Boston Marathon Bombing Research Paper

Good Essays
The 21st century has been a dangerous time for the western world. With the rise of many terrorist groups such as al-Qaida and Isis, America and many parts of the world has become a target in their eyes. These groups as put the lives of the American people at risk multiple times. Terrorism is an international problem in today’s global community. Many nations are affected, whether directly or indirectly. Most nations oppose terrorism, while others condone or even support active, brutal terrorism and terrorist groups. Since the horrible day of 9/11 to the Boston marathon bombing. It comes to a point where the united states government and its people have to make an decision, between security over liberty. Many government officials such as David…show more content…
Policies that make the nation more secure, particularly against foreign threats, do not necessarily undermine its people’s liberty. Protecting individual liberty does not invariably hobble the nation’s defense. Many government officials believe a threat to America’s security is also a threat to Americans’ liberties. Many look to Britain, as they have tightened security laws at many moments without becoming an unfree country. After the threat is removed the polices are too. Many Americans say that due to the increases in western security services, it has made it much harder in recent years for terrorist to launch large attacks. Individuals such as Tony Blair (a former prime minster of Britain) believe that in order to protect people from terrorist attacks, the government can no longer ask nicely to achieve peace. As they refer to drone attacks, that allowed security services to kill a terrorist without first having a trial. This shows that because security was favored over liberty that the government was able to stop a potential terrorist from arming others. Though this might have saved many lives, the actions of the British government have put its own people’s lives at even more risk. Many government officials, such as consecrates believe that liberals are on the wrong side of history as they fail to acknowledge the only wat to protection is to tighten laws. However, these individuals fail to see what liberals see as the people of Britain are now vurnable to the governments tyranny, instead of terrorist. For example, Britain claims that it has accomplished security without rendering civil liberties useless; but after the tragic events of 11 September, 2001, emergency laws were passed which allowed for the indefinite detention of foreign nationals, who were suspected of being terrorists. Under this
Get Access