preview

Body Cameras Pros And Cons

Decent Essays

Pollock points out that “The nation has seemingly become enamored with the idea of all police officers wearing body cameras that would record every interaction with the citizen” (pp. 211, 2017). The ability of body cameras to provide an unbiased account of interactions is an invaluable asset when trying to reconstruct a truthful, chronological interpretation of events. The camera never lies and provides evidence for a case provided from the point-of-view officers involved. As with every topic, several pros and cons are involved with the use of body cameras by law enforcement. The main supporting belief behind body cameras is that “equipping police with body cameras may be an effective way to improve the behavior of officers and the public …show more content…

“There are the initial camera costs, with each camera running about $1,000… The New Orleans Police Department, according to the article, plans to pay $1.2 million for body-cameras, with much of the cost going toward storage” (Kotowski, 2016). The larger amount of video produced by every officer adds up to an incredible amount of data for a department to then store securely. Additionally, video quality comes into account when cameras “can shoot in either 720p or 1080p resolution. If shot in 1080p, about twice as much data is being stored in the system” (Kotowski, 2016). Storage alone leads to incredibly high cost for large departments and which are simply unjustifiable with smaller department’s budgets in need of other necessary equipment. Also, an article by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) claim the negative aspects of body cameras are “their potential to invade privacy, their risk of being reduced to just another tool for government mass surveillance, … and their risk of becoming a propaganda tool if the police control what footage the public is allowed to see” (Marlow & Stanley, 2017). The ACLU additionally expresses concern for the use of facial recognition technology in conjunction with body cameras. While such technology could provide an increased efficiency in identifying criminals and compiling separate occasions of …show more content…

However, for the intended purpose of this discussion, according to the most recent studies they would not be a solution to police abuse of authority. Unfortunately, it is an idea that sounds like perfect response on paper but is not supported by statistics after implementation. While the original smaller case studies supported the concept, a researcher on the largest study to date on the subject claims “We found essentially that we could not detect any statistically significant effect of the body-worn cameras” (Durkheimer, 2017). With the newest study arriving at an unexpected conclusion, the cost does not justify the use for a majority of departments. Privacy concerns, like supported by the ACLU and Brennan Center for Justice, can be disputed by acknowledging that any instance that requires interaction with police cannot be considered private. Police interactions are either in the form of direct response for intervention or in the form of as a community caretaker, in both roles privacy cannot be expected. Especially when accounting for the rise in use of cellphone videos, no one can have a reasonable expectation of anonymity or privacy in public. Furthermore, an officer would not have before-hand knowledge of what should be recorded or not. Thus, body cameras that are only activated when necessary due

Get Access