Breaking A Law

In Martin Luther King’s, “Letter from Birmingham Jail” he explains what he thinks is a just law and what makes an unjust law.So what makes a just and an unjust law? A just law, according to King, is a man made code that squares with the moral code. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. In the world we live in today most laws are just, but many issues are caused by prejudice people. Many are afraid to suffer the consequences that come with standing up for what is right. For me, suffering the consequences would be worth it if not everyone is given equal rights, one race is being attacked about a certain law, and if a law forces me to do something I refuse to do.

The differences between legal rules and other kinds of rules is that criminal law refers to the consequences associated with breaking them. As the substantive law meaning that it is the law of crimes, referring that Criminal law is the code conduct that all in the society need to follow the rule, and the prohibitions on murder, assault, and burglary. Meaning that if an individual violates or commits these crimes they are going to be treated as a criminal by punishing act from the state. Civil law is refers to procedural law to follow the rule of the state from someone that has committed a crime. Which it is divided into 5 categories, for example torts, property, contract, family, and juvenile law.

Summarize the contents of the source
It contains 282 rules covering aspects of civil, commercial and criminal law. It prescribes some actions, prohibits others and provides for punishments.

What’s worst, being the shortest in the grade or going to jail? How about going to jail for being the shortest in the grade! I know what you’re thinking, how can someone be locked up for being vertically challenged? Well the truth is it wasn’t your usual arrest, then court, then jail procedures, in fact there was no police involved at all. If there were then maybe they would have seen how someone of my status, my four foot seven pimple faced, bracer faced, glasses face status could not even attempt anything as badass and remotely worthy of being locked up. You see in this world there are winners and then there are losers, with my father’s brainiac genetics and my mother’s maniac genetics there is no surprise that I was

Have you ever been to jail before?Have you ever committed a crime?Have you ever learn from your mistakes?Well I'm going to tell you a little story about this girl going to jail for robbing a bank,and how she learned that she shouldn't do it again.And I'm also going to tell you how you can learn from your mistakes.

A child refuses to eat his vegetables. An office worker consistently comes in late. A man refuses to pay taxes on the basis that taxes infringe upon his property rights. Citizens are arrested in the park for handing out food to the homeless. Many different types of disobedience exist in a free society, ranging from the insular to the national and from unjust to just. That a free society inevitably spawns disobedience is well settled, since having the choice to disobey is part of being free, but the effect and the role that disobedience plays in a free society have been extensively debated. Some argue that disobedience is anathema to a free society because it leads to only more disobedience and suffering, while others argue that disobedience

All around us laws are being broke; severe, mild, for a good cause, or for a bad one. When a police car, fire truck or an ambulance speeds, they are breaking the law. However, it is allowed since they are doing everything in their power to protect, serve and rescue. As an old saying goes 'For every rule, there will be an exception', it makes sense to have an exception for breaking a morally unjust law in good conscience. In life, multiple paths will present itself and after all else has failed, it is acceptable to move on to the last possible option if no serious harm is done-even if it means breaking the law to do so. After all, An unjust law is no law at

Breaking the law is simple to do, any person can make a decision to not care and end up in jail. Socrates was a man who believed in the law and willing to stay in jail for life for a crime that he didn’t commit. However, there are some circumstances that a person may have to break the law to be heard and get their point across and be heard and Crito had another idea he wanted Socrates to break the law and get out of jail, Crito explains to Socrates that why be in jail for a crime that he didn’t commit wouldn’t it make more guilty being in jail but Socrates significance of the law was deeper than Crito’s. He believed that just because the people of the law are crooks and want him in jail or trying to easily to pin things on him it isn’t the law fault for a person’s mistake. The law has always helped him since the day he was born he benefited from the law and that is

Examining the population after breaking the data in to categories, it reveals that millions of people are in jails or prisons that do not need to be incarcerated whatsoever. Right now, over 11 million people sit in jail because they do not have access to bail or good legal counsel (Wagner W. P. 4). In reality, county jails across the nation are filled with people who have not received a conviction by trial, but remain in custody for long periods of time, up to years at a time. Meanwhile, over 1.6 million people are arrested each year for non-violence related crimes, lessening the punishment for these types of crimes would reduce the population dramatically. Another 200,000 for misdemeanor crimes where instead of fines or treatment, people are held for up to one year in most states.

Kids in certain areas don’t have access to quality education that other children may have. Only 65% attend school & 50% have had to repeat grade levels! Poor education leads to poor jobs, poor jobs lead to bad decisions like selling drugs or joining gangs, selling drugs or joining gangs lead to a lot people going to jail, and people going to jail leads to a high crime rate! It’s a repeating cycle. So if the government spent more money on getting people proper education there would be better jobs. This could also fix the underemployment because if people are uneducated there are much more service jobs than jobs that actually take education so some very intelligent people have no choice but to work service jobs so if more people are educated

The school should have a policy stating that teachers should not give out more than around two hours of homework per week. This is reasonable because each student has approximately six classes, and if each

In the recent discussions of laws, an issue has arisen about the correctness of breaking laws. On one hand, some argue that breaking any laws would create a state of anarchy, and as such, needs to be avoided at all cost. On the other hand, there are people who argue that breaking the law is necessary to the improvement of our world. They say that the only way for people to understand the wrongness of a law, the law must be broken. In short, the issue is whether breaking the law should or should not be done. My own view is that non-utilitarian laws must be broken but the consequences of breaking such laws must also be followed.

I argue that the law can be violated by people with power. Powerful people will use their influence to manipulate the law if that serves their interests. In those cases, they don’t care about compromising their ethics, or anyone else’s for that matter. Roy is a powerful person; he did something that broke the law and his own ethics. He needs to clean this mistake.

Some people may argue that the spill should not be treated as crime because it is just the risks associated with drilling and it was truly an accident. Reiman’s point provide a basis for being the devil’s advocate in terms of using his categories that he outlines as a basis for how it is not a crime. BP could have had no intent in committing such a heinous act. Recklessness, negligent, concealment, and knowledge were all absent from the spill and that this solely occurred as a freak of nature. The assertion that BP had not met any of those standards means that BP had no knowledge that this was a foreseeable risk, and that what happened to the ecosystem and economies is something that they shouldn’t be liable for.

The truth is in front of you. Everyone knew police officers lied to us. You said the protest was not “legal”, about that, Does something “legal” mean that must be “reasonable” or “righteous” ? Does something “Illegal” must be wrong?