Book Of Acts Act 1 Analysis

The Gospel of Luke was also written around eighty CE, written somewhere outside of Palestine (Tatum, 1999, p.34). The author may have been Luke the Gentile Christian, writing to another Gentile, Theophilus. Like Matthew, Luke is strongly believed to be written after Mark, with references from him, “Q” and “L” if following the Two (Four)-Document Hypothesis. The authors of Luke and Matthew are believed to be written during the same time without the knowledge of knowing. As mentioned before, Luke is about fifty percent longer than Mark is, making it important source since it contains more information about the historic life of Jesus. There is also a second part to Luke which is the book Acts, but is separate in Bible. Both include the beginnings

Luke was a medical doctor, a missionary, and evangelist, a historian, a researcher, and the writer of the third Gospel. The book of Luke was written in a formal literacy introduction noting his purpose in writing, his methodology, and the attempts others had made in such writing. Luke is the author of the book and it was written in AD 60 in Caesarea. According to Hindson and Elmer Luke’s purpose is to give “an orderly sequence” of the events about Christ’s birth, life, and sacrificial death followed by his resurrection and ascension back to heaven. The occasion calling for Luke to write his Gospel was that Theophilus, and other new believers like him, needed a clear account of the life and ministry of Jesus as an aid to confirm his faith

I chose to read The Gospel of Luke for my project. It is said that The Gospel of Luke was written somewhere between 80 CE - 90 CE. The Gospel of Luke was written for Theophilus, who was called “Friend of God”. But The Gospel was also written for a wider audience, including converts and potential converts.

the early church from the time of Jesus' ascension to Paul's arrival as a prisoner in Rome. Acts was written by the author of Luke's gospel, Luke. Although the author does not name himself, evidence from the book itself proves that the author was Luke.

Saint Luke was one of the seventy apostles. He had a very important job. Saint Luke was a priest for many years. He was chosen for a couple reasons to be one of seventy apostles. One of them was that he was a priest. Another reason was how he treated others he was know as a very kind and thoughtful man. This is why there are many church’s and hospitals in the world named after saint Luke. Luke’s goal in life was to spread the good news about God and Jesus Christ. Luke was chosen to be one of the seventeen apostles for a couple reasons but Jesus knew he would follow him and he knew he could trust Luke and said

Paul, formerly known as Saul, is first introduced in Acts 7-8 as a persecutor of Christians, and one compliant during Stephen’s stoning. In Acts 9, Saul has an encounter with the risen Christ that changes his life forever. Throughout Paul’s ministry, whether preaching to Jews or Gentiles, he will always proclaim the resurrection. Paul is extremely important to the book of Acts as he picks up Peter’s ministry and continues to take the gospel further and further into the Gentile world. While Luke is recording Paul’s ministry in the book of Acts, Paul is also writing letters (also known as the Pauline epistles) which now make up a majority of the New Testament. It is in these letters that Paul goes into detail defending his apostleship, but Luke will also defend him by describing him as a man filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 13:9), an apostle (Acts 14:14), and showing the parallels between the miracles both he and Peter performed.

These letters had already been written when Luke wrote the Book of Acts, but a close reading indicates that they are independent of one another. Paul wrote letters to

Luke’s Gospel is known to be the last synoptic to be written. Since Luke introduced Acts, it is crucial to date Acts before a date for Luke can be determined. Luke leaves the reader with Paul in Rome, waiting to present his case before Caesar. Acts had been completed long before Paul’s outcome was known, this means that Acts came about in the early sixties with the Gospel of Luke being written in the late fifties or early sixties. Luke-Acts doesn’t mention the destruction of Jerusalem, which is why there are uncertainty of where Christianity fits in amongst the religions of the Roman Empire, and the uncertainty of Jew-Gentile relations at the same level as in Paul’s epistles.

Next, was the Gospel of Mark. Mark was written for the greeks. Mark goes into great detail mentioning and explaining Jewish laws and culture which give us a hint into who he was directing his Gospel towards. Luke wrote his book for the everyday nonbeliever. He focused on the outcasts at the time; the Samaritans, gentiles, and almost everyone who was not a Jew.

The writer of Luke-Acts is considered anonymous because there is not enough evidence for scholars to determine it was Luke, despite some recent studies that show a note stating Luke as the author (Harris, 2014, p 199). This note address Luke as the "beloved" physician that accompanied Paul during his journey (Harris, 2014, p 199). During the text it seems that the writer does use medical terms as a physician would. Despite this evidence, the author never identifies himself in the Gospel or in Acts (Harris, 2014, p 200). The writer shows no knowledge of Paul's letters and when he does speak of Paul or his character, it seems that he does not know him very well (Harris, 2014, p 200).

The book of Acts was written by the physician Luke. Luke was a traveling missionary with Paul. In result, the book of Acts is written mostly about Peter and Paul and how the Christian faith spread to the whole world. Peter, who is known as Simon Peter or Cephas, was one of the first disciples of Jesus. Peter was always outspoken and on the day of pentecost, in chapter 2 of Acts, Peter was the main speaker. He was considered to be the “pillar” and “rock” of the church even though he had fallen when he had denied Jesus three times. Paul also known as Saul, on the other hand, was not one of the original disciples of Jesus. He was a former teacher of the law and was converted to Christianity when

The author of the work of Luke-Acts has many ways to refer to Jesus. Jesus is referred to as the Christ, the Lord, Son of man and Son of God and even is understood through the use of the Old Testament as the promised Messiah from the Jewish Scripture.

The Gospel according to Luke exhibits several differences from the other Synoptic Gospels. Unlike Matthew and Mark who record Jesus saying: "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" Luke states "Father, into your hands, I commend my Spirit."

According to Matera, Luke-Acts is a well-defined set of time periods. The Gospel is considered the time of Jesus and Acts is the time of the Church. The time of Jesus in Luke's Gospel foreshadows the Church (Matera, 7). As stated in Stanton, "Luke set out the story of Jesus as a prelude to the story of the origin and growth of the early Church" (Stanton, 80). John, on the other hand, focuses on Christology and the teachings of Jesus to the community (Matera, 9). Both Gospels contain strong references to discipleship, which form the basis for the Church.

The theme of the gospel of Luke talks about the journey of the life of Jesus, Christ. His death, burial, and resurrection. Moreover, his ministry, teachings and parables. As a historian, and physician, Luke was not only eloquent in his writing about Jesus; he also took interest in his early life. The Gospel of Luke also depict Jesus as compassionate, caring, and loving. Likewise, Luke not only put Jesus at the heart of the Jewish world during the first century, but also at the heart of the Roman world, where with the Christian gospel exploded.