Books, Pencils, And Security Cameras. Walking And Laughing

Improvement in security will also contribute to a safe environment. High schools should implement the use of metal detectors as well as random searches. Although, it may be tedious to remove all metal and coins from your pockets, it will ensure safety. This security measure can be specific to each school. An example being to make the checks random throughout the week or only require it for students to have a late arrival. Random searches can also be specified such as only searching lockers or classrooms. Motion sensored cameras can also be a very effective with safety. In many school’s cameras are only in the hallways and lunchroom, but what happens when violence occurs in a classroom? All evidence will be based off hearsay. This is not an effective way of assessing the incident considering there are 3 sides to every story. Adding motion cameras to classrooms will make evidence accurate. Not only will student-student altercations be recorded, but teacher-student altercations will be recorded. Security guards themselves should also be improved. Security guards should be posted in hallways upon children arrival, during passing periods, and upon school dismissal. Security guards should also be fit enough for the job. “The results indicated that utilization of multiple security measures reduced the likelihood of exposure to property

In today's school system, there have been uproars about the student's privacy and safety at the schoolhouse. Some parents feel that their child's safety is more important because of the rules that the school has set forth to maintain a safe environment. Others feel that their child's privacy should be taken seriously because they should be treated more like an adult. In recent news, there has been concerns about the student's safety that cause some to get injured or killed; while, student's privacy has cause the police to get involved. The school system should be concerned as well as, aware about the student’s privacy and safety at their prospective school.

The school has allowed an undisclosed number of certified teachers to carry handguns. The school has also begun to use several other methods to protect students including keyless locks, a camera system, and classroom phones. In the eyes of most people these defenses would be seen as enough, however, superintendent David Thweatt disagrees. Thweatt believes his school can never be secure enough. His wife works at the school and his children are students, he stated that he feels more secure knowing his family is protect by trained teachers. Thweatt also stated that the closest police station is 30 miles away and he doubts an officer could make it soon enough to assist the school. (Current

In Clarksville, Arkansas many teachers, janitors, and other faculty members have already begun to act as armed guards, ready to defend and protect at any moment necessary. This school district along with the parents feel that arming their teachers and staff is the most effective way to keep their students and children safe. The writer proceeds to express some of the many concerns that this school district had. One being that their school is located twenty minutes away from the nearest police station, which is far too long of a response time to effectively stop the shooting, therefore if school officials are armed it gives everyone a “fighting chance”. Additionally, the writer further emphasizes on the fact that hiring one school officer would cost the district $50,000 while training thirteen staff members only cost $68,000.

Even children who come from middle-class and upper-middle-class communities don’t feel safe in schools. The nightmares, always about being chased, lingered for years. Even now, the images of children walking out of schools with their hands up are too much for people to bear. As we all know that this has been a very controversial topic in the past years, it might be hard for people I power to fix this will not trying to break any amendments like taken away people right to own a gun. Because this can cause more chaos amongst the American people and we are not trying to split us, but to unite us by stand tall the problem we have to face on Saturday, some of Haviland’s students, born in the years after Columbine, participated in the Denver “March For Our Lives” to protest school gun violence, one of many demonstrations held across the United States. In the nation’s capital, students from Parkland, Fla.still grieving the friends and classmates they lost last month led an impassioned rally attended by a massive crowd that demanded gun reform. By Ryan Quinn, Education Reporter, Charleston Gazette Mail As part of a new training program, Kanawha County school officials are now ling students and teachers, they shouldn't automatically hunker down in classrooms if there's someone with a gun in their school.Perhaps most controversial is the program's guidance that students can physically confront a shooter as

Though a fair amount of time and money towards searches there is still an alarming amount of theft and assault on school property. As technology has advanced over the years schools have gotten electronic gadgets and techniques to keep students out of trouble. As the amount of technology and precautions taken to avoid students getting in trouble the amount of students breaking rule increases with it. Though schools take many steps to protect students, pupils still report that drugs are made accessible to them on school property, schools combine document that nearly 2 million crimes were reported to them, and many students still feel unsafe (violence in U.S. public schools). These reports show that millions of dollars provided by taxes go towards school security and it has done less than intended.

Many will argue that the security measurements the government are taking are going too far, so far that it is being questioned whether privacy is being invaded, Bailey Nunn investigates. T he on-going intractable nature of the “privacy vs. security” debate has, for numerous years, been unresolved. Those who believe in security over privacy intend to make a safer city, whilst others believe that their privacy is being unnecessarily invaded, nevertheless, this topic is argued globally. In many countries, the use of surveillance cameras has become very prevalent, inevitably leading to more privacy issues being raised by citizens. The use of surveillance devices has become so common that it has affected our way of living, we are no longer able

If we want proper community safety, then some of privacy will have to be sacrificed. For example, students cyberbullying other students and acting inappropriate is not right, so the school wants to keep students out of legal trouble. “If a school catches a student bullying someone online before the police do, the student is less likely to end up in legal trouble.” says Joseph Maneen from “Watch What You Type”. No parent wants to have to deal with court because of their child, so, the school can keep them

Social media captured terrified students hiding, we heard gun shots echo in the building. They look to us for help. As superintendents of the public schools in Monroe County, we know that students’ ability to learn depends on the

Cameras can help you can see what the people in the hallway are doing and see any fights that’s so they can come and stop it before it even start. You can see some kids that are late and send them to ISS.

The people against surveillance also pressure the fact that cameras can bring to mind off-putting emotions in citizens, giving citizens a feeling of being constantly observed and somewhat controlled. This refers both to adults and children, who have already recognized their views on the society, government, and the state, or who are in the process of developing a view. Jay C. Stanley, a higher-ranking policy analyst for the American Civil Liberties Union thinks, “Constant surveillance, from the time children enter school to the time they leave, teaches the wrong thing about the relationship between the citizen and the government in a democratic society.” Stated succinctly, children may believe the state has a right to interfere in the private

Purpose: To inform the audience about electronic surveillance and the right to privacy Thesis: Electronic surveillance and the right to privacy is an increasingly controversial issue in modern American society. In this speech I will describe the technology, how employers and the government use the technology, and how the courts have interpreted the right to privacy. Organizational Pattern: Topical I. Introduction A. Attention Getter- 'I always feel like somebody's watching me' have you ever felt this way in the workplace or elsewhere?

The idea of increasing the amount of security through the use of technology, security on perimeter, trained staff for the use of guns, drills and coordination with the local emergency responders has been a raised question. Electronic doors and gates, cameras and alarms - are to be fitted into the school. So basically, creating prisons for very young children to receive their education in. Imagine being a parent and sending your child to a ‘school’ which is armed by law

Schools should have the right to monitor the internet. If you_Ñére in school grounds the school has the right to monitor what you_Ñére doing because you_Ñére on school grounds. Once you_Ñére on school grounds the rules change. People should already know that they are limited once they_Ñére on school grounds. It is a good thing for schools to monitor the internet to keep everyone safe. It would help prevent people from going on places

Schools should have security cameras, because they are a useful entity to protect civilians on campus, could serve as deterrents for those bad teachers, and create an overall better learning environment for everyone. Primarily, security cameras are only one of the many pieces of technology that schools use as a security system to prevent intruders. As quoted in Source 2, “Tragedies such as the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut in 2012 have raised alarms for increased school security”; cameras could have been a useful tool in this situation. On the other hand, many opponents would support the cost issue.