Brazilian Health Care System Analysis

A Comparative Analysis of Health Care Professionals in Brazil to Those in the United States

The U.S. health care system is way more complex than what meets the eye. A major difference between the health care system in the U.S. and other nations, is that the U.S. does not have universal health care. Lack of a universal health care opens up the doors for competition amongst insurance, physicians, technology, hospitals and outpatient services.

The United States (U.S) healthcare system is a large private system that consist of multiple payers, which leaves the U.S

Providing healthcare coverage to all citizens can be challenging to many countries and only the most developed countries have adequate resources to truly provide universal coverage to their citizens. Still, when coverage and resources are not sufficient, care is rationed through limited supply or limited access. Most countries have mechanisms in place, however, to insure that affordability does not limit access to necessary services.

The first characteristic of the US health care system is that there is no central governing agency which allows for little integration and coordination. While the government has a great influence on the health care system, the system is mostly controlled through private hands. The system is financed publically and privately creating a variety of payments and delivery unlike centrally controlled healthcare systems in other developed countries. The US system is more complex and less manageable than centrally controlled health care systems, which makes it more expensive. The second characteristic of the US health care system is that it is technology driven and focuses on acute care. With more usage of high technology,

The health care system differs from the system in the U.S. is that they make everyone all citizens buy insurance and the poor are subsidzed.

Healthcare is essential to the nature of our well- being, it provides some financial relief to individuals or families during doctor or hospital visits. Medical care is very expensive, and without health insurance it can be even more of a financial burden. However, being able to afford health insurance has been a challenge for a lot of family’s. For some, they must choose whether to feed their families, pay utility bills or make monthly health insurance payments; so, they allow the insurance to laps. The

The United States health care system is not really a system because a true system does not exist. The system involves financing, insurance, delivery, and payment; they generally overlap each other but the results can vary between private and government-run systems. Insurance offers some protection against disastrous events although, some employers can decided if they will offer health insurance to their employees; those that do not usually buy private insurance or none at all. Delivery or provider render services to the people who have health insurance for example hospitals, private practices, dentist, etc. According to Politicususa, before Obamacare nearly “10 million people were previously uninsured”; these people had to pay for health care costs out of pocket or not be seen at all. There are agencies that provide free care for individuals for people who cannot afford insurance, Medicaid and Medicare.

The American healthcare system is an ongoing ailment that is at the forefront of issues plaguing America. Unlike the rest of the world, the American healthcare system is a combination of several models that caters for distinct classes of people. Other countries, such as China and Switzerland, have adopted a one-size-fits-all model in which everyone falls under. This model is a more straightforward as well as cheaper approach to America's healthcare system.

In Canada or Great Britain, the government funds healthcare providers through taxes, and such a system is called social. The United States, on the other hand, being a profoundly capitalistic country, opted for another route and passed the burden of healthcare spending on private consumers as well as other

The cost of care has been a growing problem throughout developed nations during the last 15 years. For example, across 34 nations that make up the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the average per capita health care expenditure increased by more than 70 percent between 2000 and 2010. However, the biggest spenders — such as

When taking a look at the government financed, it is inclined to make health care available to every individual in the nation. This system give the most basic level of care to those who need it. People are assessed small fees and also pay for their coverage through taxes. With the way that this system is set up, the government can chose to provide for itself or they can decide to use a second party with some type of mutual agreement between the both. In government based health care the government can provide for itself or may use a secondary party to provide. I the United States a prime example of this system is what most Americans know as Medicare and Medicaid.

The differences between a universal healthcare system and a private healthcare system are many. Like anything else, there are strengths and weaknesses to each system. Some of the strengths of the U.S. type of healthcare system are; “choice, responsiveness, availability to customers willing to pay for coverage and control over decisions related to your healthcare (Bolnick, 2002).” The strengths of a universal healthcare system are; “universal coverage, cost control, low overhead costs and you pay a tax based on your earnings (Bolnick, 2002).” Of course, both systems have weaknesses as well. According to Bolnick, the weaknesses of the private systems are; no universal coverage, excessive costs, risk related premiums and challenges to limit costs. The weaknesses of the public healthcare system are; “unresponsiveness, not all

However, in Europe and Japan, to name a few countries, Health Care is Universal. According to Austin & Wetle, “Universal Health Care or Single-Payer Health Care is subsidized by the government. This system provides 100% of the population with basic and affordable health coverage; America’s Health System currently supplies 82% of its population. (2012).

The quality of obstetric care can depend on different barriers to access, education, or race and class. The healthcare system in Brazil is split between private and public sectors. Brazil has the Brazilian Public Health System known as the SUS that provides services to citizens because healthcare is considered a public right. Studies have shown the high rate of cesareans occur at private hospitals where women are paying more for care. The country’s healthcare is around 30% private and 70% public, which supports the inequality amongst the population. Those who can afford private healthcare receive more of a choice. These women also tend to keep the same doctor throughout their pregnancy allowing for more benefits and informed decisions