are in favor for them, Civil-rights groups are advocating them, and communities that already have a strong police presence in their neighborhoods are requesting that the police get cameras now. With the uproar of law enforcement and the death of many black American’s, body cameras can be very useful. There is always that missing link when trying to put these horrible moments back together. Far too many times we end up with the suspect dead and only get one side of the story. With the use of body cameras, we can now get more insight on the events that happen (Boyd, 2015).
In my opinion the body cam is a genius idea because it will limit the amount of excessive force claims and hold the officer to a higher standard. Cameras also will hold the suspect accountable, showing the whole story. Body cameras are geared toward showing the whole report apposed to a 30 second cell phone video claiming they are wrongfully detained/arrested. Now with this technology people will see the whole confrontation from the beginning to the end. We are all humans a make mistakes, but this will also help identify if an act of force was justifiable or not and if the actions taken fit the result. I don't think it will lower crime but it will set things straight if the police are called. I like how the retired officer said, "This all has
In today’s society no one is safe from everyday peril. Situations arise daily that may present either a law enforcement official or civilian that could warrant the need for extra protection. In some cases it is a matter of he said, she said. For those faced with such situations, documentation that could be provided by body cameras worn by police officials could be of great use. Body cameras have been tested in a small group of police departments and have provided an overwhelming positive effect. Police officers wearing body cameras not only provide the officers with extra peace o mind but give civilians documentation to back up their sides of the story. Not everyone is in favor of police
The intention of my paper is not to conclude that all police officers are bigoted and require constant supervision to do their jobs. Unfortunately, we live in a society where racism is still prominent, and sometimes unintentional, therefore we must take necessary action to prevent any unfair treatment based on race/appearance. I want to use my proposal as a way to prove the necessity of body cameras, ultimately demonstrating they are beneficial to everyone regardless of your personal or political beliefs. Through the sources I have found, the general consensus is the idea of police wearing body cameras is highly supported. Although the theory is widely accepted, some of my evidence will be
Body cameras can hold police officers accountable for their actions, both the good and the bad. “Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate, and inappropriate, conduct” (Buam). Also when the citizens make accusations they could pull the video from the camera and see whether the police officer did what they said they did or not. “Video recorded by body cams protect any false accusations, misconduct, or abuse
Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give
Every year millions of people wait and wait for march to come around just for college basketball. Trying to make the perfect bracket to win some money against their friends, and of course the right to gloat about having a bracket. During march you can’t watch one television show without seeing a commercial with a college basketball player on it. Everyone playing as well as everyone watching is filled with excitement and anticipation to see who will be crowned the next national champion. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in America, and they do it all for free just for the fans entertainment. Most Division I athletes are given a full scholarship for the sport that they are playing, but that doesn 't give them money for living expenses such as groceries, food off campus, clothing, or even a night out on the weekends. College athletes should be given a certain salary for the semester, not only will it teach them managing money but also give them the money that they have earned for their job like extra curricular activity. Most athletes come from low income households where there families depend on them to contribute significantly. With how busy they become as college athletes they can barely find time to fit all of there studies in let alone get a part time job.
Since then, several states across the U.S., including Washington State, have begun requiring their police officers to wear body cameras in hopes of improving officer morale, providing more concrete evidence and improving police training. However, there are still many issues concerning the daily use of body-worn cameras that the people and governing organizations are slow to address. The distribution of body cameras has simply been too quick and needs further testing, clear policy limitations and proposals, and extended contemplation on all the possible effects or consequences before they become standard use. In an article published by the Harvard Law Review Association, they noted that “widespread galvanization over body cameras exemplifies the human tendency, in times of tragedy, to latch on to the most readily available solution to a complex problem.”
Throughout the Dark Romantic period, many forms of new writing were formed. This included the beginnings of Dark Romantic and Transcendentalist movements. While different than the Dark Romantics, the Transcendentalists believed in many of the same values, including the value of spirit over emotions and feelings over intelligence. The Transcendentalists explored how the beauty of nature benefited the human soul and mind. In addition, the Transcendentalists investigated the positive effects of nature’s grace and peace on psychology and the ensuing behaviors. By contrast, The Dark Romantics explored the conflict of good and evil and the effects of guilt on the human mind. In the many works of Dark Romantic literature, dark themes emerge
Much interest in the technology of the body cameras comes from a growing problem that the United States has been having a major problem with police violence. Though some might argue that the wearing of body cameras violate privacy, in fact the use of the cameras will minimize violence, show accountability, and a human side of policing. These body cameras would help serve by providing video evidence that can be referenced and use anytime allegations are made against police officers and criminals alike. The use of these body cameras are somewhat in the evaluation and study stages, but they are quickly becoming the standard in some police departments across the United States. These cameras would not only serve to provide video evidence, but it provide accountability. The ideal policy for the cams is that they stay on and continue recording throughout police officers shifts, which would help eliminate any possibility of doing something that would not be used as evidence later on and help them evade the recording of abuse committed while on duty.