Essay on Book Banning and First Amendment Right

Many conservative groups make the argument that the books that have been banned have material that is inappropriate, immoral or contradicting the beliefs they have ingrained in their children and/or their society. Book-banning cases usually concern the protection of children and their innocence, but all that is happening is sheltering parents trying to avoid an awkward confrontation with their child about uncomfortable matters. It is not only selfish, but also harmful to the overall education of their children. The touchy subjects of banned books contain issues that are part of everyday life, and for a group to attempt to censor this subject from younger society is almost absurd; these issues are not monstrous and the censorship of them not only shows prejudice but lack of respect. Others would say that it is the government’s duty to regulate these books. It is the exact

Most of the books that are banned are usually challenged in school and libary. In 2015, nine out of ten most challenged books were diverse. The site We Need Diverse Books explains their and ALA’s defention of diversity:

The banning of books has always been a way for small minded people to ensure that the ideas or beliefs that oppose their own are kept secret, silent, hidden from the eyes of those who wish to consider these ideas for themselves. This practice is an affront to our ideas as a nation, which revolve closely around the ideas of individual freedoms, along with being an unfair system which forces the ideas of one person onto those around them. It also keeps people from being exposed to ideas

It is reasonable for a book to be banned if it is just not suitable for children as in its mature content. But if a book is being banned because of a parent who does not like the book or thinks it is a touchy subject, then it is just not reasonable and there should not even be a discussion about banning it. “Parents who don't like specific books can have their kids "opt out" of an assignment without infringing on the rights of others.” (www.procon.org/headline.php?headlineID=005365). There is no reason for a parent to try to have a book banned because they do not like the content in the book.’’ Also, the parent can choose to have their child not read the book without having it banned from the whole school. Parents should censor their own child and not the entire

Many books have been questioned and challenged. Even as far as to banning them. But what exactly is a banned book and why are they banned? A banned book is a book that has been censored by an authority, a government body, a library, or a even school system. A book that has been banned is actually removed from a library or school system. The actual contextual reasons as to banning them is use of explicit violence, gore, sexuality, explicit language, religion, or dark times in history. On the non-contextual side of the reason why they are banned books are usually because with the best intentions to protect people, frequently children, from difficult philosophies and information. Teachers, or even more common adults, often censor books from

The freedom to read and express ourselves means that we shouldn’t allow the banning of books due to inappropriate material. I have gone to a private school all of my life and I have never experienced books being banned or taken away during school. I am thankful for that, but yet it is highly unfortunate knowing that some public school students did not have the opportunity to read some of the best books ever written. Amazing books such as Harry Potter, To Kill a Mockingbird, and Catcher in the Rye were banned from public schools and these are books that I love and would definitely recommend. I believe the banning of books is unconstitutional and deprives people of learning about the world around them; they also help us learn new ways of thinking and social skills that can be applied to real life.

I agree with Sarah Begley in “What The List Of Most Banned Books Says About Our Society's Fears” because she states how us as citizens have rights, and one of them being the first amendment which grants us freedom of press which prevents the government from interfering with distribution of information and opinions, which is why we shouldn’t be challenging or banning books.” We don’t get many challenges by diverse people,” she adds. In recent years, book challenges have peaked while religious liberty bills were in the news, she says. Some causes for for banning or challenging books may be religious reasons, the religious liberty bill protects us and our freedom. I think this statement is reasonable because people have rights which protect them

Banning books has been an age long controversy since the early 15th century. Beginning in 1455 with the invention of the Guttenberg printing press, this became a much harder situation to control due to the large processes of books being printed out. (Smolla) Since the 15th century, opponents have regularly been enforcing the banning of books due to society’s idea of debatable content. This includes the aspects of sexual content, racism, and sacrilegious content. However, proponents have the stronger argument. Many object that these books are a result of Freedom of Speech, they provide historical documentation, or simply that a person should freely be able to read whatever he or she may enjoy.

Book Banning in Schools Books are banned in school libraries every year. They are pointed out for having inappropriate content, which some believe should not be allowed to be read by students. Unlike in the past, people are allowed to argue against the banning of books as well as fight for it. There are many arguments for the banning of books, such as: it protects family values, parents must protect children from the offensive material that can be found in them, and there are legal standards for the removal of books. On the other hand, there are some that believe that students need bold books to further grow and mature.

Stephen Chbosky once said that “[b]anned books give us silence when we need speech[, i]t closes our ears when we need to listen[, and i]t makes us blind when we need sight” (A Quote). Chbosky is correct because of the first amendment of the constitution. Books are sometimes banned because of the language that the author uses, which takes away the freedom to speech and press that come right from the first amendment of the United States Constitution. They take away the freedoms of speech and press by banning books because of the words and choices that the author decides to use in them.

Why would someone take away a book based on a few opinions? There are many books being banned, but not everyone feels that they should be. In the thirty two year history of banning books, over eleven thousand have been challenged. Books are being banned for three major reasons, violent and sexual explicit material, children reading objectionable material, and the thought that teens will attempt potentially dangerous or morally wrong activities. Banning books should not be allowed because we are ridding many children, teengers, and young adults of lessons and examples that are learned through these books.

So, for the people that wants every book to stay in the library even if they have terrible content, consider all of the things that could happen because of that. Book banning should always be allowed because of how kids act because of them, not knowing what is right or wrong, and talking to their friends about it book banning could be a new start at teaching kids to learn all of the good things and not about the bad, or worse things in life. Help make the school boards take down all of the books that don’t belong

Banning books is a practice that has been used all throughout history. It affects many people such as authors, religious groups, students, and other citizens. When books are banned, it limits the amount a person can read or learn about a certain topic. Banning books is a key component in the novel, Fahrenheit 451, as well as in society throughout history.

Anything forbidden continues to ignite our curiosity. Stories that are prohibited have a way of remaining present in society by people passing them down. Banning books should cease to remain because readers should have access to information since without it people won’t be able to reach their full social potential, future generations won’t learn from past mistakes, and readers will be able to broaden their perspectives on life to resolve world issues. Firstly, book banning is plausible for various reasons, one is due to mental health problems or a child’s molding influence.

As little as one might not want to admit -- reading is one of our greatest freedoms. Keeping that in mind, by limiting the books in which one can read leads to a sense of conformity. Adding to that, that puts a restrictive limit on the range and variety of inquiry and expression on a culture. The United States is a democracy. One of the