Body Features That Make Someone So Attractive?

The media suggests that physical perfection is everything, which puts a lot of internal

I believe there’s the thought of having a correlation between an individual’s physical appearance and his/her achievements, abilities and/or psychological well-being, but I do not think it occurs. However, since this thought is very common, attractiveness interacts with other status characteristics such as education, income, social status, and occupational prestige to create a positive or negative perception of an individual.

In another study, Langlois and Roggaman (1990) took photos of faces and morphed them together to produce composite images made up of 4, 8, 16 or 32 images. Participants rated faces as increasingly attractive the more faces that went into each image; this applied to both male and female faces. The more faces in an image, the more symmetrical they become, it seems that moving a facial image closer to the average increases its perceived attractiveness. It is likely that symmetry equates to fitness and “good genes”, these people are less likely to have been affected by harmful mutation. People with attractive faces are preferred because of the benefits of passing on these attractive characteristics to offspring. Little & Hancock propose that humans have evolved to be attracted to symmetrical faces because they indicate “averageness”, which equates to genetic health. Grammar and Thornhill (1994) found that females are attracted to males with masculine characteristics, for example: large jaw and prominent cheekbones. These features arise as a result of testosterone, which is also a handicap because it suppresses the immune system. Therefore, showing only “healthy” individuals can afford to produce these traits- advertising a strong immune system. Cartwright (2000) supported this, finding men prefer photographs of women with symmetrical faces and vice versa.

Within the past decade we have witnessed a series of new developments and an enormously growing interest in the understanding of human behaviour, especially when it comes to the basic principles of human mate choice. Mate preference is something which is often considered a very individual choice and appears to be influenced by cultural and economic norms. However, on the basis of numerous research works, it is a today’s acceptation that attractiveness represents a signal resulting from sexual selection. Although we have different preference for facial expression, body shape or height, recent findings suggest that mate preferences are mainly cued on

It Is What Is On the Inside That Counts As Amy Davis says, “True beauty lies deep within. No matter what you look like on the outside, if you know you are beautiful, nobody can change that.” Society today has created a difficult beauty standard for women to attain; therefore, women feel bad about themselves if they do not fit society’s ideal image. In her article, “Face it, ladies: We can’t all be beautiful,” author Elissa Strauss describes the impossible beauty definition we have in the world today.

Generally as the average rating decreased the standard deviation for the ratings increased. Some of the facial ratios measured were either much higher or lower than the golden ratio. The ratios for a/g and b/d were closest to the golden ratio. The greatest variability was seen for the ratio of the tip of the nose to the lips to the width of the lips (standard deviation for 0.87) The second greatest variability was the ratio of the pupil to the lip to the top of the head to the pupil. Interestingly when all the faces measurements were averaged together we could see that all the faces are close to the golden ratio. We next examined the correlations between the absolute difference between phi and the measured ratio (delta phi) and the average attractiveness rating. No significant correlations were seen except for the b/d ratio. Interestingly, as the ratio went farther from the golden ratio the higher the faces were ranked (Spearman’s correlation r = 0.58, p =

Humans attracted to certain features, such as wide hips or bigger busts for females (Gaulin et al. 2012). Scientists believe that we are attracted to certain features because they help humans increase the chances of reproduction. Biological predisposition means that our genes determine our personalities based on our parents. My research will answer the question, “Does biological predisposition influence attraction more than cultural influences?” There are multiple studies done on the topic of what influences attraction. There are some cultural influences in who we are attracted to. Helen Fisher states “but I have come to

Why do people find others attractive? This is a question that has been asked since the human species started taking pride in their appearance. Women and men look for very different qualities. Where a man may look for a small nose and full lips, a women will look for a defined jawline and raised brow line. A female's interest in a male may differ depending on what type of person they wish to be with. If they want a strong masculine man they may want a temporary relationship, while they may look for a gentle looking male for a long term interaction. Facial features also indicate certain desirable or undesirable personality traits, which accounts for the desire of a mate. Studies show that most people find the same faces attractive, which insinuates that today's society has labeled what and what isn't acceptable or beautiful in people.

Henceforth, they could pass down their genes to their offspring. Little et al. (2011) claimed that there are two broadly benefits of choosing an attractive mate: 1) a direct benefit where the perceiver gains for themselves, and 2) an indirect benefit where the perceiver gains genetic benefits to their offspring. Because humans are choosy, people who are objectively beautiful will be advantageous over the unattractive people because they are more preferred as a mate. Therefore, they can pass down their genes to the next generation. Also, they are likely to be chosen because the attractive people’s faces showed traits of parasite resistance, which is an advantage for the offspring (Little et al.,

Beauty sets standards for society through appearance, especially in younger generations due to use of social media and picture editing. “Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder” is a saying that has been around for ages (Plato, n.p.). It is an accurate phrase because of contrasting views within particular individuals. Beauty is present in the good deeds of community members as well as the unity exhibited through dreadful events. It is a flower bud breaking through the dirt into the fresh, spring air. To clarify how beauty is viewed, it is often times the exposure of evil accounting for the new appreciation of something beautiful. After recognizing the privileges we acquire, the existence of beauty is revealed and expressed more easily. In current society, appreciating beauty is substantial to

Today, I will share with you the beauty standards for both men and women in America, South Korea, India, and Nigeria.

Though there are many theories behind why some individuals are more attractive than others, the idea of physical attraction is open for interpretation as it is expected to assist in answering the question of why most people are attracted to the stereotypical concept of blue eyes and blonde hair. Knapton (2015) states that the blonde hair and blue eye mixture originated in Caucasians are thought to have developed among northern European tribes around approximately 11,000 years prior. However, a recent report which undertook a survey to decide the most beautiful women in the world and Brunettes were chosen. Physical attractiveness is an unpleasant variable. Cunningham (1986) states that the investigation of 2 quasi-experiments demonstrates the relation between specific adult female facial features and the attraction,

A commonly mistaken perception of beauty is its need to be aesthetically perfect, but this is not one of its true qualities. As stated

Together, we can lower the numbers of people dying from eating disorders and cosmetic surgeries by resisting the beauty ideal. We can choose “to not participate in the beauty rituals, to not support the industries that produce both images and products, and to create other definitions of beauty” (WVFV, pg. 232). The most crucial and easiest solution is to create other definitions of beauty. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide what is beautiful. What if someone decided that the only thing that could contribute to one’s beauty is who someone is on the inside? Wouldn’t our world be a completely different place? Instead of

According to Rhodes et al. (2005), males with attractive faces and bodies had more short-term partners than their peers, and males with attractive bodies became sexually active earlier than their peers. Females with more attractive faces had more long-term relationships and became sexually active earlier than their peers. In terms of finding a long term and ideal mate for emotional, sexual and reproductive purposes, this statement does not suggest the success of mating in men but only in women thus the claim for attractive people of both gender’s success in mating is refuted. In addition, there are insufficient data to date to determine whether masculinity is attractive to both males and females (Rhodes, 2005). Furthermore, people searching for a partner to have children with may not be interested in extremely attractive partners, because such partners may be more likely to leave them for another partner to have extra-pair relationships (Boothroyd et al, 2008). In particular attractiveness is related to higher