1. Identify three types of book genres found in the New Testament and note some of the characteristics of each type.
a. Gospels – The portraits of the person and work of the long pronounced Messiah. Matthew portrays Christ as King; Mark portrays Christ as a servant; Luke portrays Christ as man; and John portrays Christ as God (Unger, 1967). In the Gospels, Christ is made known to the world and his gospel provided in his death, resurrection, and ascension. The books called the Gospels deal with the life and ministry of Jesus. The Gospels do not present us with simple memoirs; rather, they give us proclamations and instructions written from theological standpoints. Additionally, they lack historical background, and analysis of character and personality,
…show more content…
Early church tradition ascribes the books of the New Testament, written in Greek about A.D. 45-95, to the apostles Matthew, John, Paul, and Peter and to their associates Mark, Luke, James, and Jude, the last two also being half-brothers of Jesus. Early church tradition is material that appears in early Christian writings subsequent to the books of the New Testament, that is, from the late first or early second century onward for several centuries. The order of books then, follows a certain logic and is developed as a matter of Christian tradition. The Gospels appear at the beginning because they narrate the momentous events of Jesus’ career. After the Gospels comes the triumphant aftermath of Jesus’ life and ministry in the Acts of the Apostles, a stirring account of the successful upsurge and outreach of the church in Palestine and throughout Syria, Asia Minor, Macedonia, Greece, and as far as Rome. Acts is the last of the historical books of the New Testament. The Letters and Revelation explain the theological significance of the foregoing redemptive history and spells out implications for Christian conduct. Revelations is the book that looks forward to Christ’s return and draws the New Testament to a fitting close (Gundry, …show more content…
In Acts 15 the Council at Jerusalem meets. During these sequence of meetings described in verses 4 through 22, is a general meeting of welcome and report about the work being done among the Gentiles (vv. 5-6); a meeting of the leaders while the church was still assembled (vv. 6-11); a meeting of the apostles, the elders, and the whole assembly (vv. 12-22). Some of the Pharisees having become Christian brought their Judaic beliefs with them. As a result, they believed that Gentiles must first become converts to Judaism and be circumcised (vs. 1), before they would be eligible to be saved by faith. Peter addresses the elders and apostles and presented an argument regarding his own experience: God had sent him to preach to the Gentiles (10:28-29) and give the Holy Spirit to them (15:8) which is the proof of God’s acceptance. He further explains that through the grace of our Lord, circumcision was no longer required to be saved. That rather than be saved by our own acts of righteousness, our grace and freedom was found in the person of Jesus Christ who died for our sins, rose again, and ascended to heaven. The Jewish Christians accepted this explanation and agreed to with four stipulations of their own regarding Gentile behavior. Paul speaks again in Ephesians 2 of this unity in Christ between the Jewish Christian and the Gentile Christian being through Christ, based on what he did through his death, which effectively tore apart the wall that formerly separated them, making
The final eight epistles of the New Testament canon exert an influence out of proportion to their length. They complement the thirteen Pauline Epistles by offering varying perspectives on the richness of Christian truth. Each of the five authors – James, Peter, John, Jude, and the author of Hebrews – made a distinctive contribution from his own point of view. Like the four harmonizing approaches to the life of Christ portrayed in the Gospels, these writers provide a sweeping portrait of the Christian life as a whole and how it should be lived out. Although Paul’s epistles are excellent, the New Testament revelation after Acts would be severely limited by one apostle’s perspective had the writing of these five men been neglected. The
Ch. 1: What is the New Testament? In this chapter, Ehrman discusses the origins of the New Testament. He starts off with the diversity of early Christianity and the large amount of Christian documents that were written during the second century. Ehrman also discusses which Christian literature became canon, including the gospels written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, as well as the epistles and book of revelation.
Those readers who have attended Bible college or seminary will likely have used a New Testament or Old Testament introduction. Such books provide a survey of each book of the Bible, considering questions of date, authorship, occasion for writing, an outline and overview of the contents, and so forth. Such works, which are frequently academic in nature, typically give significant space to technical matters related to critical theories regarding date and authorship.
The Acts of the Apostles is a historical and biblical book detailing the activities of the founders of the Christian church, immediately following the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. It is the fifth book of the New Testament and it tells of the founding of Christianity and the spread of its message to the Roman empire. The Acts translates the words, actions, life, death and resurrection of Jesus, and it forms the basis of much of Christian beliefs today. The Acts and the Gospel of Luke making up a two-part work known as the Luke- Acts; written by an anonymous author who was believed to be one of the apostles by the name of Luke. Although the Acts talks mainly about two apostles,
Ephesians 2:14-22 contains three key concepts that’s portrayed throughout the whole book; unity in Christ, grace through faith and a holy way of living. These three concepts go more into depth within the overall book of Ephesians but are summed up within verses 2:14-22. The paragraph before the passage addresses that the Gentiles were different from the Jews and that they were living apart from Christ, but are to live as one people, together in unity. In the paragraph after the passage, Paul reiterates that the Gentiles are to be treated equally with the Jews and that they have grace through their faith in Christ.
