Boys With Divorced Parents Essay

In a study published in 2007, Sarrazin and Cyr claim that aggression is more rampant if the child is left in the custody of the less dominant parent. If the child identifies him or herself with the less dominating opposite sex or the dominating same-sex parent there could be increased problems of aggression. If the father is the dominant figure then boys show fewer problems and vice-versa for girls if the mother is the dominant figure [ (Sarrazin & Cyr, 2007) ]. The father figure is very important especially to adolescent boys because when father is absent they react more aggressively than girls [ (Dreman, 2000; Sarrazin & Cyr, 2007) ]. Portnoy [ (2006) ] stated that “20 percent of divorced fathers do not see their children at all during their high school years” [ (p. 76) ]. Oftentimes when boys are placed in the custody of the mother these mothers “identify sons with their ex-spouse” which results in the child exerting more aggression either towards the custodial parent, non-custodial parent or others [ (Dreman, 2000) ].

·  Based on your review of the statistics in the study, do you agree with the study’s conclusions? Why or why not?

One criticism of this research is that it is correlational. Therefore, we cannot infer a causal

In light of the evidence that is presented, with least research to assist in understanding the issues

What was the main motive for this research? (e.g., gap in previous research, contradictory results)

Explain what study design is employed here? Do you agree or disagree with the study design? Explain why?

It is evident that that the article boasts bogus claims regardless of the chart it shows. There of course is no way this child could affect any divorce but his own parents and that depends on whether or not he was actually the cause of the divorce in the first place. If in fact these parents could not discipline their child, resulting in harmony in their own home lays firmly on their parenting skills and not on the child. For statistics to link, him to other divorces is a bogus claim.

What was the purpose of this study? Why did the authors ' feel the need for this particular research?

According to Carrell and Hoekstra (2010) children from troubled families decrease their peers’ test score outcomes and increase misbehavior. These findings are consistent with a much larger research such as that children exposed to domestic violence are associated with a number of emotional and behavioral problems including

Marriage, believed by many, is supposed to last until the death of one of the married people. However, this is not the case. A divorce has many effects on both divorced parties, but especially on their children, teenagers to be more specific. The aim of this research is to show the effects of a divorce of parents in teenager’s mentalities.

"Very young children, under the age of three, often don't understand what is going on. Those bit older often feel they are to blame, and are afraid of losing the other parent. They cling to their parent, have nightmares, and need endless reassurance." Younger children tend to fantasize a great deal about their parents getting back together whereas for older children, it is a different perspective. " Preadolescent youngster fail to see divorce as a logical solution and feel that their parents should stay together. For adolescents, divorce may be seen as a relief in some instances, however there is pain." Research indicates, and experts agree that divorce is a very painful transition in the lives of all the members involved. The emotional impact, however, will depend on the nature of the child. Behaviour Trends Divorce brings on behaviour changes in children of all ages. Again, they vary from child to child. "Adolescent males often become more aggressive and destructive. Females, however, initially take things fairly well, assuming a lot of family responsibility. But in young adulthood, they develop problems. This is known as the "sleeper effect." The behaviour of the child of a divorced family is mainly developed by the single parent whom they live with " … Studies show that many boys in single parent

Half of recently divorced mother’s custody families and half from continuously duel parent families. The first year of their study, the children with divorced parents exhibited more behavioral and emotional problems than the children with duel married parents. However, two years after divorce children with single parents no longer had a high number of problems, although still a few difficulties for boys. The author refutes this idea by saying that despite this temporary improvement, a later wave of data collection revealed that the remarriage of the single parent was followed by additional problems among the children, especially with their daughters. His conclusion is that trying to make sense of this research can be frustrating, because the results of each study can vary considerably: some serious negative effects of divorce, others modest effects, and yet others have no effects. This is due to the different scenarios of studies like for example, it is important to consider the ages of the children, the reason why the family became a single family. In order to make research work in such complex body of research, social scientists use a technique known as meta-analysis. By using an effect size for each study (which reflects the difference between two groups by using an effect size for each study (which reflects the difference between two

What is the most worrying is the over aggression and the consideration for others categories. Both are denoted on the chart as having significant differences. The children were rated by their peers on how “Likely to care about the other child’s feelings”(403) and how likely to “defend a child being made fun of by the group”(403). These children show less regard for their peers feelings, and that is alarming. Overt aggression is described as a measure of how they express anger at other children. They were scored based on their tendencies to physically lash out, verbally lash out, or show little to no anger. The study goes through every detail of how it was conducted, and how Hoffman came to the conclusion he did. This is all summed up in the conclusion; which clearly shows that boys’ whose father is absent is more likely to feel less guilt, display anger through physical aggression, and disregard their peers feelings.

You can read and analyze the studies published and attempt to come to a conclusion yourself, but doing this isn’t easy. These studies are very complicated and it’s the leading minds in the researchers’ respective fields conducting the experiments. It may be difficult to understand and properly analyze what they’ve done to come to the conclusion they have.

The Journal of Youth and Adolescence manifests that divorce does not damage a child's existence as, "being exposed to conflict within the family in the form of arguments and violence is positively related to feelings of anger and depressed mood among adolescents" (LIRN). The various authors of this complex article attempt to clarify that there is a definite correlation between depression and anger as well as family conflict. The article distinguishes that divorce does not harm children but in actuality provides relief from continuous turmoil and an oppressive environment. This