Brain Doping May Improve Athletes Performance Summary

Savulescu in "Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement" suggests that we have an obligation to enhance. His core argument can be interpreted as threefold: The right thing to do to enhance, the consistency that comes with the enhancement, and there is no difference between enhancement and treating diseases.

Humanity is always trying to find a way to make themselves better. In recent news, this has led to a moral debate on weather or not using performance enhancing drugs for sports is morally correct or not. But, what if we had already manipulated the human body to make it better before we were even born? This is what Bill McKibben is referencing in his essay “Designer Genes”, on the morality and the biological arms race that could result when dealing with genetic manipulation and engineering. Though the cat isn’t out of the bag for genetic engineering he references what scientists are doing to skim the fine line that laws and ethics have laid down for us. McKibben’s audience is people who can make laws

Football brain injuries are somewhat common and people are more aware of the types of damage it can cause to the brain. A concussion is a mild traumatic brain injury. It can occur after an impact to the head or after a whiplash-type injury that causes the head and brain to shake quickly back and forth. Concussions are usually not life-threatening, but they can cause serious symptoms that require medical treatment. Concussions are traumatic injuries that result in an altered mental state that may include becoming unconscious. It disrupts the normal functioning of the brain. Anyone can become injured during a fall, car accident, or any other daily activity. If people participate in impact sports such as football or boxing, they have an increased risk of getting a concussion. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that in 2010 approximately 2.5 million people in the United States visited the hospital with traumatic brain injuries. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is the term used to describe brain degeneration likely caused by repeated head traumas. It is a condition of brain damage which persists over a period of years or decades and which is the result of traumatic impacts to the brain. CTE is diagnosed only by an autopsy by studying sections of the brain. It is a very rare condition.

The evolution of technology has been hand in hand with the human subjugation of earth, but the question persists, when does the use of technology go too far? Advances in medical science have increased the average human lifespan and improved the quality of life for individuals. Medical science and biology are steadily arriving at new ways to alter humans by the use of advanced genetic alteration. This technology gives rise to the question of how this new technology ought to be used, if at all. The idea of human enhancement is a very general topic, since humans are constantly “enhancing” themselves through the use of tools. In referring to human enhancement, I am referring specifically to the use of genetic intervention prior to

The sport football has come along way from all the injuries to the new sports gear to protect them from injuries.Many players were had suffered from memory lost and brain disorders .The NFL is trying to make the gear more protective to stop these injuries.The brain disorders are head injuries caused by a violent tackle when they hit hit ground also when they butt heads with each other.In 2015 studies have shown that the NFL has made it safer by constantly working on the protective gear for the head neck and there spine.They have been working with the military and NASCAR for them to donate millions of dollars for research on brain injuries for the NFL.

When dealing with the morality of making ourselves more than human we need to draw a line between therapy and enhancement. Several proponents of the human enhancement argument, or transhumanists, are rather loathe to separate the two for a few reasons. Currently, modern medicine practices several methods of treatment that can be considered enhancements, as there is nothing currently wrong with the patient so there is technically nothing to treat. This includes things like vaccines, preventative care, and cosmetic surgery. (Bostrom, Roache 1) Another is that we treat things that are intrinsic to the person, such as a genetic or mental disorder. We use things such as chemicals or surgery to bring the person to a level as close to “average” human as possible. Their personal baseline of their physiology is brought up to speed with humanity and they tend to live happier lives. However, even though the argument is quite sound, human nature is much more complex. While we hopefully like to celebrate others ' individuality, we still want to strengthen those we see as weak, while at the same time maintaining our own superiority. This is where the fundamental difference between therapy and enhancements lie. While we want everyone to be

Do you want to want to become the peak athlete that you know your body is capable of? Well, this paper will not do that for you, but it will tell you how, and it will tell you why it should be legal to do so. Doping in sports is one of the most extensive debates within the realm of athletics. Whether it be injecting anabolic steroids, consuming them, or blood doping, athletes will do drugs. Doping has no effect on the viewership of the sport. Athletes can always find ways to cheat the system, and trying to prevent the use seems impossible. The use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) should be legalized, as long as it is allowed under medical supervision.

