Brief History of Financial System

The Gold Standard was the framework by which the value of cash was characterized in terms of gold, for which the money could be traded. The Gold Standard ended up being deserted in the Depression of the 1930s. Friedman felt that,“The gold standard is not feasible because the mythology and beliefs required to make it effective do not exist. This conclusion is supported not only by the general historical evidence referred to but also by the specific experience of the United States” ( “The Gold Standard:Please Stop”).Economists who contradict the Gold Standard may perceive what must be accomplished with a specific end goal to make a centrally controlled paper standard better than a decentralized Gold Standard. Milton Friedman poses the key question: "How can we establish a monetary system that is stable, free from irresponsible tinkering, and

(1) Explain what the Stable-Monetary-Unit Assumption is (10 points) and (2) provide an example of its application. (10 points)

D. the liquidation of currency in favour of precious metals as a hedge against inflation.

In 1892 Mary E. Lease talks about the low prices in farming and how politicians mislead them and tell them decreasing prices are from overproduction(Document G). Even though Lease thought otherwise data at the time was contrary. Document A shows this. For wheat as production increased price per bushel decreased, for cotton for the most part as production increases the price per pound decreases, for corn from 1870-1885 as production increased price decreased. 1900 in the outliner because production increased and so did price. This is way in Document J farmers are against the gold standard. Big cities were for the gold standard because it helped with industrialization but farmers were against it for a plethora of reasons. Their complaints were gold's inflexibility. When farmers brought their crop to market in the fall, an inflexible currency would cause a shortage of money which would drive down prices. Document H talks about the unpredictability of farming and how this can affect prices of the product. And based on the price of the product it depends how much food a family can keep for themselves. So not only is the production of the product to sell unpredictable but so is the welfare of the family based

* Paper money issued as a promise for hard specie such as gold and silver

silver production and how the inflation ruined the economies. In documents 1,5, and 6 it shows

During his presidency, William McKinley had many domestic affairs to deal with. Amid the most significant issues, McKinley’s tariff legislation was a big one. Bimetallism was also an important issue. The McKinley administration went after an agreement that would include silver, as a standard European currency. McKinley didn’t like the idea so he began promoting a completely gold-based currency. In 1900, he signed the Gold Standard Act, which officially ended the use of silver as a standard of United States currency and established gold as the only standard. This still affects us today because although no country uses the gold standard, there is a rising support for its reintroduction in the hope of regulating U.S.

In the beginning of the use of fiat currency, many governments backed the value of the currency with gold. For a while, thirty five United States Dollars could be traded for 1 Troy ounce of gold at a bank. Today however, the USD is no longer backed by gold. Most money today is “just worthless paper”, and if the government endorsing that money fails, it turns that currency into useless paper. (This is causes hyperinflation and recently happened to the Zimbabwean dollar.)

In FLB, the term, “unholy trinity” is introduced. It explains that no country can choose to simultaneously maintain a fixed exchange rate, full capital mobility, and domestic monetary policy authority (FLB, 279). Considering the framework of the Unholy Trinity, countries submitting to the Gold Standard are restricted from choosing which tenant of the trinity to surrender as a result of the two basic principles of the Gold Standard. FLB explains, “First, a country must commit its monetary authorities to freely exchange the domestic currency for gold at a fixed rate, without limitation or condition,” the

After World War II, the Bretton Woods Agreement established the gold standard and two support institutions called the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. This would lead to a shift, away from the gold standard, to more relaxed systems. The idea of currency purely backed by gold was slowly being shifted to a trust based currency. These institutions purpose was to regulate the economies by injecting or taking money in a process called sterilization. Sterilization is to protect certain countries from a going bankrupt. If a country goes bankrupt, it chain a chain reaction of bankruptcies. So, in order to maintain balance, currencies need to be stable enough, so that it can be in debt without having to declare bankruptcy. The idea is

“A weak currency is the sign of a weak economy, and a weak economy leads to a weak nation.” – Ross Perot. The words of the 1992 Presidential candidate still ring true today, and in fact they have since the abolition of the gold standard in 1971 by President Nixon. Ever since that warm August day the United States has been on a death plunge into immaculate amounts of debt. However, by the establishment of the silver standard in the way I will explain to you today, makes it clear that action on such a policy must be taken.

Many people feel that switching from the paper standard that the United States is in now, isn’t going to help with any of our problems. In many articles it shows the fact on how the gold standard has many things it can cure other than debt. For example, When the original gold standard occurred, in the

At the end of World War Two, the Bretton Woods system was established for world currencies. This system involved countries fixing their currencies to the US Dollar, which in turn was tied to the value of gold at a fixed exchange rate of $35 per ounce. As this was a fixed exchange rate system it effectively forced countries to pursue a certain monetary policy, in order to keep their currency pegged to the Dollar and in turn the value of gold.

One of the characteristics of gold standard defined by Temin is that the adjustment mechanism for a trade deficit country was deflation rather than devaluation, that is, a change in domestic prices instead of a change in the exchange rate. In the event of a balance-of-payment deficit, countries on the gold standard could not devalue their currencies or expand the money supply to stimulate domestic demand, because by doing so would push up good prices, encourage more gold exports, and weaken the currency. Instead, they could only tighten monetary conditions with the goal of reducing domestic prices and costs until international balance was restored. “Critical to this process was the effort to reduce wages, the largest element in costs.” That is to say, the gold standard system must be maintained at the expense of the welfare of ordinary people, which they must either experienced wages fall or unemployment. This mechanism worked well to facilitate trade and exchange before the First World War, the reason,

1. The gold standard and the money supply. Under the gold standard all national governments promised to follow the “rules of the game”. This meant defending a fixed exchange rate. What did this promise imply about a country’s money supply? A country’s money supply was limited to the amount of gold held by its central bank or treasury. For example, if a country had 1,000,000 ounces of gold and its fixed rate of exchange was 100 local currency units per ounce of gold, that country could have 100,000,000 local currency units outstanding. Any change in its holdings of