At the birth of the Early Church there were no Gentiles within the Christian community. The relationship between Judaism and Christianity became more complex as people began to accept Gentiles into the church. The book of Acts makes clear to us that the conflict that had arisen was between two different groups of Jewish people, the Hellenists and the Hebrews. The Hellenists, although Jewish, were open to a Hellenistic culture unlike the Hebrews, and it was through them that a connection to the gentile world was created. The Jewish church would eventually wain and the leaders of the Christian movement proclaiming the Gospel would then become predominantly Gentile.
Prophecy, poetry, songs, and genealogy lists are just a few of the many genres found in the Pentateuch. However, the two dominant genres include biblical law and biblical narrative. In fact, 40 percent of the Old Testament is narrative (“Lecture 1,” 2015). Key to interpreting different texts within the Bible, it is critical to understand the genres themselves. Each genre possesses unique features that, when understood, assist in the interpretation of the text. Understanding the key features of biblical law and biblical narrative genres will affect how an individual interprets Scripture in the Old Testament.
The book of Acts is known as 'the birth of the church'. Acts recounts the story of
The gospel of Luke is one of the four gospels pertaining to the New Testament. The Gospel of Luke is the most extensive historical account of the life of Jesus. It was originally written for a certain Theophilus, probably a Gentile of high social standing, and intended to inform him extensively of the life and work of Christ. Throughout this gospel the person of Jesus is presented as the perfect Man who always lived according to the will of God. And the account that Luke offers us of his life appears divided in two basic parts: the coming to the world of the Son of God and the return to his glory. It narrates from before the birth of John the Baptist, until the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Matthew, Mark, Luke, John are beautiful authors, or should I say scribes. We all know that all the books in the Bible weren’t written without Gods help. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are called, the Gospels. The Gospels are four books written strictly on Jesus’s life on Earth. These books were published for all of mankind to read and study.
The word "gospel" is a translation of the Greek word "euangelion" which means "good news. The first three books in the New Testament (Mark, Matthew, and Luke) are often referred to as the Synoptic Gospels (from Greek synoptikos, "seen together") They bear greater similarity to each other than any of the other gospels in the New Testament. Along with these similarities come some differences among the gospels, suggesting that each gospel was written for a specific audience and for a specific purpose. This paper will examine the resurrection of Jesus, while identifying the significant differences between Mark, Matthew and Luke. This paper will also analyze the differences to suggest the prominent theological perspective each gospel author
According to our text, the New Testament is comprised of four primary literary forms: Gospels, History, Letters and Apocalyptic (Harris, 2014). The Gospels was made up of four books written by four separate authors who tell of Jesus from four individual viewpoints based upon their understanding of who Jesus was, yet it does not cover the lifespan of Jesus, only certain accounts. Therefore, it is not considered historical or a biography but is defined as ‘sui generis’. The historical counts of the life of Christ is noted in the book of Acts. This book tells of the history of the early church but by all accounts doesn’t use traditional criteria most often noted in historical writings. The Epistles are known as letters. These letters were thought to be written by Paul and his followers. The letters were often written to the various churches rather than people or individuals. They were also written to address issues, concerns or to offer praise for specific acts or behaviors. Thus, letters or epistles addressing sin were more of the rebuking nature to bring correction and accountability in the effort to restore the parishioners to appropriate, God-fearing behaviors. Whereas, other letters may be to praise churches for exemplifying model behaviors that could be used for strong witnessing. The latter form is known as the apocalyptic writings. This form tends to deal with the End Times and was suspected to have been written during the time of church persecution. The book of Revelation in particular, was written around the 1st century when Christians were said to have been killed for their faith. It is during this time that the question was raised regarding God’s role and whether or not he would win. It was stated emphatically that God would win and would redeem his people.ReferenceHarris, S. L., (2014). The New Testament: A Student’s Introduction (8th ed.). Dubuque:McGraw-Hill Education.
All four gospels present Jesus as both the Son of God and son of man. They all record His baptism, the feeding of the 5,000 from five loaves and two fishes, Mary's anointing of the Lord Jesus, His prayer in the garden of Gethsemane, His betrayal, trial, crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection. However, each writer
The report primarily starts by introducing the industry and overview of both WH Smith and its main competitor. The segmental analysis in terms of region and product will follow to have clear understanding of the companies’ structure.
During the early history of the church, there was no such thing as a New Testament “canon.” The selection of books that were to be included or excluded from the texts used by the church was the responsibility of each individual church body, and thus varied greatly from location to location. Because there was no canon – (books considered