Thus, Sandel’s moral and my own standing diverges within the idea that athletes should be able to genetically enhance and increase their muscle mass to have an edge over competitors. I strongly disagree with this concept as I perceive it to be ethically wrong. Yet, Sandel appears to diminish the idea that stepping over this imaginary line is not detrimental to his argument, I believe it is. In addition, Sandel points out that the moral standing of genetic enhancement should not be argued on the fairness aspect. Yet, I strongly argue on that belief. For instance, Sandel notes that genetic enhancement would likely be similar to athletes utilizing steroids, and that it could be garnered as a safe alternative and approach Yet, what I am challenging Sandel on is the fact that steroids are not only illegal but greatly frowned upon and

The technology is used to help humans overcome the physical and/ or mental limitations of the human body, resulting in the temporary or permanent augmentation of a person's abilities and features. In the piece, “The Case Against Perfection,” Michael J. Sandel argues that genetic enhancement is morally questionable. I will argue why his reasoning, more specifically his defense of “the giftedness of life,” is irrational. In this essay, I will explain Sandel’s moral objection against genetic enhancement, argue that his idea of “giftedness” is not as valuable as he states, and finally consider why my argument could be seen as fallible.

The use of human enhancement is becoming a popular debate in today’s society. We constantly ask ourselves and others if it is morally right to use technology to give couples the “perfect” baby? What about using it to make ourselves nearly perfect? Many people will automatically say no, but when asked why, they fail to come up with a decent response. Michael Sandel’s article, “What’s Wrong with Enhancement?” from Contemporary Moral Issues 4th edition by Lawrence M. Hinman gives us an inside look into what may actually be wrong with allowing human enhancements.

The Case for Enhancing People, the author Ronald Baily does not believe using medical tools to enhance humans is morally troubling. He believes that enhancements will only help people live better lives. (Kaebnick p 145)The author defines an enhancement as a procedure that improves functioning and increases the capabilities of human flourishing. I do not think that humans should try to play the role of God and do things that should be left to Him. But I also believe that God has given us the knowledge to discover these technologies and procedures that allow us to lengthen or improve our quality of life. The history of the last two centuries has shown that technological advance has been far more advantageous than harmful for humankind. One

New research shows that the brain is still affected by non concussive hits. Many new studies, including one of one hundred and fifty nine athletes by Thomas McAllister, show that “[...]a season of small hits may cause changes to the brain”(3). This fact is imperative because it suggests that all Football players are at risk, not just the ones that suffer concussions. If students playing football are almost hate teed to acquire brain damage then the sport must be stopped. Theses studies also suggest that “[...]repetitive blows to the head can cause major problems, even when an athlete is able to get up and keep playing, said study leader Thomas McAllister”(3). Not only do small hits cause damage, they cause major problems. Football should not be allowed in schools

In a world where new technologies are constantly produced, ethical questions are risen. These ethical questions pertain to how these new technologies will benefit or threaten social progress. When discussing the potential of human enhancement technologies, we will consider the effects on health, pre-existing social gaps, and the importance of understanding the means to an end. Each of these topics is essential to our discussion of what constitutes societal progress and if social growth can be achieved in the face of biological intervention.

Researchers at Imperial College London found that applying a low voltage current can bring different areas of the brain in sync with one another, enabling people to perform better on tasks involving working memory.

Birds eye vision, ant-like strength, Einstein level intelligence, and the ability to live to 1,000 years are all possible changes to humanity in the near future. Humans have been enhancing themselves all over the world for many centuries, and the advancement of nanotechnologies is not slowing that down. These modifications already take place in the form of ancient Olympians eating mushrooms before events, Renaissance women wearing corsets to slim their waists, and modern athletes using steroids for muscle development . Enhancing ourselves through education, caffeine, herbal medications, meditation, and exercise are non-technological approaches that are not morally debated. Although inevitably unresolved, the first thing that needs to be