Booker T Washington .vs. W.E.B Dubois

In terms of voting, Dubois believed that agitating for the ballot was necessary, but opposed giving the vote to the uneducated blacks. He believed that economic gains were not secure unless there was political power to safeguard them. Washington, on the other hand, felt that the right to vote was not a necessity and the only thing that would come out of protesting for voting rights is the irritation of whites.

Booker T. Washington believed that blacks should not push to attain equal civil and political rights with whites. That it was best to concentrate on improving their economic skills and the quality of their character. The burden of improvement resting squarely on the shoulders of the black man. Eventually they would earn the respect and love of the white man, and civil and political rights would be accrued as a matter of course. This was a very non-threatening and popular idea with a lot of whites.

Furthermore, Booker T. Washington did not share strategies with Du Bois on one side, and the strategies of W. E. B. Du Bois did not share with Washington. Booker mostly focused on education and wanted African Americans to fight for what they’re worth, to work hard and become someone important in the community. On the other hand, Washington fought for equality. He wanted the White Americans to respect the blacks. His point view was that the community should be led by the most talented. Basically, he wanted blacks and

Booker T. Washington was brought up with a different upbringing then most slaves during the 1800s; as he would describe as “up from slavery”. Even though he was born a slave, he had a better chance of “equal access” and equality in main stream America. He had a chance to gain an education part time during his younger years as well as working. Booker T, believed the best way to ensure progress and peace was,”for the whites to respect the blacks desire for improved economic opportunities and for blacks to respect the whites desire for social separation of the races.” I agree with this ideology because everyone was getting a piece of

Two great leaders of the black community in the late 19th and 20th century were W.E.B. Du Bois and Booker T. Washington. However, they sharply disagreed on strategies for black social and economic progress. Their opposing philosophies can be found in much of today's discussions over how to end class and racial injustice, what is the role of black leadership, and what do the 'haves' owe the 'have-nots' in the black community.

W.E.B. DuBois was a very strong advocate for black people being treated equally to white people. He co-founded the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) Which was a very important part of the civil rights movement. The NAACP was “created to work for the abolition of segregation and discrimination in housing, education, employment, voting, and transportation; to oppose racism; and to ensure African Americans their constitutional rights”. He also created a book called “The Souls Of Black Folk” Which made him more popular, with the main Idea of the book being that the “central problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color line.” He was a man who fought for equality, where Booker T. Washington, on the other hand, did not. Booker T. Washington thought that black people should in fact have different rights then white people, and that instead of fighting it, black people should just accept it, and focus on economic self-improvement. He also believed that black people should not fight for equal rights, because it would lead to more anti-black violence, such as lynching which is the act of killing someone, most commonly by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority. By these facts you can tell that Washington and

Although Booker T. Washington and WEB Dubois both share a handful of qualites, such as working to achieve social and economic equality for African Americans, their philosophies on how to do that were drastically different. Born into slavery, but freed after the Civil War, Washington believed that African Americans should work from the bottom up; he thought a gradual approach would be the best method to achieve social equality. He preached a philosophy of self-help and racial solidarity and urged African Americans to accept discrimination for the time being, while they worked to socially elevate themselves through means of material wealth and hard work. Washington believed that African Americans would achieve full social equality only after they proved their economic value in society. Therefore, he thought that African Americans should receive vocational training and founded the Tuskegee Normal and

Both, W. E. B. Du Bois believed and Booker T. Washington was academic, black leaders, who represented the fight against the segregation but yet, both had different perspective of the future education of black Americans.

Booker T. Washington and W.E.B DuBois have been prominent figures of Black history since the beginning of their careers. Both men are known for attending to issues of their community, as well as leaving a permanent mark on the question as to how Blacks should achieve equality in America. Although both of them fought for a common cause, each of them approached the question differently. Washington endorsed a slow process of independence which focused more on economic issues while DuBois strived for a much broader spectrum of freedom, insisting on full civil rights in all areas. One could even say that their different points of view on the subject divided the Black community into two different camps. After reviewing the life and the work of both men one can come to the conclusion that W.E.B DuBois, although the more radical, and the less preferred of the two, made contributions far more significant to the advancement of Black people than Booker T.

W.E.B Du Bois and Booker T. Washington were two important African Americans back in their time they contribute towards the world to help the world become a better place not for just African Americans but for all people. Du Bois wrote a book called “Of Our Spiritual Strivings” and in this book, he talks about African Americans and how they can get freedom. Washington gave a speech called the “Atlanta compromise” and in this speech, he talks about how African Americans can better themselves by focusing on things other than social equality. Dubois and Washington both use rhetoric devise in their work to either persuade or put more power behind their point of view.

Booker T. Washington’s approach on ending racism was very different then other’s at the time, but it was still extremely effective. Washington thought the best

Booker T. Washington was a very well respected man who also had many people that questioned his knowledge and beliefs. One of the most prominent men that questioned Washington was W.E.B. Du Bois. Du Bois believed differently than Washington and raised numerous questions about Washington’s achievements, but they both ultimately were striving for the same goal. They both wanted African Americans to be equals, and furthermore wanted a level playing field for all, regardless of their skin color. The problem was that they differed on the way to achieve this goal. Du Bois was critical of Washington in the way he handled the civil and political rights of African Americans, the way he stressed industrial revolution over higher education, and the time frame in which to accomplish this ultimate goal they both strove for. To understand all the differences between these two men, we must first look to how and where they were raised.

Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois came from very different backgrounds and as a result, they had very different thinking patterns. Booker T. Washington was born into slavery. It’s surprising that Washington grew up to become a teacher because it was illegal for him to be able to read and write as a child. Before Washington became a teacher, he always had to put learning on the backburner and work in order to support his family. In order to get into college, Washington had to walk 500 miles and work as a janitor to be able to pay his tuition. Soon after he was admitted into the college, he received a scholarship sponsored by a white man. The sponsor was General Armstrong, a commander of a

Booker T Washington and W.E.B Dubois are two African American leaders who took a different look at discrimination and segregation experienced by African-Americans. Booker T Washington wanted to take an approach to being discriminated against African Americans are going to have to learn how to put up with this. Washington took what he considered to be a more practical approach to these problems he emphasized discrimination and segregation for the time being. He also said that if African Americans would like to make more money than they need to do things that people need or want. Basically, he said African American people need to be or learn skilled trades to earn more money and improve their lives. Booker T Washington didn't want anybody else he just wanted African-American people to put up with discrimination. He wanted African Americans to cope with this. Booker T Washington also didn't challenge social segregation. He did not want to be a part of any violence so that's why he didn't challenge it because he knows that if he would have challenged the racist people then he probably would have got killed. He wanted black people to prove themselves to racist people. Black people would need to be able to do certain things that racist people can do but African

In the 19th century, many African Americans have faced great discrimination and suffering. During this time of racism, there were two main leaders that wanted to help resolve the issues. Their names were Booker T. Washington and William Edward Burghardt DuBois. These two men had different views regarding the method that would benefit African Americans within society. Since they did not support each other, this caused the African American community to split in half. While their methods may be different, both of these men agreed on the fact that it was time for a change in the treatment of African Americans.