preview

Boeing Co.: Article Analysis

Decent Essays

The purpose of this article written by Jon Ostrower is to inform the public of the changed Boeing is making to the current pension and retirement plans of its employees. The article states, “Boeing Co., following other U.S. companies moving away from traditional pension plans, said Thursday that it would freeze the pension benefits of more than 68,000 nonunion employees, and will shift those workers to 401(k) retirement-savings plans, starting in 2016” (Ostrower, 2014). The change from a prior pension plan is directly associated with incurring costs for the company to continue to pay employees retirement after they have left the workforce. Ostrower explains the statistics of company’s who currently provide pension plans and explains the reasons …show more content…

The shifts in place at Boeing are benefiting the company and providing employees with a new retirement dynamic to learn and utilize. The typical 401(k) is a retirement plan that matches employee contributions and provides tax incentive for employees to put savings back for a later time in their life. A growing number of U.S. companies have swapped traditional pensions for 401(k) plans, effectively shifting the risk of market volatility to their workers and reducing long-term costs (Ostrower, 2014). Many employers offer to match a specific set percentage of contributions in return and this option is great for many reasons, including the ability to roll over the plan with new employment opportunity. Long a powerful recruiting and retention tool, pension plans also leave companies on the hook for long-term obligations that can last decades (Ostrower, 2014). It is rare for college graduates in this time to find one job and continue employment with the specific job until retirement many years in the future and because of this and other reasons the 401(k) is a great option for employers as well as …show more content…

The freeze put in place for current employees who signed up for the pension plans prior to the change will be allowed to keep the benefits already accrued. The company will make bigger contributions to 401(k) accounts over three years, at 9% of eligible income in 2016, % in 2017 and 7% in 2018 (Ostrower, 2014). The contributions will shift back to a range from 3% to 5% afterwards which provides employees some time to catch up on their 401(k) investments as well as benefit with the higher contributions provided. The shift is one that many companies are choosing for multiple reasons but overall the costs to maintain pension plans aren’t benefiting the company in ways they desire. Although the plan provided long term employee retention, the employees may have become stagnant and feel trapped due to the retirement plan they had to previously maintain with the company. There are many benefits as well as difficulties to work through with any change as large as this one, and ultimately the company will benefit and each employee has the opportunity to maintain employed or choose employment

Get Access